Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Head decision for 5.3 NA build.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 10, 2018 | 09:45 PM
  #21  
G Atsma's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 22,288
Likes: 3,615
From: Central Cal.
Default

Naw, man, it's good to put all options out there. He seems to have a clear vision of what he wants. What I caught was the "budget" part of the build, so I kinda focused on that.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2018 | 09:48 PM
  #22  
76firechicken's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by G Atsma
Naw, man, it's good to put all options out there. He seems to have a clear vision of what he wants. What I caught was the "budget" part of the build, so I kinda focused on that.
it is and isn't a budget build.

I'm frugal, I like to have a purpose and make every dollar work for me.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2018 | 09:57 PM
  #23  
G Atsma's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 22,288
Likes: 3,615
From: Central Cal.
Default

Originally Posted by 76firechicken
it is and isn't a budget build.

I'm frugal, I like to have a purpose and make every dollar work for me.
TOTALLY get that! I always like to get the most work out of my dollars!
Your plan for a good-running 5.3 seems on a good path. Have a good one. man!
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2018 | 10:21 PM
  #24  
76firechicken's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Default

While I'm at it? Can anyone recommend a complete standard bore rotating assembly? Better off piecing together? Having a hard time with finding standard bore pistons but don't want to pay for machining that isn't necessary.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2018 | 11:34 PM
  #25  
G Atsma's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 22,288
Likes: 3,615
From: Central Cal.
Default

Originally Posted by 76firechicken
While I'm at it? Can anyone recommend a complete standard bore rotating assembly? Better off piecing together? Having a hard time with finding standard bore pistons but don't want to pay for machining that isn't necessary.
Get ahold of WS6store, a sponsor/vendor on this site. They are VERY helpful and if they don't have what you need they will know who does. They have good prices, great service, and honest advice.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2018 | 06:50 AM
  #26  
cookseyb's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 926
Likes: 18
From: Central Texas
Default

You could also look at sending those 862's to Texas Speed for rework and get their recommendation on cam and rotating assembly's, they grind their own cams and cranks etc. Nice folks too
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2018 | 07:40 AM
  #27  
DMarts10's Avatar
On The Tree
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 163
Likes: 19
From: MA
Default

How much are you willing to spend on this build? And are you against n2o and forced induction? The reason I ask is, that you could likely exceed your power goals using N2o or forced induction for little more or the same cost as building a 4-500 rwhp forged, aftermarket headed, cammed, reliable 5.3. Why not procharge or turbo the sbe, cam it, throw some pac 1218 springs on the top end, and make 500+ rwhp
On 8psi? Also, a cammed springed engine with a 150 shot will make your goals for a couple grand. All depends what you’re looking to do.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2018 | 08:31 AM
  #28  
76firechicken's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DMarts10
How much are you willing to spend on this build? And are you against n2o and forced induction? The reason I ask is, that you could likely exceed your power goals using N2o or forced induction for little more or the same cost as building a 4-500 rwhp forged, aftermarket headed, cammed, reliable 5.3. Why not procharge or turbo the sbe, cam it, throw some pac 1218 springs on the top end, and make 500+ rwhp
On 8psi? Also, a cammed springed engine with a 150 shot will make your goals for a couple grand. All depends what you’re looking to do.
I'm not opposed to boost, I know what these engines are capable of. My main reasoning for staying n/a is the ability to run a single plane intake and run a factory style shaker.

If down the road, I decide I want to go faster, I'll get a blower and redo things. A cam only 5.3 will make about 3x the power that the original 400 made so we're already seeing a major improvement.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2018 | 08:43 AM
  #29  
ddnspider's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,628
Likes: 1,778
From: FL
Default

An ls9 cam on an na 5.3 will be a dog unless reving to 7k min. Think long term and pick around those goals. Triple 12 cam now and plan for boost and leave the heads alone.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2018 | 05:47 PM
  #30  
oldfogey47's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
From: Elbert, Colorado
Default

regarding the: "Clean up the heads with a little port job" statement...

WHO would you recommend for a "little port job"? I've got a nice pair of 853's that could use this.

Thanks...
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2018 | 05:54 PM
  #31  
cam's Avatar
cam
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,389
Likes: 67
From: in the garage
Default

heres a good start

https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...ng-sticky.html
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2018 | 07:18 PM
  #32  
Darth_V8r's Avatar
Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 10,451
Likes: 1,872
From: My own internal universe
Default

Originally Posted by oldfogey47
regarding the: "Clean up the heads with a little port job" statement...

WHO would you recommend for a "little port job"? I've got a nice pair of 853's that could use this.

Thanks...
Not sure who you are asking. A few made this suggestion. I would personally use AI for something like this.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2018 | 08:10 PM
  #33  
A.R. Shale Targa's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,729
Likes: 15
From: Fredonia,WI
Default

Originally Posted by oldfogey47
regarding the: "Clean up the heads with a little port job" statement...

WHO would you recommend for a "little port job"? I've got a nice pair of 853's that could use this.

Thanks...
Just documented a Katech CNC program on a set of 853s recently. Search my threads. Good pics plus flow numbers too
Sorry to the OP
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2018 | 08:24 PM
  #34  
G Atsma's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 22,288
Likes: 3,615
From: Central Cal.
Default

Otherwise TSP does a good job at a reasonable price.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2018 | 09:27 PM
  #35  
cam's Avatar
cam
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,389
Likes: 67
From: in the garage
Default

AI, Bo White

Or some stock 243's

pricey 20hp
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2018 | 11:42 AM
  #36  
76firechicken's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by cam
AI, Bo White

Or some stock 243's

pricey 20hp
It does seem a bit pricey for not much return. Much more to gain with just the cam.

maybe I'll just stay that path and upgrade as I see fit after it's running.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2018 | 11:50 AM
  #37  
cam's Avatar
cam
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,389
Likes: 67
From: in the garage
Default

The ported heads work, no doubt. But the cam transforms the 5.3 from a dog truck 5000RPM slug to a 7000RPM monster ( if big enough on cam)

We've done a pile of combos now, and I only ran ported heads on a couple. Now I use stock castings on everything and add cubes when there is more need. Soooo much better for literally everything. $1500.00 stroker kit and a cheap shelf cam and your in the 600hp range. You could dump 15K into a 5.3 and not get that number, and no where near the torque. Boost is another option that this day and age can be done super cheap, although it is a lot of work, and you must run quality fuel as well as get a very good tune if you want it turn key drive anywhere road worthy.

So I see the 5.3 and 4.8 as budget motors only, they really dont make a lot of sense for much else. Once that is sort of grasped they are HEAPS of fun.

Check this thread out and read the OP's comments.


https://ls1tech.com/forums/conversio...3-ls9-cam.html


btw, milling a stock head and checking clearance with clay is cheap and will REALLY wake it up too. Snappy as hell

check out CR gains without porting. Cost around a hundred bucks to mill

http://www.hotrod.com/articles/0311em-power-squeeze/

Last edited by cam; Jan 12, 2018 at 11:52 AM. Reason: added compression info
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2018 | 04:24 PM
  #38  
DMarts10's Avatar
On The Tree
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 163
Likes: 19
From: MA
Default

Originally Posted by cam
The ported heads work, no doubt. But the cam transforms the 5.3 from a dog truck 5000RPM slug to a 7000RPM monster ( if big enough on cam)

We've done a pile of combos now, and I only ran ported heads on a couple. Now I use stock castings on everything and add cubes when there is more need. Soooo much better for literally everything. $1500.00 stroker kit and a cheap shelf cam and your in the 600hp range. You could dump 15K into a 5.3 and not get that number, and no where near the torque. Boost is another option that this day and age can be done super cheap, although it is a lot of work, and you must run quality fuel as well as get a very good tune if you want it turn key drive anywhere road worthy.

So I see the 5.3 and 4.8 as budget motors only, they really dont make a lot of sense for much else. Once that is sort of grasped they are HEAPS of fun.

Check this thread out and read the OP's comments.


https://ls1tech.com/forums/conversio...3-ls9-cam.html


btw, milling a stock head and checking clearance with clay is cheap and will REALLY wake it up too. Snappy as hell

check out CR gains without porting. Cost around a hundred bucks to mill

http://www.hotrod.com/articles/0311em-power-squeeze/
It’s all preference in the end. I just made 600 whp and 630 rwtq on a Thompson Motorsports forged bottom end 5.3 with 241 heads, and a 76mm on3 turbo at 12psi. Without supporting mods, power plant cost me around $6k.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2018 | 05:52 PM
  #39  
Darth_V8r's Avatar
Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 10,451
Likes: 1,872
From: My own internal universe
Default

Originally Posted by 76firechicken
It does seem a bit pricey for not much return. Much more to gain with just the cam.

maybe I'll just stay that path and upgrade as I see fit after it's running.
The difference is a cam will shift the power band up or down to suit your needs. Heads will generally perform at ALL rpm if they are chosen well for the engine size.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2018 | 06:11 PM
  #40  
01CamaroSSTx's Avatar
11 Second Club
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 5,981
Likes: 2,280
From: Conroe, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by 76firechicken
I have a clean 5.3 block I'm rebuilding at stock bore size with flat top pistons for a reliable NA build to drop in my 76 trans am.

I have 862 heads, I can use but don't know if they're the best option. Are they worth getting ported for my purposes or are aftermarket casting the better option?
Since your staying with stock the stock 862s or 706s are the way to go.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:37 AM.