need help picking intake between FAST
02-05-2011, 06:40 AM
#21
before you send your intake to Tony M. ,put the heads on the block and take pics of the bottom shell ports leading to the head ports.send the pics with the intake for porting.
02-05-2011, 12:25 PM
#22
11 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Aurora IL
Posts: 1,660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
there isnt really any good deals on fast 92/92's in the classifieds right now.
im thinking of just spending the money now get the 102 with rails, put the 92mm TB and later on when i upgrade my heads to some prc227/237's ill upgrade the TB to 102 and send the intake to tony and that should really wake the car up!
in the end with the 102/102 ported and prc 227/237's i would like to run some 10.50's , doable?
now i need to figure out what kind of catback i want
im thinking of just spending the money now get the 102 with rails, put the 92mm TB and later on when i upgrade my heads to some prc227/237's ill upgrade the TB to 102 and send the intake to tony and that should really wake the car up!
in the end with the 102/102 ported and prc 227/237's i would like to run some 10.50's , doable?
now i need to figure out what kind of catback i want
02-05-2011, 11:25 PM
#30
I picked up a FAST 102 from a member on here last week. After talking to Mike Norris I am going to stick with a 92mm T/B. He said the testing/tuning he has done, there's not much benefit with the larger T/B and the 90/92 T/B's are easier to tune and have better throttle response. I have a PTM 92mm but I am looking for a NW.
02-06-2011, 01:11 AM
#32
11 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Aurora IL
Posts: 1,660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I picked up a FAST 102 from a member on here last week. After talking to Mike Norris I am going to stick with a 92mm T/B. He said the testing/tuning he has done, there's not much benefit with the larger T/B and the 90/92 T/B's are easier to tune and have better throttle response. I have a PTM 92mm but I am looking for a NW.
Just like tony said the head is only as good as the intake port and suppley of the intake.
02-06-2011, 10:41 AM
#36
I picked up a FAST 102 from a member on here last week. After talking to Mike Norris I am going to stick with a 92mm T/B. He said the testing/tuning he has done, there's not much benefit with the larger T/B and the 90/92 T/B's are easier to tune and have better throttle response. I have a PTM 92mm but I am looking for a NW.
I have posted this earlier in the thread, take off your lid and look down the snout and you will see why it only flows 84mm
02-06-2011, 08:37 PM
#39
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: N. Falmouth MA
Posts: 4,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have heard on the local boards of a couple people saying that the larger volume will kill the low end. I was originally going to get a 92, but after reading this, my research has come to a grinding halt again.. 
damn...... Will a 92/102 combo help retain some low end? I will be adding cats to this to further help the low end. It's also a Pat G TQ cam with worked over (non-milled) 243 heads from Wheel2Wheel.
damn...... Will a 92/102 combo help retain some low end? I will be adding cats to this to further help the low end. It's also a Pat G TQ cam with worked over (non-milled) 243 heads from Wheel2Wheel.
02-06-2011, 09:45 PM
#40
I have heard on the local boards of a couple people saying that the larger volume will kill the low end. I was originally going to get a 92, but after reading this, my research has come to a grinding halt again.. damn...... Will a 92/102 combo help retain some low end? I will be adding cats to this to further help the low end. It's also a Pat G TQ cam with worked over (non-milled) 243 heads from Wheel2Wheel.
damn...... Will a 92/102 combo help retain some low end? I will be adding cats to this to further help the low end. It's also a Pat G TQ cam with worked over (non-milled) 243 heads from Wheel2Wheel.