Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

799 Cylinder head question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-31-2013, 12:55 AM
  #21  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (21)
 
Kingc8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 4,558
Received 51 Likes on 42 Posts

Default

Damn I wish you could get 243s around here for $200-300, everyone seems to want $400-500...
Old 05-31-2013, 04:45 AM
  #22  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

799 are exactly the same and can be had cheaper.
Old 05-31-2013, 08:11 AM
  #23  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
badazz81z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
799 are exactly the same and can be had cheaper.
Well not exactly...The casting process is different on the 243s. The 799s are a rougher cast, but when CNC ported, it doesn't matter.
Old 05-31-2013, 08:16 AM
  #24  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
badazz81z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by codyvette
I didn't say it wasn't out there or that 243's don't make more power (minisculy after c&c and bigger valves) . I simply asked if y'all know where I can see actual evidence of this exact situation $ for $. They no dought make considerable more power in stock form such as the Z06.I am not stupid just looking for info. Don't try to be a smart ***.
What are you looking for? 100% of the folks here can vouch for it. 241s are not the hidden secret...You can't even give a set away. I had a brand new set and couldn't even get the dollar a set of used 243s go for. Texas Speed or Vengeance would most likely have a side by side dyno, but most of us use what works and not try to re-invent the wheel. The power #s alone on the factory engines give you a clue on what power they make. Don't get me wrong, a nice set of CNC ported 241s will perform well and make good power, but an equal modded 243 head will make more power for the same $$
Old 05-31-2013, 09:17 AM
  #25  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,853
Received 314 Likes on 212 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by codyvette
Can you show us dyno results and or drag strip result in like D/A and temp between a set of C&C ported 241's with over sized valves and milling against a set of like 243's on a stock short block? All I have found is comparisons on larger cubic inch motors and after market heads. I am always on a learning curve, no matter how much I think I know it all. Seriously though, I am not the knower of all LS, but I like to see actual results that pertain to the exact situation.
Probably not, at least not as true A-B-A testing. I have plenty of graphs from different combos with different heads, but cams will be different and so will exhaust systems, transmissions, and any and every other part you could pick at to dispute the results.

I have plenty of testing and experience to show that 243 heads produce better results that 241's, as well as many others who've been at this stuff for a while, but to have it all neatly presented and wrapped up in a nice pretty little bow probably ain't gonna happen.

Originally Posted by Kingc8r
Damn I wish you could get 243s around here for $200-300, everyone seems to want $400-500...
$200-300 more. Most cathedral port heads other than the 243/799's will go for about $100-150 on average. I paid $350 for my 243 heads, and $125 for a set of 862 heads.
Old 05-31-2013, 06:16 PM
  #26  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 8,139
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by codyvette
Don't buy either if you are going with aftermarket valves, C&C porting,& milling.doing those three things is going to eliminate all the advantages a 243 or 799 have in stock trim. 799 heads do not have the sodium filler valves anyhow. Not even all 243's do. Only if they came off of a Z06. After the C&C and other work 241's are just as good.
The 243/799's have a better designed chamber and exhaust port. They will still be a superior head apples for apples compared to a 241 or similar.
Old 05-31-2013, 09:35 PM
  #27  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by badazz81z28
Well not exactly...The casting process is different on the 243s. The 799s are a rougher cast, but when CNC ported, it doesn't matter.
Man, same runners, same valves, same chamber size = same output.
BTW, same CNC program
Old 06-01-2013, 12:13 PM
  #28  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (5)
 
96lt4c4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 963
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Man, I keep having to post this. http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/e...t/viewall.html
Buy some 243's or 799's and send them to your favorite porter. Sent mine to TEA. Per this article they made same power if not more than a lot of name brand, high dollar heads.
Old 06-01-2013, 05:56 PM
  #29  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
badazz81z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
Man, same runners, same valves, same chamber size = same output.
BTW, same CNC program
Like I said in stock form not exactly. After CNC work, than you can say the ports are exactly the same.

243a have small triangle marks below every spark plug hole. The marks are left by "chills" used during the casting process in GM's semi-permanent mold tooling. Of the three casting facilities that make Gen III cylinder heads, two use SPM tooling, the other heads are sand-cast. The SPM tools produce heads with very smooth, consistent ports and chambers which consistently dyno at least 4 to 7 hp better than the sand-cast heads. #799 heads are sand casted...



Old 06-01-2013, 06:35 PM
  #30  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
RonSSNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,600
Received 700 Likes on 441 Posts

Default

My 799's (06 5.3) are quite smooth in the runners and chambers. Even if your pair isn't, easily remedied with a little sanding roll work.

If you read the article I posted earlier, you will see GM changed the intake port quite a lot. I find it difficult to believe that AI removes the material GM added. But I haven't seen any AI heads in person, so I can't say.

Ron
Old 06-01-2013, 11:04 PM
  #31  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (24)
 
codyvette's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Brazoria TX
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by badazz81z28
What are you looking for? 100% of the folks here can vouch for it. 241s are not the hidden secret...You can't even give a set away. I had a brand new set and couldn't even get the dollar a set of used 243s go for. Texas Speed or Vengeance would most likely have a side by side dyno, but most of us use what works and not try to re-invent the wheel. The power #s alone on the factory engines give you a clue on what power they make. Don't get me wrong, a nice set of CNC ported 241s will perform well and make good power, but an equal modded 243 head will make more power for the same $$
Once again, I am not talking about factory power. I also didn't say 241 was superior. I will stick to my guns until I see dyno results from the same stock rotating assembly tested with each head after C&C, bigger valves and milled to 11:1 compression. You are arguing points that I am not trying to make.



Quick Reply: 799 Cylinder head question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:30 AM.