Patriot Performance flow numbers
02-13-2004, 09:13 PM
#23
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Confederacy
Posts: 3,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by foff667
posted by J2KSS
I got my TEA 1.5s today and they flowed
.500 281.6 257.9
.550 295.8 264.5
.600 305.9 267.8
I got my TEA 1.5s today and they flowed
.500 281.6 257.9
.550 295.8 264.5
.600 305.9 267.8
02-13-2004, 09:16 PM
#24
not sure it was in a post i looked up a second ago
didnt really say in the post...ive always heard the exhaust flowed better with a pipe so youd record higher #'s so im wondering why it was still just right on par for the exhaust side unless terry uses a pipe on the exhaust for his #'s as well?
didnt really say in the post...ive always heard the exhaust flowed better with a pipe so youd record higher #'s so im wondering why it was still just right on par for the exhaust side unless terry uses a pipe on the exhaust for his #'s as well?
02-13-2004, 09:23 PM
#26
TECH Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No offence but 225-230cfm on the exhaust side @.600 is PLENTY of flow and 320+ on the intake side is pretty impressive!! What are the port volumes? That tells a big story as well. 
My heads flow 227cfm on the exhaust and 298cfm on the intake at .600 with smaller than a 228cc intake port volume. (Older ARE heads but fairly recent port design)
(Current ARE heads are in the 320-330 range on the intake)
My heads were good for 124mph traps at 3500+ pounds and 11.1 ETs spinning through half of first gear on slicks. 10's@125 was only a slick change away. stock waterpump, no shortbelt etc.
My point is that you can make huge power with heads that only flow 285-295cfm.
My heads flow 227cfm on the exhaust and 298cfm on the intake at .600 with smaller than a 228cc intake port volume. (Older ARE heads but fairly recent port design)
(Current ARE heads are in the 320-330 range on the intake)
My heads were good for 124mph traps at 3500+ pounds and 11.1 ETs spinning through half of first gear on slicks. 10's@125 was only a slick change away. stock waterpump, no shortbelt etc.
My point is that you can make huge power with heads that only flow 285-295cfm.
Last edited by Chris ARE 360; 02-13-2004 at 09:30 PM.
02-13-2004, 11:11 PM
#29
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: "Tr"Asheville
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
this is good info, I've been running the stage III heads for a month now, haven't lost to anyone yet 
still need tuning tho and bigger exhaust (restriction right now)
-Sly
still need tuning tho and bigger exhaust (restriction right now)-Sly
02-14-2004, 07:08 AM
#32
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ok you still seem to have skipped the question of was it flowed on a 3.90 bore? Mainly what kind of bench was it. It's good to see something positive about these heads finally.
02-14-2004, 09:22 AM
#35
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: "Tr"Asheville
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Fast SS on TNT
Terry....I will be placing my order on March 12 (corporate bonus day). You da man!! This is LS1 **** for me!!! I may have a chubb right now.
from a 60 roll to 100.-Sly
02-14-2004, 11:41 AM
#36
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Indiana
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by slyws6
Dude your weird...lol nah, this thing is pretty much the same for me. All I know is I love these heads. They helped me put 7-10 cars on a foxbody with H/C/I and a 96-98 cobra with who knows what mods last night from a 60 roll to 100.
-Sly
from a 60 roll to 100.-Sly
Damn you make me jealous! Mine won't be here until tuesday
Terry at Patriot Perfromance 
02-14-2004, 04:30 PM
#38
6 Second Club Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lombard .IL
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Pro Stock John
Wow Mike @ HiFlo got those numbers, very impressive. He's a hard man to impress.
02-14-2004, 05:08 PM
#39
Teching In
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Two quick questions:
-Were the two heads (PP's & TEA's) flowed on the same size bore fixture?
-How did the TEA exhaust port compare with the PP exhaust port. (I assume they were both flowed with a pipe)
-Were the two heads (PP's & TEA's) flowed on the same size bore fixture?
-How did the TEA exhaust port compare with the PP exhaust port. (I assume they were both flowed with a pipe)