Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: What cam to run with ported 799 heads?
Keep current cam, just get the heads on and save $$$
5
29.41%
Look for a used cam to buy trade for almost zero $$$ loss
0
0%
Order custom EPS cam, sell old cam/heads, and some out of pocket $$$
12
70.59%
Voters: 17. You may not vote on this poll

Keep cam or upgrade with ported/milled 243/799 heads?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-17-2011, 06:39 AM
  #61  
Launching!
iTrader: (6)
 
gtotoocool1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: northern indiana
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by thunderstruck507
Well to be clear I am looking at swapping heads AND cam.

To the guy who said rod bolts and spin it higher, my HP peaks at under 6000rpm and I'm shifting at 6300 as is, tried spinning higher and MPH didn't increase.

My last track slip:

DA 1842, race weight within 50lbs of 3700#

60 ft: 1.7776 (approx half throttle for a few feet out then stabbed it, track wouldn't hold WOT launch even on 325/50r15 MT ET streets)
330ft: 5.0621
1/8th: 7.8091
trap: 89.55
1000: 10.2091
trap: 101.81
1/4: 12.2473
trap:110.38


On the dyno it made a measily 345rwhp/325rwtq unlocked, exhaust capped. I will post the dyno sheet Monday, I can scan it at work.


I am happy with the converter since I do daily drive the car. I want more power in general because the car doesn't perform as well as I would like from a roll. Only able to put a car and a half on a stock EVO X on the highway.


I have looked over my engine up and down for reasons why it would make such little power and found nothing, posted several times here on tech with no new ideas.
12.20s at a race weight of about 3700lbs?dude,that isn't bad at all.your putting more power to the pavement than you think.
A4s with high stall converters generally don't show impressive dyno numbers,especially unlocked.don't worry about dyno numbers,it's what you run at the track that counts.
Old 03-17-2011, 07:42 AM
  #62  
Old School Heavy
iTrader: (16)
 
speedtigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,830
Received 64 Likes on 36 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by thunderstruck507
60 ft: 1.7776 (approx half throttle for a few feet out then stabbed it, track wouldn't hold WOT launch even on 325/50r15 MT ET streets)
330ft: 5.0621
1/8th: 7.8091
trap: 89.55
1000: 10.2091
trap: 101.81
1/4: 12.2473
trap:110.38


On the dyno it made a measily 345rwhp/325rwtq unlocked, exhaust capped. I will post the dyno sheet Monday, I can scan it at work.
I don't put much weight on the dyno numbers. The race track is my favorite dyno. You can use this calculator to see how much power you really make:
http://www.hotrodpitstop.com/tools.html
According to the drag race calculator, 110.38 MPH in the quarter @ 3700 lbs is equal to 388.35 horsepower. If you car weights 3750, that put's you at 393 HP. Those is pretty common numbers posted on LS1Tech.com for a cam only LS1 with your size cam.
Old 03-17-2011, 09:13 AM
  #63  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
MM98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Okc,OK
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
Where do poeple get this info
It is all about combination and rpm powerband desired.
That is a RS cam, 90/90, 243 heads ported stock valves,
cam 230/228 110-1LSA
I actually got if from skimming through your old reverse split thread.

Here you go:


Originally Posted by Patrick G
When you have a really good exhaust and are somewhat intake restricted, reverse splits make a lot of sense. A perfect example is when you're running stock heads with LS6 intake and long tube headers with off-road exhaust. A single pattern cam or reverse split cam works great there.
Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
once you go hi flow ported heads and 90/90, themn you can benefit more from traditional splits.
I understand that was back in what 07' & things may have changed since then. I just haven't really kept up with RS cams in a few years.. No harm no foul

Last edited by MM98; 03-17-2011 at 09:25 AM.
Old 03-17-2011, 09:48 AM
  #64  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
thunderstruck507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest AR
Posts: 8,358
Received 26 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

Thanks guys.

I thought all those calculators meant crank HP assuming a 15% loss unless otherwise specified.

If they are all referring to rwhp I have been annoyed over nothing.
Old 03-17-2011, 09:51 AM
  #65  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
thunderstruck507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest AR
Posts: 8,358
Received 26 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
Where do poeple get this info
It is all about combination and rpm powerband desired.
That is a RS cam, 90/90, 243 heads ported stock valves,
cam 230/228 110-1LSA
Is that your "El Torro" specced cam? I was always impressed with that grind.

What lobes/lift does it use?
Old 03-17-2011, 10:00 AM
  #66  
Launching!
iTrader: (6)
 
gtotoocool1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: northern indiana
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by thunderstruck507
Thanks guys.

I thought all those calculators meant crank HP assuming a 15% loss unless otherwise specified.

If they are all referring to rwhp I have been annoyed over nothing.
i haven't looked at those calculators in awhile,some may be rwhp,some flywheel.
i would be pretty happy with your numbers as is right now.damn respectable for just a cam only with 853s..
don't overthink this.you can add those heads,(and cam )for not a lot of money and be in the 11s!
Old 03-17-2011, 10:16 AM
  #67  
Old School Heavy
iTrader: (16)
 
speedtigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,830
Received 64 Likes on 36 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by thunderstruck507
Thanks guys.

I thought all those calculators meant crank HP assuming a 15% loss unless otherwise specified.

If they are all referring to rwhp I have been annoyed over nothing.
You know, I really don't know if it is supposed to be one or the other or something in between. My experience tells me it is something in between.
Old 03-17-2011, 10:40 AM
  #68  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
TXZ28LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Classified
Posts: 6,164
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by MM98
I actually got if from skimming through your old reverse split thread.

Here you go:




I understand that was back in what 07' & things may have changed since then. I just haven't really kept up with RS cams in a few years.. No harm no foul


Here is a dyno sheet of a cam only reverse split with a fast intake. As you can see it still made power. This along with RMTT reverse split with fast intakes show you reverse splits do still make power with a ported fast. Cant believe everything people say on this site.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...-2005-gto.html
Old 03-17-2011, 11:58 AM
  #69  
Old School Heavy
iTrader: (16)
 
speedtigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,830
Received 64 Likes on 36 Posts

Default

Here is the calculator formula we always used back in the day:

HP = ((MPH / 234)^3) * Weight

So, for you car it would be

HP = ((110.5/234)^3) * 3700

HP = ((.4722222)^3) * 3700

HP = (.105302) * 3700

HP = 389.61
Old 03-17-2011, 04:55 PM
  #70  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by thunderstruck507
Is that your "El Torro" specced cam? I was always impressed with that grind.

What lobes/lift does it use?
That is an El torro derivative yes,
.050 specs are:
230/228, .612/.588 110 LSA, 111 ICL
Old 03-17-2011, 05:02 PM
  #71  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MM98
I actually got if from skimming through your old reverse split thread.

Here you go:




I understand that was back in what 07' & things may have changed since then. I just haven't really kept up with RS cams in a few years.. No harm no foul
Originally Posted by MM98
This is great advice too! Also, if I remember correctly, the old reverse split cams where ment for the use of an LS6 intake & stock heads.. You're stepping up to ported heads & already have a Fast 90.. Why not get a better cam spec'd for this set-up?


That doesn't mean it is designed for LS6 intake & stock heads, it is not really designed for high rpms, though if properly specked, it will carry beyond 6600 easy. All within {certain} parameters.
It responds well to intake, head mods within its power range.

See same cam before heads/intake
Attached Thumbnails Keep cam or upgrade with ported/milled 243/799 heads?-rmtt-camonly.jpg  
Old 03-17-2011, 06:38 PM
  #72  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
DadsZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: deptford,new jersey
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 01ssreda4
Thats true in most cases. There is some power to be had but when comparing cams of similar specs, there wont honestly be that much difference.

Here's a Cam Motion in action:

(dont bash me for the music it aint my video)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Fssw7rCyos
What's your car run in the quarter?
Old 03-17-2011, 11:33 PM
  #73  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 0
Received 81 Likes on 72 Posts

Default

Its not my video, its Linn's video.
Old 03-18-2011, 05:26 AM
  #74  
Launching!
iTrader: (6)
 
gtotoocool1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: northern indiana
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 01ssreda4
Thats true in most cases. There is some power to be had but when comparing cams of similar specs, there wont honestly be that much difference.
like you said,in most cases that's true.but there are exceptions.the "advertised" specs only tell you so much.
in the OP's case,a cam with higher lift would take advantage of the increased airflow of the 799 heads compared to the 853s,even if the duration/overlap was the same as before.if he was keeping the same heads,the gains wouldn't be as much.it's all about the combo.
i think you could realistically see around a 50 hp gain with the swap,as long as the cam is properly matched to the heads.
Old 03-18-2011, 01:20 PM
  #75  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
TXZ28LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Classified
Posts: 6,164
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by gtotoocool1
it's all about the combo.
i think you could realistically see around a 50 hp gain with the swap,as long as the cam is properly matched to the heads.
Thats why i highly suggest that he just get a bigger converter and get the heads instead of switching out cams. I also have a reverse split cam 230/227. I have thought about changing my cam to something bigger because my car drives so smooth and so much like stock its pretty amazing. I have looked into the TSP 233/239 or a 231/237 and its not worth the swap. There was a guy that even went from his reverse split to a 228/232 and didnt gain anything.

I have asked this question to a sponsor and i would need to up it to like a Tsunami 235 size cam for example to see any gains. But then my 3200 stall that i have will be too small.

His car might perform worse with a bigger cam and a small stall that doesnt match up to his cam? So get the bigger stall, and get the heads done right. Then if your not happy then go with a bigger cam, as you will have the stall size to match it and already have great heads to go with the bigger cam.
Old 03-18-2011, 01:26 PM
  #76  
Old School Heavy
iTrader: (16)
 
speedtigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,830
Received 64 Likes on 36 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TXZ28LS1
Thats why i highly suggest that he just get a bigger converter and get the heads instead of switching out cams.
I would not go for a bigger converter in his situation. 12.20 is really very good for 110 MPH. While a 1.5 or 1.6 60 foot time is great at the track, it isnt going to happen on the street. For street guys, once you get to a certain level in your 60 foot you just can't hook that up on the street with a drag radial. If he wants to be able to take out the new Camaros and Mustangs and be a street contender, He could use about 40 to 50 more horsepower.
Old 03-18-2011, 02:11 PM
  #77  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
disc0monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: 5.0
Posts: 1,302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gtotoocool1
i think you could realistically see around a 50 hp gain with the swap,as long as the cam is properly matched to the heads.
i dont think so not without turning the motor to 6600+ rpm i am gonna guess around 35 MAX.

why do you think this?
Old 03-18-2011, 02:16 PM
  #78  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
thunderstruck507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest AR
Posts: 8,358
Received 26 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

The car is setup to handle in corners, I don't get a ton of weight transfer so it's already a struggle to hook.

I can drive it well enough on drag radials to get the job done, but as I said even at the track so far I haven't ever hooked a straight WOT stab off the line. A larger/looser converter is going to make traction worse, drivability worse, and likely further kill off top end power.

I have some other things coming up so I think I'm going to focus on getting the heads ported and put on and see how everything goes. Predator Z also suggested maybe just retarding my cam a couple degrees.

Then when I do the new engine build I can get ARP rod bolts and everything else to spin 7k rpm and get a cam matched to my car to do that. Not necessarily much bigger, just broaden the power band.

I appreciate all the advice. I will be sure to post up results. I have already picked up some ARP head bolts and just paid a member for some Patriot Gold duals. I also already have a brand new set of Felpro head gaskets.

Should I use the dual springs on the 799s or save them for later and just put my PAC beehives on?
Old 03-18-2011, 02:24 PM
  #79  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Beehives will make more power
Old 03-18-2011, 02:54 PM
  #80  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
disc0monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: 5.0
Posts: 1,302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
Beehives will make more power
here we go


Quick Reply: Keep cam or upgrade with ported/milled 243/799 heads?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:29 PM.