Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: Which cam do you think is the best match for my goals?
Cam motion: 232/240 .621/.604 114+3
16.67%
Advanced induction: 234/240-113 .626"
0
0%
Advanced induction: 230/238-113 .605”
12.50%
Tick SNS 3 Milder Lobes: 234/242 .612"/.615" LSA111+2
54.17%
Other: Please post and provide recommendation
16.67%
Voters: 24. You may not vote on this poll

Final cam decision - vendor recommendations included - input needed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-07-2016, 02:45 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
RollinSScamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Frankenmuth, MI
Posts: 1,164
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default Final cam decision - vendor recommendations included - input needed

I have heard back from most of the vendors on what they recommend for my goals. This is what I said my goals were and I'll list what was recommended by different vendors.

Decent/ Good Driveability( i understand it wont be stock) with no PTV issues, 450 rwhp(not just a dyno queen) with good mid range torque, don't want to have to rev it to 4000 before I feel any power, something that will match well with 3.73 (for when my 10 bolt let's loose in the future) and I'd like it to pull hard to 65-6800 but not much higher due to being on a stock bottom end. It is not driven daily but would love to be able to make a 100 mile trip and feel confident. I expect some low rpm bucking but don't want it to be too bad. I plan on going with advanced inductions 226cc 243 heads for sure since i think they are hard to beat. If I can achieve near my goals with a stock LS6 intake then great, if not I'll see if budget will allow for a FAST 92/92. Im not going to be disappointed if i hit 410-420 as long as it performs at the track.. 450rwhp is just what im shooting for..Rest of supporting mods in my signature.

Here is what was recommended. The catch is, I have the SNS 3 mild but started second guessing and looking for different specs. TICK recommended I keep that cam for my goals so I'll include that spec with the rest. They are are real close. I was expecting much different recommendations honestly..

-Tick SNS 3 Milder Lobes: 234/242 | .612"/.615" | LSA111+2 recommended to mil my 243s to .010 to get around 10.5 to 1. I bought this cam used and on a COMP core made in 2015 (the whine issue was in 2014)

-Cam motion: 232/240 .621/.604 114+3 mill to .025 for 60cc at around 10.8:1

-Advanced induction: 234/240-113 .626 mill heads to achieve 10.7-10.8 to 1
Or to get to 11:1 go with a 230/238-113 .605”

As you can see, a lot of close recommendations based on my goals. I don't want this to be a favorite vendor battle because all choices have great customer service and have helped me a lot to determine what I need.

Do I keep the SNS 3 mild or sell it to get one of the other 3? How much difference will I really see between the 4 listed? Seems like it would be minimal but I'm not a pro, so any input would be greatly appreciated.
Old 10-07-2016, 03:05 PM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
whatsa347's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: clear lake, Texas
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I went with the streetsweeper HT, I don't think I've ever read anything negative about it, still haven't installed it but it's hit 450 RWHP plenty of times with a decent set of heads. I essentially have the same heads as you (TEA stage 1 243's) so it should do fairly well. It's ground on a comp core but Ed is a great guy to deal with and assured me he has had no issues and would take care of them if any were to arise, it's worth a shout out for another option.
Old 10-07-2016, 03:18 PM
  #3  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
thunderstruck507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest AR
Posts: 8,357
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

I ran a Cam Motion very similar to that one. Mine was 230/238 .620"/.602" 113+3

It worked very well for a combo like what you want. I would def recommend that.

To be quite frank I don't care what year the Comp grind was dated I wouldn't install it in anything I owned. Aside from the "whine" issue a lot of them had issue with surface flaking/pitting as well. Supposedly they have recently fixed this but I no longer have faith in their product so I steer clear.
Old 10-07-2016, 05:51 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
RollinSScamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Frankenmuth, MI
Posts: 1,164
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by thunderstruck507
I ran a Cam Motion very similar to that one. Mine was 230/238 .620"/.602" 113+3

It worked very well for a combo like what you want. I would def recommend that.

To be quite frank I don't care what year the Comp grind was dated I wouldn't install it in anything I owned. Aside from the "whine" issue a lot of them had issue with surface flaking/pitting as well. Supposedly they have recently fixed this but I no longer have faith in their product so I steer clear.
I know that cam motion spec looked real good and could bump compression more. I know comp had that issue but you would think with as many of their cams are out there that it would be OK.. I'll have to Google the pitting issues and see what I come up with. I wonder if that was an issue at the same time as the whining? Thanks for the info
Old 10-07-2016, 06:01 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
RollinSScamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Frankenmuth, MI
Posts: 1,164
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Also added a poll to help get more input from others that don't feel like posting. Keep in mind, please focus more on the spec itself, I don't want to turn it into who the favorite is.. I'm sure Martin/BTR/etc. could also be in the running. Sent a message to Martin and haven't recieved a reply yet, but I'd venture to guess the spec would be sinilar.

Thanks again for any input!
Old 10-07-2016, 08:03 PM
  #6  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (57)
 
ragtopz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ft. Myers, FL
Posts: 2,014
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

I would add BTR Stage 3 and Stage 4 to your list.
I have the stage 3 w/very similar bolt-on's as you (lesser heads and converter) and full weight.
Mine runs 11.5 @ 118 on motor
Old 10-07-2016, 08:15 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
RollinSScamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Frankenmuth, MI
Posts: 1,164
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ragtopz28
I would add BTR Stage 3 and Stage 4 to your list.
I have the stage 3 w/very similar bolt-on's as you (lesser heads and converter) and full weight.
Mine runs 11.5 @ 118 on motor
Lol I had a feeling those would be recommended at some point.. I havent gotten with BTR yet to spec but if I do I'll add it to the list.. thanks for sharing your results.. very impressive! Any dyno results to pair with it?
Old 10-07-2016, 08:38 PM
  #8  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (57)
 
ragtopz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ft. Myers, FL
Posts: 2,014
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RollinSScamaro
Lol I had a feeling those would be recommended at some point.. I havent gotten with BTR yet to spec but if I do I'll add it to the list.. thanks for sharing your results.. very impressive! Any dyno results to pair with it?
Like you know, dyno numbers are just that, numbers. It made 402 unlocked and (just for fun, one time) 420 locked. SS3600 and 3.42 geared 10 bolt. Now have a spooled S60 w/no dyno #'s but the 60' dropped to 1.46 full weight+(150 shot)

Last edited by ragtopz28; 10-07-2016 at 08:47 PM.
Old 10-07-2016, 08:48 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
RollinSScamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Frankenmuth, MI
Posts: 1,164
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ragtopz28
Like you know, dyno numbers are just that, numbers. It made 402 unlocked and (just for fun, one time) 420 locked. SS3600 and 3.42 geared 10 bolt. Now have a spooled S60 w/no dyno #'s but the 60' dropped to 1.46 full weight+
For sure! It performs and that's what's important but 420 is still damn good! Is that with ported or stock heads? I can't imagine a 1.46 60 ft, I've only pulled a 1.6 in the past.. that's gotta be fun! Lol
Old 10-07-2016, 08:54 PM
  #10  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (57)
 
ragtopz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ft. Myers, FL
Posts: 2,014
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RollinSScamaro
For sure! It performs and that's what's important but 420 is still damn good! Is that with ported or stock heads? I can't imagine a 1.46 60 ft, I've only pulled a 1.6 in the past.. that's gotta be fun! Lol
Light port on 241's and milled .015 (the Stage 4 will not fit P/V with any milling at all, hence the Stage 3). 1.6 is all mine will do on motor.
Old 10-07-2016, 09:11 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
RollinSScamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Frankenmuth, MI
Posts: 1,164
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Wow 420 with ported 241s.. very good numbers and times.. good info and nice set up, I'll definitely consider the BTR 3.. the specs look closely in line with the others I've listed
Old 10-07-2016, 09:30 PM
  #12  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (57)
 
ragtopz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ft. Myers, FL
Posts: 2,014
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RollinSScamaro
Wow 420 with ported 241s.. very good numbers and times.. good info and nice set up, I'll definitely consider the BTR 3.. the specs look closely in line with the others I've listed
Yes, very similar to the SNS 3....give Brian a call, he will let you know if the Stage 4 (recommended) will "fit". Oh, and I run a LS6 intake and Shaner 3 TB
Old 10-07-2016, 10:41 PM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
pozesd99''s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Why not go with a aftermarket casting head to allow more milking and compression without ptv clearance issues
Old 10-08-2016, 01:06 AM
  #14  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
TXZ28LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Classified
Posts: 6,164
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Im running Livernois Motorsports stage 3 LS6 heads and TSP 233/239 cam. No issues at all. It is about as aggressive as i would go. My goals are exactly the same as yours OP.

Honestly, with the cams that your looking at, i doubt you will notice a difference between them.
Old 10-08-2016, 03:17 AM
  #15  
Launching!
 
WS6RED2002TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hinesville, GA
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I had a M6 2002 WS6 that made 450rwhp and 426rwtq. That was with TFS 215 milled to 61cc and a small 224/228 112+4. I loved that set up and hurt a lot of feelings.lol With the right combo and supporting mods you should be able to hit your goal very easily. Good luck and keep us posted.
Old 10-08-2016, 07:36 AM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
RollinSScamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Frankenmuth, MI
Posts: 1,164
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by pozesd99'
Why not go with a aftermarket casting head to allow more milking and compression without ptv clearance issues
Just trying to keep it within a budget, I wish I could do aftermarket heads, but by the time I'm done with my 243s I'll have roughly $1300-1400 into them and they will flow extremely well.

TXZ28 LS1 that set up isn't too far from what I'm looking for. I'm was kind of thinking the same on the cams, how much different would they really be.. I'm wondering if the lower LSA would help me keep more mid range torque vs. Top end. I've always heard a 114 lsa is better for autos but not sure why, other than that the durations are pretty close on all of them.

WS6RED2002TA that's crazy you were able to achieve that with such a small cam.. good supporting mods and good heads would help I guess. What did it put down at the track?
Old 10-08-2016, 08:57 AM
  #17  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (9)
 
blk99camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 548
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Stick with the SNS3, and mill the heads...you ALREADY have the cam and its fairly close to other recommendations....if my car was not my DD, I would have gone with the SNS3 vice the SNS2, BUT I opted for the LS2 version to be more in between the two and keep essentially the same powerband.
Old 10-08-2016, 09:25 AM
  #18  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 5,794
Received 196 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

my opinion(and I think I mentioned this in another thread) would be to back the cam down into the 228/232 range. Everyone's perspective on what they consider "good drive-ability" is different, but I would not want a cam with 234 intake duration for a 346 that is driven frequently.

Aside from that, the Titan 4(228/232), AI 243's milled for 11.4:1, Fast 92, and 1 7/8 header setup should easily make 450whp and run high 10's to low 11's. It's been done many times. You do not need a big cam to do reach your goals with your current parts list. This setup will drive better and have more throttle response due to the compression bump. Also the compression difference will off set the power difference between the 228/232 and the larger cams with less compression.

If you want to run a larger cam, then I would either fly cut, or go with aftermarket castings that allow for more compression due to increased PTV.
Old 10-08-2016, 09:29 AM
  #19  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
RollinSScamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Frankenmuth, MI
Posts: 1,164
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by blk99camaro
Stick with the SNS3, and mill the heads...you ALREADY have the cam and its fairly close to other recommendations....if my car was not my DD, I would have gone with the SNS3 vice the SNS2, BUT I opted for the LS2 version to be more in between the two and keep essentially the same powerband.

That's the predicament I've been stuck with since I already have it.. I know it will be a beast too..I think all of the recent hate towards comp makes me hesitate a little more but I'm sure it's fine. I appreciate the input
Old 10-08-2016, 09:57 AM
  #20  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
RollinSScamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Frankenmuth, MI
Posts: 1,164
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by kinglt-1
my opinion(and I think I mentioned this in another thread) would be to back the cam down into the 228/232 range. Everyone's perspective on what they consider "good drive-ability" is different, but I would not want a cam with 234 intake duration for a 346 that is driven frequently.

Aside from that, the Titan 4(228/232), AI 243's milled for 11.4:1, Fast 92, and 1 7/8 header setup should easily make 450whp and run high 10's to low 11's. It's been done many times. You do not need a big cam to do reach your goals with your current parts list. This setup will drive better and have more throttle response due to the compression bump. Also the compression difference will off set the power difference between the 228/232 and the larger cams with less compression.

If you want to run a larger cam, then I would either fly cut, or go with aftermarket castings that allow for more compression due to increased PTV.
I know you mentioned this and it makes sense to me to raise the compression to make up the difference of a smaller cam. I am just curious why I keep getting all of my specs back over 230.. is it just due to my goal of 450 rwhp? I wonder if that's pushing them to go higher to squeeze every bit out of it? I will definitely keep you recommendation in the running.. I've heard a ton of people doing very well with the Titan cams


Quick Reply: Final cam decision - vendor recommendations included - input needed



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:55 AM.