Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Mast LS3 Small Bore Heads

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-11-2014, 11:55 AM
  #61  
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Titokang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: texas
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Exactly phoenix, whatever ed recommends for his cam is what I'll run. Mchicia, your car still runs damn good!
Old 01-11-2014, 06:22 PM
  #62  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (5)
 
mchicia1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Titokang
Exactly phoenix, whatever ed recommends for his cam is what I'll run. Mchicia, your car still runs damn good!
Ya not too bad, thanks . Blower is going on later so it won't really make a difference anyway ha.
Old 01-12-2014, 12:38 PM
  #63  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Where did you get your MAST heads from?
Old 01-12-2014, 02:11 PM
  #64  
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Titokang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: texas
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

http://paceperformance.com/i-5145679...re-single.html they are sponsors on here
Old 01-12-2014, 05:16 PM
  #65  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (5)
 
mchicia1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Nice, thank you.
Old 01-13-2014, 05:40 AM
  #66  
TECH Resident
 
Ed Curtis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Working in the shop 24/7
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by mchicia1
Only 2300 for the masts? Damn, when I was looking at the small bores all I could find was a $3300 price, which is why I went with the budget BSPs.

If I knew about these for $2300 I would have picked them up.

That's castings and valves for roughly $2400 a pair. You have to add in the spring package and rocker stands to get a total price. Of course, valve spring choice can add a little (or a lot) to that end price.


Old 01-13-2014, 07:28 AM
  #67  
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Titokang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: texas
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Yup, pace also has the assembled heads for 1230 a piece with standard ss valves, and beehives. All you'd need is stands which are 80-90 a set, 8 offset rockers and your golden pony boy.
Old 01-13-2014, 08:14 AM
  #68  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (5)
 
mchicia1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ed Curtis

That's castings and valves for roughly $2400 a pair. You have to add in the spring package and rocker stands to get a total price. Of course, valve spring choice can add a little (or a lot) to that end price.


True, but the same can be said about the BSPs. I guess in the end, I paid $1650 assembled with rocker stands.

Still pretty cheap for new heads.

Maybe I'll sell mine later and try these out just because.
Old 01-13-2014, 09:46 AM
  #69  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mchicia1
True, but the same can be said about the BSPs. I guess in the end, I paid $1650 assembled with rocker stands.

Still pretty cheap for new heads.

Maybe I'll sell mine later and try these out just because.
I'd be curious to know what the HP/TQ difference is between the BSP and MAST heads. Anyone care to take a guess?
Old 01-13-2014, 09:56 AM
  #70  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (5)
 
mchicia1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Rise of the Phoenix
I'd be curious to know what the HP/TQ difference is between the BSP and MAST heads. Anyone care to take a guess?
The masts are 62CC chambers and are 240cc intake volume vs the BSP 70cc/255cc respectively.

With the same cam, I would guess the mast would peak a bit higher, but it would probably have a much broader powerband from the smaller intake runner and higher compression.
Old 01-13-2014, 10:03 AM
  #71  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mchicia1
The masts are 62CC chambers and are 240cc intake volume vs the BSP 70cc/255cc respectively.

With the same cam, I would guess the mast would peak a bit higher, but it would probably have a much broader powerband from the smaller intake runner and higher compression.
True, but you could always mill the BSP heads and raise compression. Flycutting would be a requirement, but I bet it would make an *** load of difference.
Old 01-13-2014, 10:25 AM
  #72  
The Scammer Hammer
Thread Starter
iTrader: (49)
 
dr_whigham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 6,708
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

Something I've been curious about, and this may sound far fetched... How hard would it be to either epoxy or weld the intake runners to make them say a 230cc or so?

Surely that would bring the powerband down in the RPM range and maintain a bit better velocity for sub-4k torque.

It's just an idea. Even Mast said they're more "optimized" for a stroker, but work fine on a 346; They just don't begin to really "shine" till after 4500.

I'm thinking this is where cam selection and valve events come into play, which Ed could shine more light on.
Old 01-13-2014, 11:12 AM
  #73  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

I'm sure the right cam can take care of that below 4k issue. I guess I just don't really care a whole lot anymore about power below 4k, which is why I wish I'd have gone a lot bigger on the cam than what I have now. A new cam will be in order anyway once I switch over to the Super Victor/4150 TB.
Old 01-13-2014, 11:34 AM
  #74  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (5)
 
mchicia1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Rise of the Phoenix
True, but you could always mill the BSP heads and raise compression. Flycutting would be a requirement, but I bet it would make an *** load of difference.
Mine are milled .030" with .040" cometics. I'm still only at like 10.1:1 since I have -3.2cc pistons and I believe Wiseco are zero deck pistons.
Old 01-13-2014, 11:37 AM
  #75  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (5)
 
mchicia1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Rise of the Phoenix
I'm sure the right cam can take care of that below 4k issue. I guess I just don't really care a whole lot anymore about power below 4k, which is why I wish I'd have gone a lot bigger on the cam than what I have now. A new cam will be in order anyway once I switch over to the Super Victor/4150 TB.
My cam has an IVC of 37.5 and it's still a little lazy below 4k. There's nothing you can do about it with these heads on a 347.

I don't care though.

If you can find a way to get 11:1 with these heads, it will help a ton.

Everyone has a different definition of lazy though. When I say lazy, I mean it doesn't snap ahead..it still goes fine. Even my AI 226 + 226/230 cam setup was lazy below 3500. They're 347s, they're gonna be a bit lazy down low.
Old 01-14-2014, 03:58 PM
  #76  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (5)
 
mchicia1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

They're $2600 fully assembled right on their website. Although, I thought I saw somewhere they were 240cc. They are 253 it appears, basically stock ls3.

Apparently, they don't think a 2.08" intake valve is too big either

http://www.mastmotorsports.com/2010/...sembled&id=360
Old 01-15-2014, 07:55 PM
  #77  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
red fury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Arnaudville, LA
Posts: 836
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by dr_whigham
Even Mast said they're more "optimized" for a stroker, but work fine on a 346; They just don't begin to really "shine" till after 4500.
Why not consider the Mast 215 cc's? We all know the car with the better HP and TQ avg wins the race. Instead of having on and off power...
Old 01-16-2014, 03:57 AM
  #78  
Staging Lane
 
SIG-054's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Rise of the Phoenix
True, but you could always mill the BSP heads and raise compression. Flycutting would be a requirement, but I bet it would make an *** load of difference.
Mill the MAST's and still won't have to flycut pistons. I'm at 11.8scr with a large cam with clearance. The benefit of an 11degree head.

I'm running REV stainless valves, had the spring bases machined out for k motion k800 valve springs.

These heads can also accept larger pushrods, can the bsp's do that? (Not being smart, just a Q )
Old 01-16-2014, 08:20 AM
  #79  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (5)
 
mchicia1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Yes, I am running 3/8" pushrods in mine. Factory LS3 heads can take 3/8", that's all the BSPs are is a factory head with a special valve modification that allows it to fit in a small bore 3.898".

I'd love to try the masts out.
Old 01-26-2014, 03:30 AM
  #80  
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Titokang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: texas
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Sig, you have a part number for the valves? What pushrod length/diameter are you running.



Quick Reply: Mast LS3 Small Bore Heads



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:23 PM.