NEW UPDATE WITH BETTER VIDEO & DYNO RESULTS! Finally done with heads and cam swap!!!
05-15-2013, 08:02 PM
#42
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Clewiston , Fl
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Very nice numbers Arturo!!!!!!!! 430/390 on a Mustang Dyno is awesome with a stock LS6 intake through a 9" and 4.11's!
Torque curve looks very nice as well! 350rwtq on a stang dyno at 3400rpm is awesome!
On average you can add 5-10% to convert MD numbers to a Dyno Jet, but I say take it to the track and beat the SNOT out of it!
P.S. Arturo,
It looks like the power would of continued to carry well past 6500rpm. I would start shifting it at the track there(6500rpm) and then go up to 6700, and even 6900rpm to see what it does to the MPH.
Nate,
We normally see 5-10rwhp for a SD tune over a MAF tune.
Torque curve looks very nice as well! 350rwtq on a stang dyno at 3400rpm is awesome!
On average you can add 5-10% to convert MD numbers to a Dyno Jet, but I say take it to the track and beat the SNOT out of it!
P.S. Arturo,
It looks like the power would of continued to carry well past 6500rpm. I would start shifting it at the track there(6500rpm) and then go up to 6700, and even 6900rpm to see what it does to the MPH.
Nate,
We normally see 5-10rwhp for a SD tune over a MAF tune.
05-16-2013, 09:08 AM
#48
12 Second Club
iTrader: (31)
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sounds good! Have you tried going to 6700-6800 yet? Im hoping to get my car back today from the tuner but I wont be able to get dyno numbers for another month.
05-16-2013, 07:41 PM
#51
His heads are only .004" difference in P to V when comparing them to a stock 243 head. The valve drop with a set of stock valved 243 heads is the same as a set of 241 heads. That said, his P to V in reality is only .004" less than a LS1 with a set of stock un milled 241's would have.
With this cam and this set-up P to V is no issue what so ever.
Sounds great Arturo!!! Now get me some track times and dyno numbers!!!
With this cam and this set-up P to V is no issue what so ever.
Sounds great Arturo!!! Now get me some track times and dyno numbers!!!
Nice! I will be giving you folks a call soon
Awesome #'s OP, specially for a 9"
05-16-2013, 08:27 PM
#52
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Clewiston , Fl
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks & Martin is the man to talk to!
05-17-2013, 12:11 PM
#53
I'm glad your so happy with it Tury. I'm going to hound you until you put that drive shaft on it and take it to the track! You don't have a 9" and 4.11's for nothing!!!
I'd be willing to guarantee that with a set of 28x10.50" slicks, a 6000rpm launch off the two step and a great clutch release that a 1.40-1.45 60' can be had and with that 60' a 10.80-10.90@124-125 can be achieved.
I'd be willing to guarantee that with a set of 28x10.50" slicks, a 6000rpm launch off the two step and a great clutch release that a 1.40-1.45 60' can be had and with that 60' a 10.80-10.90@124-125 can be achieved.
05-17-2013, 01:13 PM
#54
Sounds really good turyg!!!, Hey martin, do you think my numbers would be around the same, I have about his same mods but I have ported 799's and he listed his cam with less degrees in the exhaust side, is that because of the grind??? Also how big of a difference is going from 239 to 242 lobe duration in the exhaust. (powerwise)???
05-17-2013, 03:41 PM
#56
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Clewiston , Fl
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm glad your so happy with it Tury. I'm going to hound you until you put that drive shaft on it and take it to the track! You don't have a 9" and 4.11's for nothing!!!
I'd be willing to guarantee that with a set of 28x10.50" slicks, a 6000rpm launch off the two step and a great clutch release that a 1.40-1.45 60' can be had and with that 60' a 10.80-10.90@124-125 can be achieved.
I'd be willing to guarantee that with a set of 28x10.50" slicks, a 6000rpm launch off the two step and a great clutch release that a 1.40-1.45 60' can be had and with that 60' a 10.80-10.90@124-125 can be achieved.
Sounds really good turyg!!!, Hey martin, do you think my numbers would be around the same, I have about his same mods but I have ported 799's and he listed his cam with less degrees in the exhaust side, is that because of the grind??? Also how big of a difference is going from 239 to 242 lobe duration in the exhaust. (powerwise)???
Last edited by turyg ls1; 05-17-2013 at 03:46 PM.
05-17-2013, 06:00 PM
#57
Sounds really good turyg!!!, Hey martin, do you think my numbers would be around the same, I have about his same mods but I have ported 799's and he listed his cam with less degrees in the exhaust side, is that because of the grind??? Also how big of a difference is going from 239 to 242 lobe duration in the exhaust. (powerwise)???
What does this do you ask? Your cam will make for a slightly broader power curve than the LS2 from the added overlap. Your cam also closes the intake valve sooner which will make for more torque under the curve, but not carry it quite as far as the LS2 with it's later event. The LS2 has a later EVO event which will build more bottom end torque and peak torque, but not carry torque quite as far into the RPM range as the LS1's earlier EVO event.
So as you can see they both have their pro's and con's, but if you notice their pro's and con's compliment one another. I didn't just spec these cams ***** nilly, I had a systematic approach. I wanted them to all fill a certain void and not have two cams that perform so close to one another that there is no point in having two separate camshaft profiles.
I would go with a Mickey Thompson 28x10.50" ET Street Bias Ply stiff sidewall slick. With tubes preferably.
05-17-2013, 11:27 PM
#59
12 Second Club
iTrader: (31)
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Id like to put it on the dyno, but I assume there will be tons of people trying to get their car dyno'd and I dont know if its worth the wait. Are you planning on going to KC2k13?
[QUOTE=Martin@Tick;17408159]
Justin is a good tuner too. I'd do that for sure Ross.
I actually had Ryan Mitchell (MaxxMitchell on the fourm) do a street tune on the car for now. It pulls hard but on the 100shot it really moves! Ill try to get some better videos up soon.