Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

will this work?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-07-2009, 03:34 PM
  #1  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Demonhawk01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default will this work?

prc 5.3/2.5 heads,ported and polished
flowed chambers milled to 59cc
stock pistons with 2cc valve reliefs
cometic .040 gasket
tourquer v.3


now i know this will work mechanically but how well do you guys think this will perform? auto car with 3.23s, daily driven. thanks
Old 12-07-2009, 04:06 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Should perform nicely, just make sure you get the geometry, spring pressures and preload spot on to last reliably on the LSK intake lobes.
Old 12-07-2009, 05:12 PM
  #3  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Demonhawk01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
Should perform nicely, just make sure you get the geometry, spring pressures and preload spot on to last reliably on the LSK intake lobes.
thanks for the reply, now from what i have calculated, if my bore is 3.900, stroke is 3.62, head gasket is .040, chamber is 59cc, that brings me to a compression ratio of 11.92:1, would you say this is correct? and is this pump gas worthy?
Old 12-07-2009, 06:24 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (18)
 
zacht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

woa, i think the 59cc heads put you closer to 11:1. for 2 examples LS1-67cc is 10.2 64cc is 10.5. so just rough extimates its around 11.1:1. still streetable. someone will have to chime in with the exacts....
Old 12-07-2009, 06:44 PM
  #5  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Demonhawk01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

just used 4 more compression ration calculators and came up with 11.9205, 11.9200, 11.900, 11.900, im not saying u dont know what ur talkin about, i dont really trust any of these calculators any, but it seems fairly consistant, heres the best one i have found.

http://www.not2fast.com/turbo/compre...pression.shtml
Old 12-07-2009, 10:06 PM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
SOMbitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,881
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Use a DCR calculator and shoot for 8.5 or less........ around 8.3 is close to optimal on pump gas.....
Old 12-08-2009, 03:05 AM
  #7  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Demonhawk01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SOMbitch
Use a DCR calculator and shoot for 8.5 or less........ around 8.3 is close to optimal on pump gas.....
thats another thing i was concerned about, i know when u get that high, the dcr is just as important, thanks man, nice av
Old 12-08-2009, 04:51 AM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Your SCR (static) is ~ 11.51 so well within range of pump gas.
Any advance in your cam? 111+?? (What is your ICL?)
Old 12-08-2009, 11:45 PM
  #9  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
thewholefnshow1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Demonhawk01
now i know this will work mechanically but how well do you guys think this will perform? auto car with 3.23s, daily driven. thanks
Like crap. I know everyone is going to say I'm wrong and demonhawk that's a good setup except you need to go to a 3.73 gear with a stall converter. I'm not expert by no means but I can't believe didn't no of us catch this sooner. You have a great setup throw a stall and different gear, an see you later.
Old 12-09-2009, 03:12 AM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

If you get the ss4000 Yank, you might not even need the gears. I've had similar grinds work very well with 3.23s.
Why? because being an auto, and with 4000 stall, when you punch it, wham.. you are in the powerband.
Old 12-09-2009, 11:50 AM
  #11  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 0
Received 81 Likes on 72 Posts

Default

I think it will work well with a 4k converter. However, switching to a 3.73 gear will help the converter be a little more driveable around town.
Old 12-09-2009, 05:14 PM
  #12  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
thewholefnshow1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hey preadator-z and 01ssreda4 Thanks alot for commenting on my post. I don't know much about the converter's and gears but I know alot of people say if you don't have a stall the car may push through the breaks and stuff. But the thanks for helping out more and helping me understand more.
Old 12-09-2009, 07:42 PM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 0
Received 81 Likes on 72 Posts

Default

It wont just push through the brakes, but it will also be a DOG in the low and midrange. Auto cars need converters, no ifs ands or buts about it. You will be getting beat by bolt on only cars and wonder why. I like the what another member stated about driving with a V3 and too small of a stall. He said it went something like this : Launch, bog, pull, shift, bog, pull, shift, bog, pull...




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:09 PM.