compcams lsr 227/235 113 lsa VS. streetsweeper HT 228/232 111lsa
08-27-2009, 06:24 PM
#1
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
compcams lsr 227/235 113 lsa VS. streetsweeper HT 228/232 111lsa hey guys,
Im from Australia. i have a VU SS which is basically the ute version of the gto u guys have over there with an ls1 in it. im looking at 2 medium sized cams just wondering if anyone has any idea how these 2compare? I think on the compcams website the 227/235 has a rpm range of 1900-7000 and the streetsweeper ht prob runs similar - would both run almost identicle or would the lsr cam hav the wider torque curve?
planning to complement the setup with the following:
3600 lock up stall though may go bigger if needed.
3.9 diff gears
stock heads cnc'd
thanks.
Gav
Im from Australia. i have a VU SS which is basically the ute version of the gto u guys have over there with an ls1 in it. im looking at 2 medium sized cams just wondering if anyone has any idea how these 2compare? I think on the compcams website the 227/235 has a rpm range of 1900-7000 and the streetsweeper ht prob runs similar - would both run almost identicle or would the lsr cam hav the wider torque curve?
planning to complement the setup with the following:
3600 lock up stall though may go bigger if needed.
3.9 diff gears
stock heads cnc'd
thanks.
Gav
Last edited by gavlotic; 08-27-2009 at 06:30 PM. Reason: .
08-28-2009, 09:52 AM
#5
I definately think the 111 camshaft would be a better bet by comparing the two of them. Let me throw another camshaft into your list just for grinds. We have a new 229/236 .620/.617 111+3 that we developed off engine dyno testing. I think that camshaft would work very well for you. It uses TSP intake lobe & a XFI exhaust lobe. I've dyno tested it next to a bunch of similar duration camshafts & it's worked very well for us. I have a few I used for dyno testing you could buy from us for a discounted price!!!
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
08-28-2009, 09:55 AM
#6
I definately think the 111 camshaft would be a better bet by comparing the two of them. Let me throw another camshaft into your list just for grinds. We have a new 229/236 .620/.617 111+3 that we developed off engine dyno testing. I think that camshaft would work very well for you. It uses TSP intake lobe & a XFI exhaust lobe. I've dyno tested it next to a bunch of similar duration camshafts & it's worked very well for us. I have a few I used for dyno testing you could buy from us for a discounted price!!!
Trending Topics
08-28-2009, 05:19 PM
#9
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
wow thanx wow,
thanks for the replies guys.
Predator Z,
that was the kind of info I was looking for. I couldn't tell just by looking at durations, lsa and overlap.
Jason,
that cam looks interesting could you show some more data?
Ed,
thanks I'll shoot them an email.
A lot of people seem pretty happy with this cam - thanks again for chiming in.
cheers guys.
gav
thanks for the replies guys.
Predator Z,
that was the kind of info I was looking for. I couldn't tell just by looking at durations, lsa and overlap.
Jason,
that cam looks interesting could you show some more data?
Ed,
thanks I'll shoot them an email.
A lot of people seem pretty happy with this cam - thanks again for chiming in.
cheers guys.
gav
