Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Haven't heard much from afr lately? Still dyno testing?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-14-2004, 03:14 AM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
ssvincels1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Haven't heard much from afr lately? Still dyno testing?

title says it all, just waiting PATIENTLY!!!
Old 04-14-2004, 11:50 AM
  #2  
Staging Lane
 
jtz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Deto
Old 04-14-2004, 12:17 PM
  #3  
z98
TECH Fanatic
 
z98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Deto
*blink blink*

I think everyone is excited about them. Especially the FI guys.
Old 04-14-2004, 12:35 PM
  #4  
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
 
Fenster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am interested to see how they perform when ported. IMO they may perform about like an average set of stage 2 LS1 heads out of the box, but when ported they will really shine cause of the added material they will have over a stock casting...
Old 04-14-2004, 12:50 PM
  #5  
TECH Veteran
 
robertbartsch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Hartsdale, NY
Posts: 4,055
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Didn't someone say they are having diffuculty beating the flows on stock ported heads....??

after all the hype, they better significantly out flow ported factory heads....
Old 04-14-2004, 01:10 PM
  #6  
TECH Junkie
 
verbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: At the office
Posts: 3,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by robertbartsch
Didn't someone say they are having diffuculty beating the flows on stock ported heads....??
I've heard this myself as a matter of fact
Old 04-14-2004, 01:17 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
 
kumar75150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by robertbartsch
Didn't someone say they are having diffuculty beating the flows on stock ported heads....??

have you heard about velocity, chamber size, etc?
Old 04-14-2004, 01:20 PM
  #8  
z98
TECH Fanatic
 
z98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If they don't run the # velocity and chamber size don't mean much to us.

If the 225's don't outflow a nice stage 2 LS6 I'm not sure what the point is.

Honestly, I'm not sure why they did the 205's first. Big numbers sell stuff like this.
Old 04-14-2004, 02:21 PM
  #9  
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
 
Fenster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think that their market is really going to be the guys who buy the heads, and them port them. The stock casting heads are reaching a top limit really. If the AFR heads flow similar out of the box to stock port jobs, then can be ported to add more cfm on top of that, then they will have a niche in the market for that reason.
Old 04-14-2004, 03:01 PM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
 
DenzSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

As long as they have a thicker deck and we can choose the chamber size, I don't really care what they flow.

As far as velocity goes, I'm as concerned about it as I am the flow rates.
Old 04-14-2004, 03:37 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Cstraub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tri-Cities, TN
Posts: 1,378
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

I'm glad some of you don't build engines for a living...or manufacture parts. It takes alot of time to do it right.

Chris
Old 04-14-2004, 06:58 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Phate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Northridge, CA
Posts: 1,356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah, I am more looking at the thicker castings...tired of all the FI guys having to deal with the head lifting issues.
Old 04-14-2004, 07:11 PM
  #13  
Adkoonerstrator
iTrader: (4)
 
XLR8NSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Deep in the seedy underworld of Koonerville
Posts: 21,420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Scott 98Z M6
Yeah, I am more looking at the thicker castings...tired of all the FI guys having to deal with the head lifting issues.
I hope the thicker decks work well for the FI crowd.
Old 04-14-2004, 08:26 PM
  #14  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
 
SScam68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Albuquerque NM - The Land of 8000ft DA
Posts: 2,686
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Cstraub
I'm glad some of you don't build engines for a living...or manufacture parts. It takes alot of time to do it right.

Chris
AMEN!!!!!
Old 04-14-2004, 09:43 PM
  #15  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (15)
 
LOnSLO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Gainesville, GA
Posts: 2,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DenzSS
As long as they have a thicker deck and we can choose the chamber size, I don't really care what they flow.
Amen on that one
Old 04-14-2004, 10:21 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
rons 00z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: omaha, NE
Posts: 1,004
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

holy cow you guys are a tough crowd to beat. peak numbers dont mean jack. gain through out the rpm band is what allows better performance.
Old 04-14-2004, 10:57 PM
  #17  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
ataylors's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

For me it sure didnt help when they posted that weak dyno of the stock head vs. their heads. To bad it wasnt a straight swap, they had to add a cam, intake, and TB. WTF is that garbage???




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:05 AM.