Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Help with Cam package selection

Old May 19, 2004 | 11:06 AM
  #1  
VaderWS6's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: USA
Thumbs up Help with Cam package selection

I was comparing cam package prices with Texas Speed & Performance, and Thunder Racing. Texas Speed's prices are a lot cheaper, and seem to come with better parts.

Pack 1.Your choice of TSP custom-grind camshaft, Comp Cams 26918-16 valve springs good to .600" lift, Texas Speed & Performance hardened pushrods $559.99


Pack 2.Your choice of TSP camshaft, Manley valve springs good to .600" lift, Manley titanium retainers, Texas Speed & Performance hardened pushrods $599.99


Pack 3.Your choice of TSP camshaft, Manley valve springs good to .600" lift, Manley titanium retainers, Texas Speed & Performance hardened pushrods $659.99


Pack 4.Texas Speed TSP Camshaft, Crane Double Valve Springs, Titanium Retainers, Hardened Spring Seats, GM Valve Seals, Texas Speed & Performance Hardened Pushrods $669.99

The TSP cam that I was looking at has the following specs: TSP Custom 224 Cam: 224/224, .566"/.566", 112 LSA

Description: 1700-6500 RPM Power Band; This cam has great mid-range and top-end power with less lift and less aggressive lobes than the 224R. Custom tuning required on automatic cars.


The Thunder Racing cam package is as follows:

Thunder Racing LS1 Cam Swap Package Includes:
- Your Choice of Thunder Racing Custom Grind Camshaft
- Comp Cams 26918 Valve Springs
- Comp Cams 772 Titanium Retainers ($100 Additional)
- Thunder Racing Stock Length Pushrods (7.400)
- Cam Swap Gasket Kit (Specify Year of Car) $699.99

The TR cam I was thinking about getting has the following specs: 224/224 .563/.563 112 LSA


Would there be any difference between these cams?

TSP: 224/224, .566"/.566", 112 LSA
TR:224/224 .563/.563 112 LSA

What do you guys think?
Reply
Old May 19, 2004 | 11:09 AM
  #2  
99WS6LS1T/A's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere in Cajun Country
Default

Originally Posted by VaderWS6
I was comparing cam package prices with Texas Speed & Performance, and Thunder Racing. Texas Speed's prices are a lot cheaper, and seem to come with better parts.

Pack 1.Your choice of TSP custom-grind camshaft, Comp Cams 26918-16 valve springs good to .600" lift, Texas Speed & Performance hardened pushrods $559.99


Pack 2.Your choice of TSP camshaft, Manley valve springs good to .600" lift, Manley titanium retainers, Texas Speed & Performance hardened pushrods $599.99


Pack 3.Your choice of TSP camshaft, Manley valve springs good to .600" lift, Manley titanium retainers, Texas Speed & Performance hardened pushrods $659.99


Pack 4.Texas Speed TSP Camshaft, Crane Double Valve Springs, Titanium Retainers, Hardened Spring Seats, GM Valve Seals, Texas Speed & Performance Hardened Pushrods $669.99

The TSP cam that I was looking at has the following specs: TSP Custom 224 Cam: 224/224, .566"/.566", 112 LSA

Description: 1700-6500 RPM Power Band; This cam has great mid-range and top-end power with less lift and less aggressive lobes than the 224R. Custom tuning required on automatic cars.


The Thunder Racing cam package is as follows:

Thunder Racing LS1 Cam Swap Package Includes:
- Your Choice of Thunder Racing Custom Grind Camshaft
- Comp Cams 26918 Valve Springs
- Comp Cams 772 Titanium Retainers ($100 Additional)
- Thunder Racing Stock Length Pushrods (7.400)
- Cam Swap Gasket Kit (Specify Year of Car) $699.99

The TR cam I was thinking about getting has the following specs: 224/224 .563/.563 112 LSA


Would there be any difference between these cams?

TSP: 224/224, .566"/.566", 112 LSA
TR:224/224 .563/.563 112 LSA

What do you guys think?
Go with the TR224 it's an awesome producing cam across the board. Also the driveability is awesome.
Reply
Old May 19, 2004 | 11:22 AM
  #3  
SouthFL.02.SS's Avatar
!LS1 11 Second Club
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 7,133
Likes: 2
From: Miami
Default

Check out TSP's new 225 cam.
Reply
Old May 19, 2004 | 11:27 AM
  #4  
1fastWS6's Avatar
8 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 1
From: Missouri
Default

The TR224 has more agressive lobes than the TSP 224 cam which will make slightly more torque and have better street manners. The TSP 225 cam probably has a similar lobe to the TR224.

I'd highly recommend the TR224 cam, although I've seen some good results with the new TSP 225 cam too.
Reply
Old May 19, 2004 | 12:01 PM
  #5  
mrr23's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,266
Likes: 0
From: orlando, fl
Default

might want to look at VHP cams also. http://www.vincihighperformance.com/superwebdeals.HTML
Reply
Old May 19, 2004 | 12:15 PM
  #6  
BeachZ's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Default

I just got my TR224 in, and it's awesome. It took some getting used to, though-- the car wouldn't idle worth crap until I got it tuned (A4) and there's also a definite lope to the cam. The torque throughout the powerband is pretty amazing.
Reply
Old May 19, 2004 | 12:48 PM
  #7  
Ryan02SS's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,795
Likes: 0
From: Lake Anna, VA/ Fairmont, WV
Default

Thunder has a nice complete package. I went that route with my setup. Their cam package is complete and they also throw in the new crank bolt. TR224 all the way.



Damn Imagestation Crap! Sometimes the pics show and sometimes they don't.

Last edited by Ryan02SS; May 19, 2004 at 01:57 PM.
Reply
Old May 19, 2004 | 01:16 PM
  #8  
busavette's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Default

I got the 224/581/115 from TSP waitin to go in,waitin for a few more parts(manifold.),you can upgrade(springs,locks) a little more with TSP as well at a good price.
Reply
Old May 20, 2004 | 08:43 PM
  #9  
lsx24's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (45)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,556
Likes: 0
From: NC
Default

TR224 is a proven performer, although I still am skeptical of it's low end tq compared to stock cam without having driven it.
Reply
Old May 20, 2004 | 10:00 PM
  #10  
jrp's Avatar
jrp
SN95 Director
20 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,755
Likes: 7
From: Valencia, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by Carvinta
TR224 is a proven performer, although I still am skeptical of it's low end tq compared to stock cam without having driven it.
i've yet to see any cam, any size not make more low end tq compared to the stock cam.
Reply
Old May 20, 2004 | 10:09 PM
  #11  
1fastWS6's Avatar
8 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 1
From: Missouri
Default

I gained torque throughout the entire powerband.....
Reply
Old May 20, 2004 | 11:20 PM
  #12  
lsx24's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (45)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,556
Likes: 0
From: NC
Default

Originally Posted by jrp
i've yet to see any cam, any size not make more low end tq compared to the stock cam.
Well, maybe I'm biased from being an A4, but by low end I mean 1.6-3.5k rpm. I know I might get unusual looks from that, but something that I can still put on the stock converter and not feel like a dog. If indeed the Tr224 has more 'low end', I could temporarily run it with the stock converter and still feel like the car is fine or better at all non-racing speeds. The question is not why, but am I off base here?
Reply
Old May 20, 2004 | 11:22 PM
  #13  
SouthFL.02.SS's Avatar
!LS1 11 Second Club
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 7,133
Likes: 2
From: Miami
Default

'Verter first, then cam. That's the way it should go. Even better, match the two.
Reply
Old May 21, 2004 | 07:40 AM
  #14  
Ryan02SS's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,795
Likes: 0
From: Lake Anna, VA/ Fairmont, WV
Default

My stock headed TR224 made 300rwtq at 2500rpms with an open QTEC and 345rwtq at 3000rpms and 360rwtq at 3500rpms. This is much better than my stock cam by far. As far as lowend under 2500rpms I have no numbers to give you but I can tell no loss of power over the stock cam. I can accelerate up these steep *** WV hills in 6th gear at 1700rpms fine just like I could with the stock cam.
Reply
Old May 22, 2004 | 03:50 PM
  #15  
foff667's Avatar
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 7,986
Likes: 3
From: Clermont, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Carvinta
Well, maybe I'm biased from being an A4, but by low end I mean 1.6-3.5k rpm. I know I might get unusual looks from that, but something that I can still put on the stock converter and not feel like a dog. If indeed the Tr224 has more 'low end', I could temporarily run it with the stock converter and still feel like the car is fine or better at all non-racing speeds. The question is not why, but am I off base here?
you'll pick up tons more time doing a converter first if you want the sound of a cam just pull a plug wire or two off.
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:57 PM.