Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Were did I go wrong with my engine combo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-05-2019, 04:14 PM
  #101  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
mOtOrHeAd MiKe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ottawa Ontario, Canada - where arguing "DA" is for the slow and weak...
Posts: 1,129
Received 32 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Utinator
So, all you really needed was a junkyard 5.3L or 6.0L. You could have boosted either of those up to 500 whp with the supercharger that you had. Do you still have the supercharger?

You asked where your build went wrong, and there it is. You should have stayed boosted to meet your goals.
My point exactly. Put a smaller cam in the engine, put the blower back on, tune, and enjoy.
Old 06-05-2019, 06:32 PM
  #102  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Rickys2003svt.cobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Wapwallopen pa
Posts: 90
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ddnspider
I apologize. I must have misread one of your first posts that sounded like you had 2 options and the vendor steered you towards an 8500 NA setup instead of boost. I would still like to know your definition of streetable. Are you expecting it to drive like stock or do you recognize that to make 500whp, there will be compromises.
I didn’t expect it to drive like stock , I expected when stopping at a red light or a stop sign the car wouldn’t die on me , There was another h/c/I Camaro on the dyno the same day the guy had no problems with it , the shop used tsp prc heads and cam and fast 92 intake, his stock bottom end ls1 made 460 wheel ,
Old 06-05-2019, 06:40 PM
  #103  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,602
Received 1,747 Likes on 1,304 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Rickys2003svt.cobra
I didn’t expect it to drive like stock , I expected when stopping at a red light or a stop sign the car wouldn’t die on me... ,
That is a very reasonable expectation. I would keep the cam for now, consider an intake change, rev to 7200, and most importantly get a 2nd opinion on the tune. Or if you have the means to pull the tune out of the car post it up and some of us who tune can make some observations.
Old 06-05-2019, 06:49 PM
  #104  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Rickys2003svt.cobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Wapwallopen pa
Posts: 90
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mOtOrHeAd MiKe
My point exactly. Put a smaller cam in the engine, put the blower back on, tune, and enjoy.
I sold the vortec g trim, and it wasn’t after cooled. And I wanted to stay n/a. I already have an supercharged pos at home that breaks all the time. That’s y I all I wanted was 500 wrhp and be streetable
Old 06-05-2019, 06:58 PM
  #105  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
AINT SKEERED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Albany La
Posts: 3,985
Received 350 Likes on 239 Posts

Default

An msd will carry further but the fast 102 should pull pretty high as well.
If not with the 4" stroke maybe even the btr intake will shine on this build
Old 06-05-2019, 07:00 PM
  #106  
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Darth_V8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,452
Received 1,851 Likes on 1,152 Posts

Default

I would love to peak at this tune.
Old 06-05-2019, 08:09 PM
  #107  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
onebadbowtie86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Traverse City MI
Posts: 907
Received 64 Likes on 51 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Rickys2003svt.cobra
I didn’t expect it to drive like stock , I expected when stopping at a red light or a stop sign the car wouldn’t die on me , There was another h/c/I Camaro on the dyno the same day the guy had no problems with it , the shop used tsp prc heads and cam and fast 92 intake, his stock bottom end ls1 made 460 wheel ,
Before you start buying and changing parts, spend some time getting what you have sorted out. Theres no reason why your car cant come to a stop and stay running. I have more cam then you with less cubes, other then the choppy idle and worse fuel mileage its not difficult for anyone to drive.
Old 06-05-2019, 11:41 PM
  #108  
TECH Fanatic
 
Bspeck82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,743
Received 424 Likes on 308 Posts
Default

Ya if it can't idle at all and it dies when you come to a stop then we have an issue here. It sounds like it wasn't tuned at all! Doesn't change the fact that the cam is wrong and the fast TB is known to have issues. I'd make them retune it until they get it right. You paid for it right? Make them fix it. If they refuse to fix it for free I'd slam them over every board there is. But make sure everything is in check before you blame the tuner.
Old 06-09-2019, 01:52 AM
  #109  
Launching!
 
Lsbmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Illinois
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 43 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Darth_V8r
I did calculate the IVC. And it is the reason I asked about compression. At 12:1 it would be much better.

Assuming a 4-degree advance on the OP current cam, IVC is still 50 degrees. That is why it is gutless. Low dynamic compression.

To truly take advantage of this cam it needs rpm and compression. If the OP plans to rev this thing, then mill the heads for some compression. Would be a lot of milling. If not, then swap the cam.

If you want to test the theory, out in a keyed timing set much cheaper and advance the cam 3-4 degrees. See how much better it runs.

yes low dynamic compression is what i was getting at.
If some have posted you can tune it in. I would tend to believe them. Most guys on boards with alot of post, helping people out, are usually correct.
I only have 8 post,but i probably have over 4000 dyno pulls under my belt and who knows how many engine combinations.just saying, From single cylinder 4 strokes and 2 strokes to cars. Doesn't matter what the engine, there comes a point where you cant tune it. 1st thing any dyno operator should do, is to look at the combo and determine where peak hp and peak tq are going to land at, before any pulls are done, especially peak tq rpm (If not run away) the engine builder should of already known this tho. Compression sure does help, as do intakes, but i will say this, the one thing you want is the fuel atomize and burn. Combustion is what is needed to increase rpm and keep the dyno chart climbing. More air increases combustion, as would more compression, ,can also change to different fuel with a different burn speed, its hard to argue with more trapped air. Just basic stuff really.
Old 06-09-2019, 09:41 AM
  #110  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 21,284
Received 3,174 Likes on 2,479 Posts
Default

Post count means nada. Experience DOES count. You make several good points.
Welcome aboard, if nobody's said it before!
Old 06-09-2019, 06:35 PM
  #111  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (39)
 
LilJayV10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Evansville,IN
Posts: 9,475
Received 908 Likes on 648 Posts

Default

He got me at, "the one thing you want is the fuel atomize and burn"

that's some forward thinking right there.
Old 06-09-2019, 07:31 PM
  #112  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 21,284
Received 3,174 Likes on 2,479 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LilJayV10
He got me at, "the one thing you want is the fuel atomize and burn"

that's some forward thinking right there.
Got that right! That is the basis for all that is internal combustion efficiency!
Old 06-15-2019, 11:29 PM
  #113  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Rickys2003svt.cobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Wapwallopen pa
Posts: 90
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default


I finally took the car to the track , car idles 100% better than b4 , mph seems low for 448 wrhp Hopefully after the 4th of July I’ll be able to install the new cam from cam motion and warr tb
Old 06-15-2019, 11:31 PM
  #114  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Rickys2003svt.cobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Wapwallopen pa
Posts: 90
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default


Old 06-16-2019, 12:10 AM
  #115  
11 Second Club
 
SoFla01SSLookinstok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,541
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Hey bud. Sorry as didn't see this thread earlier. I have a 383 for maybe just some info on setup/results. I'd like to start by saying to get 500rwhp, through a stalled auto and a 9", is a bit harder than through a M6 & a 12 bolt. So the cam in my 383 is a 235/239 116+2. Only 5* of overlap at .050". Has a lump at idle. Makes peak tq at 4700 peak power around 6500. Revs reach above 7k. Seeing the cam size you have/had and only revving to 6500 is not helping. Seriously if I ever went auto I'd want at least a 4000-4500 stall with my exact engine combo.

It's all about your goals with the car.
Old 06-16-2019, 12:27 AM
  #116  
10 Second Club
 
big hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: over dere
Posts: 3,427
Received 158 Likes on 108 Posts

Default

**** there’s a lot of antiquated, bad info in this thread.
Listen to darth. We go back and for a lot, Dude is a genius
Old 06-16-2019, 12:30 AM
  #117  
11 Second Club
 
SoFla01SSLookinstok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,541
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

What's bad info? Cam too big for only 6500rpm or stall too low where tq is poop?
Old 06-16-2019, 11:32 AM
  #118  
11 Second Club
 
SoFla01SSLookinstok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,541
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

No reply??

Just to clarify. Myself, for one, will never just tell someone to do something on their car. Especially over the net. If someone wants my opinion or I think some info would help I'm glad to give. To me the end decision should be made by the car owner.

I guess I can understand why some think "too much back & forth" or "bad info". But with an engine combo like this there are several ways to go about getting it right. Not only just one. All coming down to what the owner really wants out of the car & what he'd be happy with.

I think there is a lot of good info in this thread about numerous things to think about. At the end of the day the guy who spends more time thinking & researching about a combo to make it right. Will come out on top next to someone who just threw a combo together. (Not against you OP)

Just also know lots of people have gone through this type of thing. I'd hopefully say we'd all like you to be happy with a good performing combo OP.
Old 06-16-2019, 04:38 PM
  #119  
TECH Fanatic
 
stockA4's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 1,114
Received 323 Likes on 228 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rickys2003svt.cobra

I finally took the car to the track , car idles 100% better than b4 , mph seems low for 448 wrhp Hopefully after the 4th of July I’ll be able to install the new cam from cam motion and warr tb
Please have someone knowlegable look at your whole tuneup again before you make it any worse by throwing more parts at it (yes you need a smaller cam thats without question you need to call several vendors and give them your whole setup and then average the results to get it right) get it sorted, the Chassis too your 60ft sucks. I run quicker than you at 3700+lbs on nittos with just bolt-ons, stock heads that have never been off and a low lift truck cam with cheap ls6 springs and I'm shifting that **** at 6800+ Others have gone quicker than that with just bolt-ons lol.

Edit:. JakeFusion is right I'd try something around 6 degrees overlap @ 0.050 to replace the Cam you have, try more stall and then more cam if it's not enough from there

Last edited by stockA4; 06-17-2019 at 09:47 PM.
Old 06-17-2019, 03:18 AM
  #120  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Rickys2003svt.cobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Wapwallopen pa
Posts: 90
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ls7colorado
I still dont see how this cam is TOO BIG ???
Id like to see what it would trap at the track as long

I finally took the car to the track , car idles 100% better than b4 , mph seems low for 448 wrhp Hopefully after the 4th of July I’ll be able to install the new cam from cam motion and warr tb



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:28 AM.