Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Opinions on my cam choice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-15-2011 | 06:57 PM
  #1  
moeZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 1
From: ashland, ky
Default Opinions on my cam choice

2001 SS with a lid, headers, ory, 6spd, 3.42gear

Thinking of goin with a 227/235 .614/.621 111+3 lsa LSL lobes

Street car, very little drag strip if any, not really looking to turn over 6500 or so rpms. i think this cam will work pretty good. i really just want something thats fun to drive, sounds good, and has good low and midrange punch, with a little more than stock up top.

What do you guys think of this cam? I have a very good tuner...one of the best in my opinion, so a great dyno tune will be done.

Last edited by moeZ28; 12-15-2011 at 07:09 PM.
Old 12-15-2011 | 08:58 PM
  #2  
A.R. Shale Targa's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,729
Likes: 15
From: Fredonia,WI
Default

from what you're describing the 219/227 would have better street manners
but the cam you've chosen can be tuned decent and will probably be better
mid and top end
Old 12-15-2011 | 10:44 PM
  #3  
99Bluz28's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 11
From: C. V., Kalifornia
Default

I think a smaller duration cam will put you closer to your goals. Something like a 223/223 or 223/227, 111+3 lsa with LSL lobes.
Old 12-15-2011 | 10:49 PM
  #4  
Ronny_02_WS6's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 540
Likes: 2
From: El Paso, TX
Default

227/235 .614/.621 111+3 lsa with headers sounds good, I say go for it or if not 227/231 111+2 lsa with LSL as well.

219/227 it's a bigger split so that's more for stock manifolds or forced induction cam.
Old 12-15-2011 | 10:51 PM
  #5  
Ronny_02_WS6's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 540
Likes: 2
From: El Paso, TX
Default

The driveability It's all in the tune!
Old 12-16-2011 | 12:38 PM
  #6  
moeZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 1
From: ashland, ky
Default

I daily drove a trex h/c car before with my old car and what i meant to say in the first post is i want more under the curve and streetability than my old setup. Any smaller than 227/235 and i feel i wont be happy. I want the power coming in much sooner than 4500. my old car made 453rwhp and 404tq but it was all up top.
Old 12-16-2011 | 12:58 PM
  #7  
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 10
From: Jefferson City, MO
Default

I say go for it. It's not too big to where you'll loose low end torque/power, yet it's still big enough to where you won't wish you would have went bigger. Plus, with 9 degrees of overlap, you'll get a nice choppy/rough idle, the way a true muscle car should sound. Who are you going to have grind it?
Old 12-16-2011 | 05:44 PM
  #8  
moeZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 1
From: ashland, ky
Default

Not sure yet...it might be a while before I can do a cam swap. Just getting my stuff together and deciding how much cam i want. I really thought about a 231/239 LSL which is basicly an LSL lobe version of a G5X2...but I think i want just a touch more down low...which is why I really like the 227/235. I like a nice 6-8 degree split...there are so many cams that have been proven time and time again with this pattern, seems like i cant go wrong with it.
Old 12-17-2011 | 09:55 AM
  #9  
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 10
From: Jefferson City, MO
Default

It's a solid choice. Just go for it and I'm sure you'll be happy with the results.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:47 PM.