Got in an argument with my Chem teacher about internal flame temperatures, back me up
#1
Got in an argument with my Chem teacher about internal flame temperatures, back me up
My chem teacher who was a manager for Chevron was trying to tell me engines only get to around 900 degrees F but I swear when I went to school for auto I thought I remembered my teacher saying that above 4,300 or so degrees NOx are produced like crazy. Can't an ls1 engine with forced induction at WOT get a 4000 degree flame front without pinging? Does anybody know the actual flame temperatures? My book says NOx are the result of combustion temperatures reaching more than 2,500 F.
#3
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
Might discuss circumstances with him. I often find that when two knowledgeable people are disagreeing so drastically on a point they can both be right in one way or another.
I am sure gas burns at different temps be it open flame, cruise, WOT or WOT boosted.
I would narrow the discussion to a particular circumstance.
I am sure gas burns at different temps be it open flame, cruise, WOT or WOT boosted.
I would narrow the discussion to a particular circumstance.
#6
Staging Lane
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Finleyville
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think compression ratio, fuel type and intake air temperature are a factor with combustion temperatures.
I have noticed on my truck the higher my IAT the quicker my EGTs climb and the higher they go. I have seen them get to almost 1700 before which is normal for a fuel only duramax. I wouldn't imagine a gas motor being any different.
I have noticed on my truck the higher my IAT the quicker my EGTs climb and the higher they go. I have seen them get to almost 1700 before which is normal for a fuel only duramax. I wouldn't imagine a gas motor being any different.
#7
Thanks for the replies guys, always good to hear from everyone. Yea I will talk to him some more on specifics but he was saying I had no sense because the melting point of iron he said was about 2,500. I think the reason it doesn't melt is because it just doesn't have enough time, and also because we use ceramic alloys with higher melting temperatures. I have always wondered what our stock ceramic alloys melt at. Hmm
Trending Topics
#9
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
I have no doubt the actual burn is very hot, but the trhee revolutions without a combustion event allow a lot of cooling. I wonder if he may be saying that the surface temperatures in the chamber rarely exceed 900F, which woul dbe a much more resonable set of circumstances.
#10
TECH Senior Member
When a burn proceeds normally (i.e. without detonating) the flame front contains most of the the heat behind it, this keeps the combustion chamber surface temperature lower than the burn temperature, so the melting point of Aluminum (heads and pistons) is not an issue.