New Tick Cams
Danno74z
Danno74Z
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Thanks,
Dan
ANYWAYS! I have not had one customer install a SNS Stage 1 into a F-body or any car for that matter. All of them have gone in lifted trucks, dune buggy style off-road vehicles and I even have 2 SNS Stage 1 camshafts in rock crawlers. The only problem is those guys don't care about dynos or racing LOL! I just get information like, "it's using more fuel in our fuel map or it feels great over the stock cam!
If I had some imperative data to share that had some real world results to go with it you guys would be and will be the first to know!
The TM Stg. 2 really is an awesome all around camshaft which is why so many opt for the Stg. 2. It hits a lick at idle that everyone wants whether they admit it or not, has consistently made 420-430rwtq in stock stroke 3.89-4.0" bore engines(no not horsepower TORQUE) with CNC ported heads and pulls like a freight train all the way to 6700rpm. How can you go wrong with something like that?
Thank you for replying to my original question/link. It's a little sad nobody has ordered a SNS stage 1 for their F-body - maybe me, but I have to admit I'm a bit of a chicken
You mentioned in a previous link (Sorry I can't remember which one as they start to blur together) about "issues" with the higher lift cams and you were looking into it. I believe it was related to noise and lifter failure. I have been studying GM's OEM cams and everyone for the LS engines stays below .600 lift. I'm not saying this is good or bad but just an observation. Something happens beyond this level of lift and naturally it is a trade off I'm sure - Emissions, idle, power or a combination. Always is. I might have to order a custom cam - imagine that! 






