Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

how come people stick to a 224 in a 5.3?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-17-2009, 07:19 PM
  #1  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
nastychevelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: troy, IL
Posts: 934
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default how come people stick to a 224 in a 5.3?

whats the reason people chose to stick to around a 224 cam in a 5.3 what if someone wanted something bigger... like what would the equivalent for like a ms4 be in a 5.3?

i just want to know why no one goes real big with a 5.3. i know people will say "bigger is not always better" and i know that, but thats not what im askin.
Old 08-17-2009, 08:44 PM
  #2  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
crainholio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,977
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

My 4 year-old kid asks questions like "Why is the sky blue?" all the time, I should show him this.
Old 08-18-2009, 02:16 AM
  #3  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
ramdaspadhye's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

No need to be a dick to the guy...

You can run a large cam in a 5.3 if your setup calls for it (ie light car, high stall, tall gears, etc).

5.3's aren't as big as 6.0's, therefore they don't "eat up" cams as well as a larger displacement motor. Not sure else how to explain it...
Old 08-18-2009, 02:24 AM
  #4  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (26)
 
04gtoBMXracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Albuquerque nm
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

im 99% sure a tsp tourquer v2 fits no problem...
Old 08-18-2009, 11:26 AM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (127)
 
NemeSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 6,886
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

the main reason being dcr. the 5.3 is usually 9.4:1
5.3+big cam+low scr/dcr=
Old 08-18-2009, 11:33 AM
  #6  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
 
5_02ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

because 90% of the time the engine is in a heavy *** truck...also due to the smaller cubes and lower CR,the power band is higher than an ls1 or 6oh......an ms4 and a 5.3 would make for 7000rpm shifts....
Old 08-18-2009, 12:28 PM
  #7  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (31)
 
bjamick's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Birmingham AL.
Posts: 4,218
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NemeSS
the main reason being dcr. the 5.3 is usually 9.4:1
5.3+big cam+low scr/dcr=
Sweet so it ='s a Sleeper..
Old 08-18-2009, 12:38 PM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (127)
 
NemeSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 6,886
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bjamick
Sweet so it ='s a Sleeper..
I guess u could call it that.
it sure will run like the motor is half asleep and hung over.
Old 08-18-2009, 01:55 PM
  #9  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
hellbents10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Spring Lake, MI
Posts: 4,439
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Right, the get a little lazy if you get carried away with large cams. Just have to remember you have a few less cubes and low compression. You get in the 230 duration range and they sound pretty nasty. They work better when you mill the heads though.
Old 08-18-2009, 01:58 PM
  #10  
LSX Mechanic
iTrader: (89)
 
Damian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 10,389
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Another reason is driveability. Smaller motors don't "swallow" cams as well, so a 224 will tend to run more like a 228-230 cam in a 5.3L motor.

In any 5.3L builds I do I typically use something in the 218-224 range in duration, mill the **** out the heads, and make some crazy TQ. Always works well and drives nice & smooth.
Old 08-18-2009, 08:52 PM
  #11  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
nastychevelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: troy, IL
Posts: 934
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

what about a cam going in a 1994 camaro with a 4000 stall and 4.10's?

would a single plane and a 4150 style TB complement a big cam in a 5.3 with arp rod bolts since they like rpms?
Old 08-18-2009, 11:19 PM
  #12  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
ramdaspadhye's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'd just leave it stock and put a turbo on it.
Old 08-19-2009, 02:47 AM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
salemetro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Salem/Keizer
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ramdaspadhye
I'd just leave it stock and put a turbo on it.
What he said ^^^
Old 08-19-2009, 06:44 AM
  #14  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
nastychevelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: troy, IL
Posts: 934
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by ramdaspadhye
I'd just leave it stock and put a turbo on it.
that might be the plan... and i have a 218/224 114lsa cam in it right now
Old 08-19-2009, 12:39 PM
  #15  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
ramdaspadhye's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

you should be ok with that cam as it has -7* overlap.

Get ya one of these...

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Preci...=p4506.c0.m245
Old 08-19-2009, 08:27 PM
  #16  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
nastychevelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: troy, IL
Posts: 934
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by ramdaspadhye
you should be ok with that cam as it has -7* overlap.

Get ya one of these...

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Preci...=p4506.c0.m245
to much money ill stick with a single 75mm S400
Old 08-19-2009, 08:36 PM
  #17  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (40)
 
00pooterSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dallas
Posts: 4,916
Received 523 Likes on 372 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by nastychevelle
what about a cam going in a 1994 camaro with a 4000 stall and 4.10's?

would a single plane and a 4150 style TB complement a big cam in a 5.3 with arp rod bolts since they like rpms?
You still have the lack of compression issue, you can put all the intake, carb, exh in the world on it but if the dcr/scr is low then a big cam will only add to that problem. what everyone has said above is the motor is smaller to begin with so just from that you have to match the cam accordingly, secondly and more importantly the compression is much lower, and a big cam even further lowers the DCR so then you have a fat lazy no low end turd trying to pull a near 4 thousand pound brick out of the hole, gonna have no ***** and be no fun to drive. Raise the compression and you have a different story.
Old 08-19-2009, 08:40 PM
  #18  
Teching In
iTrader: (7)
 
jadave76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

How much would one recommend milling the heads with say a torquer v2 on a 5.3 without running in to ptv issues?
Old 08-19-2009, 08:42 PM
  #19  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
nastychevelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: troy, IL
Posts: 934
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

what if i milled them to around 11-11.5:1 compression?
Old 08-19-2009, 08:49 PM
  #20  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (40)
 
00pooterSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dallas
Posts: 4,916
Received 523 Likes on 372 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by nastychevelle
what if i milled them to around 11-11.5:1 compression?
then that would help a ton, if you wanna go real big duration even higher is fine, have you read about STATIC compression and DYNAMIC compression? DYNAMIC brings the cam into play in the compression ratio, the question you are asking is about STATIC compression and really means nothing once the cam comes into play, its really all about DCR.

Basically speaking.... the bigger the cam the lower the DCR.. Do some reading on it and you will understand much better.

I do not know how much you need to mill the heads or can before you get into piston to valve clearance, besides you would have to know what cam you are running and what head gasket thickness before that could be calculated anyway. Sorry can only answer part of your question.

Also.. the really big cams are for big end pull, do you want all high end or do you want low end grunt? Thats another wonderful thing about the 224, low end.

If you wanna budget hard running 5.3, mill the heads and do a Z06 cam, it wont be doing wheelies but it will be snappy and fun.


Quick Reply: how come people stick to a 224 in a 5.3?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:28 PM.