Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

prc 215s or advanced induction 243s?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-22-2012 | 10:49 AM
  #1  
jenkns7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Default prc 215s or advanced induction 243s?

what are peoples thoughts....should i go with the prc 215s or the advanced inductions 243s
Old 02-22-2012 | 12:35 PM
  #2  
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 10
From: Jefferson City, MO
Default

What's your budget? What are your goals? Cam? Lots of questions that have to be answered before we can help you. PRC 215's are top of the line heads. The AI heads are more of a budget head, but yeild great results. Is heads/cam the end all be all, or do you plan on going FI?
Old 02-22-2012 | 01:38 PM
  #3  
1999BlueTA's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 343
Likes: 3
From: Orlando, FL
Default

^^ I agree more info needed, but if budget isn't a problem definately go prc's between the two!!!
Old 02-22-2012 | 08:19 PM
  #4  
TVWilkes's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,292
Likes: 6
From: RainbowCity,Alabama
Default

PRC 215's all the way.
Old 02-25-2012 | 04:58 PM
  #5  
gregrob's Avatar
TECH Senior Member

iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 4
From: 6,000+ feet
Default

Have you seen the cost of AI full port work for 243s? Hardly what I would call a "budget head" when you figure in the cost of sourcing a good set of 243's, or buying them new....

Last edited by gregrob; 02-25-2012 at 11:45 PM.
Old 02-25-2012 | 08:16 PM
  #6  
redtail2426's Avatar
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
From: Rochester,Ny
Default

the AI heads are very nice,i am going to be doing this head,cam combo and installing it for him.After not being able to call and talk to someone at AI,i wont email all the things i want to have answered,would be much easier if i could simply call.So after not getting the info from AI i needed i decided the prc215's would be a much better setup for this combo,givin the standard 62cc chambers.I dont want to sacrifice the ptv clearance with milling as were gonna use a thinner head gasket already for a better quench.Installing a streetsweeper high torque cam at the same time.Should be a sick combo,i want to check out a couple other head options first
Old 02-25-2012 | 11:00 PM
  #7  
Mike Morris's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
10 Year Member
iTrader: (55)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 68
From: Md/PA/FL
Default

We have to know more information-budget,goals and full mod list now and for the future...
Old 02-25-2012 | 11:07 PM
  #8  
JUSTINSWS6's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,076
Likes: 0
Default

I have stock ls1 short block 346 cu in. With 215 prc heads worked at cnc performance fast 102/102 and 233/239 112 lsa cam made 475rwhp and 421rwtq through a a4
Old 02-26-2012 | 12:55 AM
  #9  
02_Orange_D1SC's Avatar
formerly twolow02fransen (2014-1-2)

iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
From: mASSHOLE
Default

the prc 215s are a nice set of heads i was goin to run them but i did the AI 226 243 heads instead one of the biggest reasons i didn't run the prc 215s is the price
Old 02-26-2012 | 01:07 AM
  #10  
garygnu's Avatar
TECH Senior Member

 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,446
Likes: 4
Default

I would go with the PRC heads with a custom cam.
Old 02-26-2012 | 03:31 AM
  #11  
jenkns7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Default

I honestly don't care too much about budget I'm looking quality..the motor is stock except for slp airbox and pacesetter long tubes no cats gmmg exhaust with qtp cut out. Like retail said we will. E installing the streetsweeper high torque..from my understandings it's a sick cam..my friend runs it in his 02 z06 with ported ls6 heads and runs 440rwhp
Old 02-26-2012 | 03:35 AM
  #12  
01ssreda4's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 83
From: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Default

Originally Posted by Mike Morris
We have to know more information-budget,goals and full mod list now and for the future...
I agree with this....

But as far as AI, I bought a set of their 226cc 799s, or rather sent my 799s in, and the work was outstanding. I emailed back and forth over the course of a couple of weeks and we covered all the details as we went. Couldn't have asked for a better overall experience. Hell they milled my heads during the weekend. They got them Friday afternoon, and they were back on the truck headed to me by Monday or Tuesday....I had $400 in my heads and $995 for the port work. I think that is the best $1395 you can spend on a set of cylinder heads for an LS1.
Old 02-26-2012 | 08:12 AM
  #13  
SWEET98SS's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,349
Likes: 2
From: Syracuse, NY
Default

I am going to have my 853's ported by AI, they are on their way there now. I am going for the 219cc HCR port job.
Old 04-04-2012 | 02:01 AM
  #14  
01ssreda4's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 83
From: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Default

https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...-cnc-work.html
Old 04-04-2012 | 09:31 AM
  #15  
Advanced Induction's Avatar
FormerVendor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 323
Likes: 4
From: Concord, NC
Smile

Originally Posted by Rise of the Phoenix
What's your budget? What are your goals? Cam? Lots of questions that have to be answered before we can help you. PRC 215's are top of the line heads. The AI heads are more of a budget head, but yeild great results. Is heads/cam the end all be all, or do you plan on going FI?
I sell the highest end machine work available to the public. It may be a budget head, but it is most assuredly not budget work.

Not spending $ on castings, valves, etc. when the OEM parts are as good or superior is how the pricing is so low - all of your $ goes into the one thing that makes the difference in the end, which is the machine work applied. Most guys like the OEM head in street cars since they don't add weight above the CG, don't have bronze guides which exhibit a fraction of the OEM guide life, work well with OE rockers (the best HR rocker available), and tend to have much lighter valves. With aftermarket heads generally performing no better than a GM head w/ good machine work, it is tough to compete with them when most guys just want a long term reliable hot rod. Good luck w/ your project!

-Phil
Old 04-04-2012 | 10:48 AM
  #16  
BruceBufferTA's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: Undisclosed fight club underground
Default

Originally Posted by Rise of the Phoenix
What's your budget? What are your goals? Cam? Lots of questions that have to be answered before we can help you. PRC 215's are top of the line heads. The AI heads are more of a budget head, but yeild great results. Is heads/cam the end all be all, or do you plan on going FI?
Originally Posted by gregrob
Have you seen the cost of AI full port work for 243s? Hardly what I would call a "budget head" when you figure in the cost of sourcing a good set of 243's, or buying them new....
Exactly what Greg said. The problem with most people "like what rise of the phoenix replied" is, they don't speak from experience. They speak from stupidity. AI is far from a budget head and I would put my bankroll on it they would net more gains than the PRC if the same work was being done.
Old 04-04-2012 | 11:38 AM
  #17  
Sales4@Texas-Speed's Avatar
LS1TECH & Trucks Sponsor

iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 8
Default

IMO its very hard to compare a stock casting head to an aftermarket casting head. If you are looking for a top of the line ported aftermarket casting the PRC 215s are a great way to go. The smaller runner, smaller combustion chamber and larger valve combination make it very hard for a stock ported casting to keep up, especially in the low end. Our heads are designed to accept a stock rocker, so that is not a worry. If you have any questions at all don't hesitate to get a hold of me or any of the other sales guys up here.
Old 04-04-2012 | 01:22 PM
  #18  
96capricemgr's Avatar
11 Second Club

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 13
Default

Here is a comparison of "superior" aftermarket heads to the AI 243s.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...-gm-5-3-a.html
Old 04-04-2012 | 02:50 PM
  #19  
Jason 98 TA's Avatar
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,229
Likes: 2
From: Texas!
Default

There's no way to properly compare a stock casting to a aftermarket casting head. the aftermarket casting heads have so many advantages its not a good comparison.

If your looking for a max effort 3.9" bore head look at the PRC 227 heads. They move HUGE air on a 3.9" bore & power the fastest stock bottom end car in the country.

if your on a budget then look to the AI or PRC cnc ported LS6 heads. That is a comparison that makes more sense.

The PRC heads are fully cnc ported, come with PRC springs, manley valves, and get cnc valve job from newen seat & guide machines.

Absolutely nobody offers a LS head built with better components or machinery than the PRC heads.

We absolutely stand behind our heads so much that we are constantly sending our heads out to magazines for cylinder head shootouts. Side By Side testing is the best way to determine which heads are top performers
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Old 04-04-2012 | 03:26 PM
  #20  
venom ws7's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,965
Likes: 1
From: EARTH
Default

We've made 469rwhp 346 Boltons,PRC 215 with mild cam on GTO after that owner went with TSP 414ci with same head and LS7R cam made 529rwhp

I had nothing but awesome results from all TSP products.
Thanks guys.


Quick Reply: prc 215s or advanced induction 243s?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:36 AM.