Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

224/228 worth swaping to 222/230 L92

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-10-2012, 08:38 AM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
jaydub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default 224/228 worth swaping to 222/230 L92

Hey guys this is my first post so bear with me, I have a 71 chevelle with LQ9/L92 combo, hooker long tubes and mentioned 224/228 .581 .588. I'm eyeing the EPS cam 222/230 cam with some advance ground into it hoping it will help my low end lugging, car pull pretty good above 3k but around town it's a dog. In the end I want the car to be more responsive, more low end torque, so what are my options can I advance the cam I have or should I swap to the eps cam. the duration change is somewhat minimal but the eps will have some advance ground into it.


More details about setup

4l60e
2500 stall
3.55 gears
114 LSA
10.4 compression
L92 heads stock no milling done
Old 12-10-2012, 08:51 AM
  #2  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Sales@Tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mount Airy, NC
Posts: 7,480
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Not worth the change. A change of 1-2 degrees will not do anything, but maybe move the curve 100-200rpm's and 2-5rwhp at the absolute most.

If you want more power down low with those heads you need something like this:

273/285@.006"
223/235@.050"
147/158@.200"

110LSA 108ICL 112ECL

223/235 .610"/.621" 110+2
Edit: cam was supposed to be 223/235 .610"/.621" 110+2
Old 12-10-2012, 09:04 AM
  #3  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
thunderstruck507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest AR
Posts: 8,357
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

If your car is a "dog" with the current set up you need to figure out why. The only thing that even appears remotely out of place is the low stall converter but it should still work decent with the rest of that combo.

Fuel injected or carbed? How sure are you of the tune either way?
Old 12-10-2012, 09:10 AM
  #4  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
jaydub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

setup is FI
LS3 intake
LS3 Injectors
Old 12-10-2012, 09:16 AM
  #5  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Sales@Tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mount Airy, NC
Posts: 7,480
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by thunderstruck507
If your car is a "dog" with the current set up you need to figure out why. The only thing that even appears remotely out of place is the low stall converter but it should still work decent with the rest of that combo.

Fuel injected or carbed? How sure are you of the tune either way?
I agree.

OP cam change isn't worth it for that small of a swing in events. I think there is something else wrong or off with your set-up. A 3500 stall would make it much more responsive from putting it into a higher powered portion of your power band quicker than having to wait for your current 2500 stall to get to the "meat" of your power band.
Old 12-10-2012, 10:01 AM
  #6  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (5)
 
redtan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Belmont, MA
Posts: 3,764
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

If you want more responsiveness down low under 3,000 rpm then you should either get gears or increase compression.
Old 12-10-2012, 10:25 AM
  #7  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
thunderstruck507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest AR
Posts: 8,357
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

Make sure there are no mechanical issues then make sure the car has plenty of low end timing and the air fuel is decent.

I made some changes on the timing table in my mostly stock 5.3 truck and the low end gains were quite noticeable.
Old 12-10-2012, 01:10 PM
  #8  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
jaydub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

in my opinion i think the car is mechanically sound, has good power can smoke the tires with ease 8K miles so far on setup no issues. its just the around the town stop light to stop light that i have a complaint with maybe i'm being picky i know there is some compromise with having a cam, just thought a cam with some advance ground into it or advancing my current cam would help.



Quick Reply: 224/228 worth swaping to 222/230 L92



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:13 PM.