H/C install - 228R/241s
02-19-2014, 10:09 AM
#42
Teching In
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: LAS VEGAS
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Congrats Tyler! What strong numbers 450 HP. 433 TQ. The car was tuned on Zippy Performance dyno. The Heads were not flow tested as I only charged $300.00. I have been porting heads in Las Vegas for 25yrs. and have flow tested my work in the past. 296 cfm at .650 lift. I wonder what it would do with a Fast intake, Underdrive pulley and electric water pump?
02-19-2014, 02:33 PM
#43
What strong numbers 450 HP. 433 TQ. The car was tuned on Zippy Performance dyno. The Heads were not flow tested as I only charged $300.00. I have been porting heads in Las Vegas for 25yrs. and have flow tested my work in the past. 296 cfm at .650 lift. I wonder what it would do with a Fast intake, Underdrive pulley and electric water pump?
02-20-2014, 10:07 AM
#46
Teching In
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: LAS VEGAS
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The top 10 list on Zippy's Dyno have all backed up there numbers with track times. Highest is 1250 HP that ran 7.80 173mph. I did expect someone to call out the dyno used. Tyler will post his MPH.
02-20-2014, 12:53 PM
#48
11 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Those are nice numbers. I'm not calling anyone a liar, but the results are out of the ordinary a bit. Track times are more important so when he runs the car that'll be a better bench mark. Throw so Mt's on there and see what she's got!
02-28-2014, 07:45 PM
#53
Teching In
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: LAS VEGAS
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Head Flow I have flow tested, The worst case was 286cfm @ .650 and best was 296 cfm. Again for $300.00. You can get 300+ cfm out of factory castings with more time and money. The question is how much runner volume and flow do you need for a 346" 11.2 comp. street engine. AFR 205 head and a 224 228 114 cam is the best street combination I have seen at 485rwhp If I remember correct.
03-17-2014, 08:08 PM
#55
On The Tree
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The keyword in this quote is the reason for the inflated dyno numbers......SAE correction factor should bring it down to the 415-420whp/395-400wtq area.
Nice set-up though, I'm sure it is well mannered and has plenty of torque.
03-18-2014, 01:08 AM
#56
On The Tree
Thread Starter
I did..first time in about a year so there's a little room for improvement. Left one was the first pass and the right was the 2nd. On the second pass my foot cramped up really bad so I smashed the pedal and spun. The track is never prepped and it's over 2k alt so that doesn't help but whatever 
03-18-2014, 06:05 AM
#57
I don't think there's too much anyone can say at this point. You did the research, chose the products, installed them and then put them to the test. No matter if the results are enough to please everyone, I say job well done.
Once you get more comfortable with the car in that setting, the times will come down some, especially that reaction time. You could measure that with a calendar! J/K Great job and a great thread to follow.
Once you get more comfortable with the car in that setting, the times will come down some, especially that reaction time. You could measure that with a calendar! J/K Great job and a great thread to follow.
03-18-2014, 12:57 PM
#58
Staging Lane
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't think there's too much anyone can say at this point. You did the research, chose the products, installed them and then put them to the test. No matter if the results are enough to please everyone, I say job well done.
Once you get more comfortable with the car in that setting, the times will come down some, especially that reaction time. You could measure that with a calendar! J/K Great job and a great thread to follow.
Once you get more comfortable with the car in that setting, the times will come down some, especially that reaction time. You could measure that with a calendar! J/K Great job and a great thread to follow.
OP has some work to do on his ET's with those 60' times but 114mph in an f-body at 3500'+DA is pretty fast. Its right at 119-120mph at sea level. I'd say the car is running good for such a mild set-up.
