Recommended this cam...
07-03-2004 | 03:00 PM
#41
TECH Resident
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 803
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, North Carolina
Originally Posted by Carvinta
Lots of good info here about the Comp stuff, I decided to purchase the 216/220 114 for the following reasons, in the following order:
1). low lift and moderate (relatively as per Comp tech) ramps, EXCELLENT for spring life. With quality duals on board, I would estimate time to replace would rival OEM
2). great gains from area under the curve, good low end tq cam. However doesn't run out of steam up top, not a peak cam by any means
3). peaks ~ 6k RPM +-
4). TC not required
5). pretty stealthy idle if initial set right and tuned
6). power potential of much bigger cams (as stated earlier) i.e., 400+ rwhp
If you can find another cam that satisfies all of these requirements, I would be surprised. Luck Good!
1). low lift and moderate (relatively as per Comp tech) ramps, EXCELLENT for spring life. With quality duals on board, I would estimate time to replace would rival OEM
2). great gains from area under the curve, good low end tq cam. However doesn't run out of steam up top, not a peak cam by any means
3). peaks ~ 6k RPM +-
4). TC not required
5). pretty stealthy idle if initial set right and tuned
6). power potential of much bigger cams (as stated earlier) i.e., 400+ rwhp
If you can find another cam that satisfies all of these requirements, I would be surprised. Luck Good!
07-03-2004 | 09:24 PM
#43
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by kp
The 216/220 is a decent cam but for some odd reason its fairly noisy valvetrain-wise, I replaced it with a 222/224 112 XE comp and picked up 13rwhp peak and a couple ft/lbs torque but it was a lot quieter for some odd reason, same springs.
From what I understand noisy valvetrains result from new cams possessing smaller base circle diameters than the cam being replaced, and as a result, preload not being what it should be, due to improper pushrod length. The manufacturer for a small cam I was considering for my truck (205/211) said that the base circle diameter was so much smaller than my stock cam, that I would need 7.45" pushrods to compensate for this, and avoid the 'sewing machine' or excess valvetrain noise.
07-03-2004 | 10:00 PM
#44
Thunder Racing cams ground by Lunati? I really don't know. My TR cam came with COMP decals and it was idebtified as a COMP cam. I assumed they were purchased by TR and then custom ground in-house. Does anyone know if TR does the grinds or if Lunati, if fact, actually does TR's custom grinds??
