Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Build Thread: 376ci Iron Block

Old Apr 1, 2012 | 10:06 AM
  #21  
KCS's Avatar
KCS
Thread Starter
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 8,859
Likes: 323
From: Conroe, TX
Default

Originally Posted by gtotoocool1
ahh,you did open them up to 90% of the valve diameter then.just that and the right VJ really wakes up the flow,more than most people realize(or some porters will admit to).but of course you already know this.
i'm saving up for my next toy,and my plan is to build a 6.0 and do basically what your doing.OEM heads,but with the right supporting mods.for somebody on a budget,the money is better spent on quality internals and machine work.the way i see it,why spend money on heads that flow way more air than needed for the HP goals.some very smart people have said you need just enough airflow to support your target HP,and no more.what's the ICL of your cam?IMO,most people go too big on the cam with too wide of a lobe seperation.better to go smaller with a tighter LSA to let the overlap to get the intake charge going.
The cam is installed on a 109 ICL, so it's 2 degrees advanced. I do think the cam is a little too big and a tad goofy. I was expecting the duration to be 230/232, but it is actually 235/235.

Last edited by KCS; Jun 26, 2013 at 06:12 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2012 | 06:00 PM
  #22  
gtotoocool1's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
From: northern indiana
Default

Originally Posted by KCS
The cam is installed on a 107 ICL, so it's 4 degrees advanced. I do think the cam is a little too big and a tad goofy. I was expecting the duration to be 230/232, but it is actually 235/235.
considering your cubes and bore size,i don't think it's too bad.of course thats just going off the specs at .050 lift.too lazy to do the math right now,but that cam would be like a mid to high 220s duration on a 346ci motor.depends on what you want to do with the car.going by your dyno #s id say it's a good street/strip cam.i bet the idle sounds bad ***..
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2012 | 12:43 PM
  #23  
LS6's Avatar
LS6
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
From: Cherry Hill, New Jersey State
Default

That should be sticky
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2013 | 09:08 AM
  #24  
KCS's Avatar
KCS
Thread Starter
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 8,859
Likes: 323
From: Conroe, TX
Default

UPDATE:
This last Thursday the engine developed a slight tick. The tick quickly turns into more of a hammering sound. Pop the driver side valve cover and find that one of the rocker arms puked its bearings out, and when I say puked, I mean the violent puke like you ate some bad sushi and drank a bottle of Visine. It basically exploded out the sides.



So, this engine is done. I replaced the rocker arm and will just flush the oil a few times and see how long it lasts while I build the new engine. I have most of the hard parts to build a 347ci LS1. Definitely investing in a trunion upgrade next time.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2013 | 10:48 AM
  #25  
JakeFusion's Avatar
Super Hulk Smash
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,258
Likes: 146
From: Pace, FL
Default

Damn, that sucks.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2013 | 08:07 PM
  #26  
mred's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
From: Wylie,Tx 75098
Default

Originally Posted by KCS
UPDATE:



So, this engine is done. I replaced the rocker arm and will just flush the oil a few times and see how long it lasts while I build the new engine. I have most of the hard parts to build a 347ci LS1. Definitely investing in a trunion upgrade next time.
Why is this engine done? Because of the rocker explosion?
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2013 | 08:31 PM
  #27  
oakley6575's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,613
Likes: 3
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

Originally Posted by mred
Why is this engine done? Because of the rocker explosion?
When they explode, the needle bearings go everywhere and will cause big damage. That is why a trunion upgrade is in order when using stock rockers in performance applications
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2013 | 09:25 PM
  #28  
mred's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
From: Wylie,Tx 75098
Default

Originally Posted by oakley6575
When they explode, the needle bearings go everywhere and will cause big damage. That is why a trunion upgrade is in order when using stock rockers in performance applications
I do agree with the trunion upgrade
But I disagree on the motor being done. Even if all of the needles are not accounted for I still believe that the issue is not as big as its made out to be.
Magnetic drain plug is your friend in this situation.
We accounted for 56 of the needles in our 408 and thus far no issues. At the moment
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2013 | 09:32 PM
  #29  
KCS's Avatar
KCS
Thread Starter
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 8,859
Likes: 323
From: Conroe, TX
Default

Well, the trunion spit out the bearings, but also wore a lot of fine metal grit into the engine. You can see one side of the trunion is worn pretty badly in the photo. I had planned on new heads, intake, clutch, and headers this summer anyways so now I might as well just pull it out and replace the rings and bearings as I'm 100% sure they have all kinds of crap imbedded in them.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2013 | 09:51 PM
  #30  
SS10Tech's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 209
Likes: 1
From: NC
Default

If you dont mind, can you post before and after measurements/pictures of your narrowed connecting rod crank journal bearings? That is wild, never thought of doing something like that before.

Thanks again for the ride along with the build process a year ago.

I also agree the motor is not completely done. Best to disassemble and assess from there. Might take extra time and consideration but it will allow you to better make the call. Worst comes to worst - you already have your backup plan in action
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2013 | 09:55 PM
  #31  
mred's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
From: Wylie,Tx 75098
Default

Not arguing with anyone but I will disagree again on the crud being embedded.(your rebuilding anyways)
A good filter and oil should do it's job as far as the crud goes.
But anyways good luck with the next build,glad to see you can afford to throw money it for another build lol.
We call ourselves PBR. Poor Boy Racing lol
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2013 | 10:05 PM
  #32  
BaddBird's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
From: Mo
Default

Originally Posted by KCS
Well, the trunion spit out the bearings, but also wore a lot of fine metal grit into the engine. You can see one side of the trunion is worn pretty badly in the photo. I had planned on new heads, intake, clutch, and headers this summer anyways so now I might as well just pull it out and replace the rings and bearings as I'm 100% sure they have all kinds of crap imbedded in them.
What heads you plan on going with?
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2013 | 10:44 PM
  #33  
KCS's Avatar
KCS
Thread Starter
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 8,859
Likes: 323
From: Conroe, TX
Default

Originally Posted by SS10Tech
If you dont mind, can you post before and after measurements/pictures of your narrowed connecting rod crank journal bearings? That is wild, never thought of doing something like that before.

Thanks again for the ride along with the build process a year ago.

I also agree the motor is not completely done. Best to disassemble and assess from there. Might take extra time and consideration but it will allow you to better make the call. Worst comes to worst - you already have your backup plan in action
Off the top of my head, I want to say they were about .8XX" wide and I turned them down to .630" minus the chamfer.

Originally Posted by BaddBird
What heads you plan on going with?
243's with LS3 valves.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2013 | 01:38 PM
  #34  
2000ultraZ1911's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
From: new castle PA
Default

Nice build! Great attention to detail! Can't wait for my first LS build.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2013 | 10:01 AM
  #35  
KCS's Avatar
KCS
Thread Starter
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 8,859
Likes: 323
From: Conroe, TX
Default

UPDATE:

Finally! I have a clutch on the way. I decided on a SPEC stage 1 single disc with a billet steel flywheel and new GM slave cylinder. SPEC says its rated to 599ft-lbs of torque which should be plenty. Also picked up a Comp Trunion upgrade, FAST intake and throttle body, and OBX 1-3/4" headers and Y-pipe I wanted to try out. I also picked up Proform cast valve covers which I think I will have hydrodipped in carbon fiber with "PONTIAC" in orange to match the block.

I have been working on a new set of heads too. I started with a set of 862's I had laying around and popped out the old 2.02" diameter seat inserts and installed some Melling 2.170" diameter seats. This is my R&D head before I cut into the 243 heads which will actually go on the engine. The first valvejob I cut for the 2.165" valve went 281CFM @ .700" with basically just a bowl blend that I did in a hurry.



Got another valvejob cut with a shallower bottom cut (on the right) to see of that helps pick up the numbers. Haven't opened up the throat yet or blended anything in yet, but I will get the head back on the Flowbench once I do. Hoping to have new dyno numbers and track times before the local drag strips close for the winter.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2013 | 07:59 PM
  #36  
BLK95-Z's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 687
Likes: 16
From: Ky
Default

Subscribed. Very nice work!
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2013 | 02:55 PM
  #37  
gtotoocool1's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
From: northern indiana
Default

Originally Posted by KCS
UPDATE:

Finally! I have a clutch on the way. I decided on a SPEC stage 1 single disc with a billet steel flywheel and new GM slave cylinder. SPEC says its rated to 599ft-lbs of torque which should be plenty. Also picked up a Comp Trunion upgrade, FAST intake and throttle body, and OBX 1-3/4" headers and Y-pipe I wanted to try out. I also picked up Proform cast valve covers which I think I will have hydrodipped in carbon fiber with "PONTIAC" in orange to match the block.

I have been working on a new set of heads too. I started with a set of 862's I had laying around and popped out the old 2.02" diameter seat inserts and installed some Melling 2.170" diameter seats. This is my R&D head before I cut into the 243 heads which will actually go on the engine. The first valvejob I cut for the 2.165" valve went 281CFM @ .700" with basically just a bowl blend that I did in a hurry.



Got another valvejob cut with a shallower bottom cut (on the right) to see of that helps pick up the numbers. Haven't opened up the throat yet or blended anything in yet, but I will get the head back on the Flowbench once I do. Hoping to have new dyno numbers and track times before the local drag strips close for the winter.
what are you using to do the VJ?
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2013 | 03:03 PM
  #38  
KCS's Avatar
KCS
Thread Starter
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 8,859
Likes: 323
From: Conroe, TX
Default

Originally Posted by gtotoocool1
what are you using to do the VJ?
It's an old Sunnen VGS-20, but it still gets the job done. Using Newen cutters BTW.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2013 | 04:58 PM
  #39  
gtotoocool1's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
From: northern indiana
Default

Originally Posted by KCS
It's an old Sunnen VGS-20, but it still gets the job done. Using Newen cutters BTW.
What angles and widths are you using,if i can ask?
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2013 | 05:15 PM
  #40  
KCS's Avatar
KCS
Thread Starter
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 8,859
Likes: 323
From: Conroe, TX
Default

Originally Posted by gtotoocool1
What angles and widths are you using,if i can ask?
I'd rather not say exactly, but I'll tell you the top is steeper than 35, the seat is 45 degrees x .040" wide, and the bottom is steeper than 60 on the intake. The exhaust is shallower than 60. Both have a 75 degree bowl cut underneath blended into the throat.

The big valve head I think I'm going to run the exhaust cutter on the intake too and mix it up with a 70 and 75 so as to make the transition less abrupt.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:22 AM.