Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Lifter Problems with 346

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-23-2003, 02:08 PM
  #101  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
BADSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Oxford, NC
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Update: Mike looked at my dyno sheets, and agrees that I am seeing valvefloat at higher RPM's. However, he thinks it is all after the peak, in which case I may not gain any peak power by fixing the problem.
Old 12-23-2003, 02:58 PM
  #102  
TECH Fanatic
 
niphilli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,695
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BADSS
JPR had mine totally removed for my M6; I can say it 'hits' much harder now.

Thanks, Viper. That's what I thought.
Torque Management most certainly has an impact on M6 cars. It is more invasive on the '01+ cars than on the pre '01s. If you powershift an '01+ car you can feel it lay down as torque management kicks in. My '03 Z lays down bigtime inbetween shifts from TM. It has never been a big issue on my '99.

Last edited by niphilli; 12-23-2003 at 03:15 PM.
Old 12-23-2003, 03:02 PM
  #103  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Cstraub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tri-Cities, TN
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 22 Posts

Default

Has anyone here used the oil restrictor pushrods to combat valve float?

Cstraub
Old 12-23-2003, 03:25 PM
  #104  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (6)
 
mikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 2,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by niphilli
Torque Management most certainly has an impact on M6 cars. It is more invasive on the '01+ cars than on the pre '01s. If you powershift an '01+ car you can feel it lay down as torque management kicks in. My '03 Z lays down bigtime inbetween shifts from TM. It has never been a big issue on my '99.
Nick, what solid data do you have to back this up? Any timing logs? I've tried it both ways on the dyno and at the track on M6's and have seen no difference in timing or et/mph either way. Not trying to bash you, I've had this question for a while now and no-one seems to be able to prove to me with solid data that TR affects an M6 and if so, how. As a matter of course, I now delete it all together on any car but have only seen a difference on A4's. According to the Carputing LS1 Edit Users Guide: "This table defines the timing retard used to implement the torque reduction that is requested in the shift table. It defines the timing retard that is used for a requested % torque reduction. See the Transmission Page, shift firmness tabs for abuse control parameters."

Last edited by mikey; 12-23-2003 at 04:02 PM.
Old 12-23-2003, 04:37 PM
  #105  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,605
Received 1,454 Likes on 1,008 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Cstraub
Has anyone here used the oil restrictor pushrods to combat valve float?

Cstraub
What's a oil restrictor push rod? A P-rod that keeps oil in the lifter so it can't bleed down.

Do they hurt the valve train?
Old 12-23-2003, 04:41 PM
  #106  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,605
Received 1,454 Likes on 1,008 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by niphilli
Torque Management most certainly has an impact on M6 cars. It is more invasive on the '01+ cars than on the pre '01s. If you powershift an '01+ car you can feel it lay down as torque management kicks in. My '03 Z lays down bigtime inbetween shifts from TM. It has never been a big issue on my '99.
My 99 will break the tires loose with power into 4th and doesn't lay down so much for Torque Mangement
Old 12-23-2003, 04:46 PM
  #107  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
Viper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 4,909
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

"As a matter of course, I now delete it all together on any car but have only seen a difference on A4's"

Mikey, why delete it on M6's if it has no effect via timing tables at the track/street? I didn't include the dyno because you can't powershift on the dyno.
Old 12-23-2003, 04:46 PM
  #108  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Cstraub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tri-Cities, TN
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 22 Posts

Default

They restrict oil to the rockers only. One end of the tube is die formed solid then a wire EDM is used to put a .030" hole in this end. This end goes towards the lifter and restricts the oil up the pushrod. This maintains oil above the plunger and keeps the lifter from "pumping up".. I have sold a few sets to engine builders for the LS1's. We have made hundreds of sets for the 5.0 Mustang guys.

Cstraub
Old 12-23-2003, 05:24 PM
  #109  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (6)
 
mikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 2,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Viper
"As a matter of course, I now delete it all together on any car but have only seen a difference on A4's"

Mikey, why delete it on M6's if it has no effect via timing tables at the track/street? I didn't include the dyno because you can't powershift on the dyno.
Because some say it makes a difference. I have not seen it at the dyno or AT THE TRACK like the post says. Did you read it or just wanting to start ****? FWIW, we track tested our head and cam car both ways while power shifting with the RAM VDS 910 and saw no timing retard either way. The car went low 11's every pass and same mph. Show me proof is all I ask. Do you have it?
Old 12-23-2003, 05:29 PM
  #110  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
9T9BlueTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: CT
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Mike what did you use to check the timing on the runs? When you say you saw no timing retard was it still using the max timing in the computer? Maybe TQ management is used only in certain conditions?

I am not on anybodies side on this matter its just for personal information and Mike has been to the track more times this season that I will in a lifetime I bet.
Old 12-23-2003, 05:36 PM
  #111  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
Viper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 4,909
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Tis' the season huh pal?

I'm not starting **** with you Mikey, I merely asked a question. Sorry to get your underwear in a bunch, I was just curious. This is not a thread about torque management. I too have issues with a package from JPR but I'm not airing them here. And yes I read the thread.

Have a great holiday.
Old 12-23-2003, 05:40 PM
  #112  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (6)
 
mikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 2,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 9T9BlueTA
Mike what did you use to check the timing on the runs? When you say you saw no timing retard was it still using the max timing in the computer? Maybe TQ management is used only in certain conditions?

I am not on anybodies side on this matter its just for personal information and Mike has been to the track more times this season that I will in a lifetime I bet.
Using auto-tap one weekend and a tech 2 another weekend. I was actually trying to find a problem and suspected the torque reduction function but that wasn't it. Turned out to be a defective SLP MAF (surprise )
Old 12-23-2003, 05:43 PM
  #113  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (6)
 
mikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 2,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

HA!!! Check this out. My car was originally an M6. Well guess what? I just looked at my tune and there are still stock values in the TR tab. Imagine that, 9.65 @ 139.21 with TR! Guess it should runs 8's without eh?
Old 12-23-2003, 05:49 PM
  #114  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
9T9BlueTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: CT
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Hey Mike something for ya:

http://www.efilive.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=314
Old 12-23-2003, 05:55 PM
  #115  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (6)
 
mikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 2,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 9T9BlueTA
Good post Jim. That's what I see too for the A4's. Sometimes I actually leave it in there when stock trannies are in use.
Old 12-23-2003, 06:08 PM
  #116  
Launching!
 
VTtransam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 1 Post

Default

9T9BlueTA,

The way that guy talks about his car on that efilive site makes me think it is an automatic. He says "the transmission downshifts to first" and "as the PCM calls the tranny to upshift to second"

The way he speaks reinforces Mike's point that torque management is a (significant) factor in A4 cars, but he does not address M6 cars.

This thead has taken me a half hour to read, but I am a slow reader.

Merry Christmas to all,
Matt
Old 12-23-2003, 09:33 PM
  #117  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
BADSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Oxford, NC
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thumbs up

I wanted to let everyone know what a good guy Mike is. Here is what he has done for me, in spite of the fact I have given him alot of ****:

1.) Analyzed my dyno graphs to help diagnose the problems.
2.) Offered to leakdown and replace the ARE shortblock if needed.
3.) Offered me a sweetheart of a deal on a Rapid H/C package if I want it.
Old 12-23-2003, 09:47 PM
  #118  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
Viper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 4,909
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Excellent! Good luck man, let us know how it turns out.
Old 12-23-2003, 10:13 PM
  #119  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
gomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Confederacy
Posts: 3,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BADSS
I wanted to let everyone know what a good guy Mike is. Here is what he has done for me, in spite of the fact I have given him alot of ****:

1.) Analyzed my dyno graphs to help diagnose the problems.
2.) Offered to leakdown and replace the ARE shortblock if needed.
3.) Offered me a sweetheart of a deal on a Rapid H/C package if I want it.

If I was you... I'd jump all over #3, that will cure what ills you.
Old 12-23-2003, 10:24 PM
  #120  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
BADSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Oxford, NC
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by gomer
If I was you... I'd jump all over #3, that will cure what ills you.
I'm giving it serious consideration....its a tempting offer. Just can't tell my wife if I spend MORE MONEY on the car.


Quick Reply: Lifter Problems with 346



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:21 PM.