Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

243 heads with stock ls1 cam

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-02-2010, 08:52 PM
  #81  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
printmanjackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Paint_It_Black
ok, we know hydraulic lifters are intended to make up for valvetrain dimensional differences as well as providing a self-adjusting method of maintaining valve lash, or rather the lack of. By setting the valvetrain so the lifter plunger is depressed slightly, the lifter is able to compensate for these differences, making a convenient hassle-free valvetrain set-up.

For performance applications, lifter preload is not needed or wanted. As rpm's increase, the lifter has a tendency to bounce over the back of the lobe as it comes back down from the maximum lift point. The pressurized oil fills the lifter body to account for this bouncing. Eventually, after several engine revolutions, the oil can completely fill the lifter body and the plunger will be pushed up to its full travel (pump-up). Higher oil pressures can amplify this problem. With the lifter pre-loaded, this can cause a valve to run off it's seat and can cause piston clearance issues if and when pump-up occurs.

By setting the valvetrain at 'zero' preload, lifter pump up is eliminated and in most cases, the cam will rev higher. Ford tech articles in late 60's actually urged 'stock' class racers to run .001-.003 lash on hydraulic cams.
I think I understand: so in short, you want to "just load" the lifter so it has room to pump up at high RPM. is this correct?



Quick Reply: 243 heads with stock ls1 cam



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:45 PM.