Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Rod bolts

Old Jan 2, 2016 | 06:20 AM
  #41  
BaddBird's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
From: Mo
Default

Originally Posted by Taxman20
Yea this is exactly why trying to say anything in text. sometimes doesn't work. Things are taken out of context.

I NEVER said I was using a certain torque to avoid distortion. I DID say that I was going to try and torque the ARP bolt the same total amount of torque as the stock bolt. I agreed that torqueing a stronger bolt could result un a higher ending torque if using the angle method due to lack of bolt stretch. Hense a little lower torque than the stock bolt end result.

As for trolling, nope. The way I am setting my rods and bolts are not unlike Matt sets his. Using torque. I am going to do some tests and see what kind of poundage different ways end up though. So whats the issue?

You guys are killing me with reading what you like into my words.

Ill try to make this simple.
Use stock bolt. Torque using angle method.
Check final lbs of torque on that stock bolt
Install ARP bolts to that poundage.
Is it really that hard?

I understand the conversation of "holding" and Grip on the rod by the bolt. I am not worried about that when using the ARP.

I cant make it any more simple.
You do know that the amount of final ft-lbs is going to be different from one stock rod bolt to the next using the angle method. So how will you be making the choice of what amount of torque to use?

Use stock bolt. Torque using angle method.
Check final lbs of torque on that stock bolt Install ARP bolts to that poundage.
Is it really that hard?
If it was that simple why would gm not supply the final ft-lbs spec and be done with it?
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2016 | 08:44 AM
  #42  
Taxman20's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 976
Likes: 1
From: San Marcos, Tx
Default

By taking the average.

I understand completely how and why GM does it the way they do. But it doesn't work with ARP type bolts. Final torque would be too high.

Guys, what I am doing is a test, that's it. We will see how it works out. It will go or it will blow. Either way its not a huge loss.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2016 | 10:14 AM
  #43  
Jakinoutcreekst's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Default

Well i want to use ls6 bolts and my entire question was if there is anything wrong with using that bolt if the motor will never see 6200rpms
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2016 | 10:40 AM
  #44  
Matt Burns's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Jakinoutcreekst
Well i want to use ls6 bolts and my entire question was if there is anything wrong with using that bolt if the motor will never see 6200rpms
I wouldn't hesitate to run a stock bolt to 6200.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2016 | 10:42 AM
  #45  
BaddBird's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
From: Mo
Default

Originally Posted by Jakinoutcreekst
Well i want to use ls6 bolts and my entire question was if there is anything wrong with using that bolt if the motor will never see 6200rpms
You will be fine.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2016 | 07:30 PM
  #46  
Taxman20's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 976
Likes: 1
From: San Marcos, Tx
Default

Agreed. That's not a lot of rpm for a stock bolt. High 6-7k and I would start to worry.
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:21 PM.