View Poll Results: Best Choice for Engine Project
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 28. You may not vote on this poll
Best choice for engine project?
#21
dont do number one mainly because AI has had issues communicating and getting things done in a timely manner.
im also not a fan of using the converter boxes. never used them but its one of those things i dont believe in using unless you have too (like if it was 2007, and you found a 5000 mile ls7 from a totaled c6z and you wanted to use that motor in something because new gm crate engines are ridiculously high priced) you have plenty of easily accessible 24x options available in 2022
the 10 bolt with 3.73s you may be ok with since you are staying auto but be mindful of this. if you go above 500 rwtq, so any bore size larger than 4", you may be starting to test the limits of that 10 bolt a little bit. the 402 option i think will probably net you about 450-470 rwtq on a mildly to medium built setup. any mildly built lsx 427 with a 4.125 bore will be about 510-525 rwtq.
im also not a fan of using the converter boxes. never used them but its one of those things i dont believe in using unless you have too (like if it was 2007, and you found a 5000 mile ls7 from a totaled c6z and you wanted to use that motor in something because new gm crate engines are ridiculously high priced) you have plenty of easily accessible 24x options available in 2022
the 10 bolt with 3.73s you may be ok with since you are staying auto but be mindful of this. if you go above 500 rwtq, so any bore size larger than 4", you may be starting to test the limits of that 10 bolt a little bit. the 402 option i think will probably net you about 450-470 rwtq on a mildly to medium built setup. any mildly built lsx 427 with a 4.125 bore will be about 510-525 rwtq.
Last edited by Floorman279; 10-09-2022 at 07:15 PM.
#22
The 10bolt would be the weak link for sure but cruising and daily driving maybe not so much. Having a Heidts IRS in the 01 would be pretty cool but the S60 has proven to be reliable thus far and traction control still works.
#23
traction control has not worked for me in car A with the s60 or car B with the MWC fab9.
#24
im also not a fan of using the converter boxes. never used them but its one of those things i dont believe in using unless you have too
the 10 bolt with 3.73s you may be ok with since you are staying auto but be mindful of this. if you go above 500 rwtq, so any bore size larger than 4", you may be starting to test the limits of that 10 bolt a little bit.
01CamaroSSTx is right the 10 bolt is a weak link probably OK for driving around and may live for a while but a replacement would need to be planned.
My 91RS & 99T/A both have Hawk's 8.8's and am happy with them. ABS works normal etc for 99 T/A. Happy with both 8.8's etc.
A friend has the aluminum housing MWC 9 inch and its awesome. Would probably want a MWC 9 or maybe the Dana 44 (need to educate myself on the Dana).
the 402 option i think will probably net you about 450-470 rwtq on a mildly to medium built setup. any mildly built lsx 427 with a 4.125 bore will be about 510-525 rwtq.
Can one do a Watt's link with an S60?
Last edited by 99 Black Bird T/A; 10-09-2022 at 11:25 PM.
#25
It’s easy to get carried away with power numbers and targets. Especially when most advise will steer you towards pushing the envelope. That often results in most likely more powerful combo that will cost way more, but will it really be the one you will enjoy the most?
In my opinion, the best, most fun street combo that even wife will enjoy is the biggest displacement your budget allows with good flowing small port high velocity heads and MILD cam that’s easy on valvetrain and not fuel-smelling.
It will be far more enjoyable as a daily. The hell with peak hp number on dyno that cause smelly exhaust, tuning issues, potential valvetrain issues, damaged lifters or at the very least periodic valve springs replacements.
That said, in short term considering cost and your parts on hand, if the LS1 is in good shape, I’d go with option #1, but would use smaller chamber TEA 706 heads over AI 241s for higher compression.
You already have tons of hands-on experience and probably know better what is best for you and your wife.
In my opinion, the best, most fun street combo that even wife will enjoy is the biggest displacement your budget allows with good flowing small port high velocity heads and MILD cam that’s easy on valvetrain and not fuel-smelling.
It will be far more enjoyable as a daily. The hell with peak hp number on dyno that cause smelly exhaust, tuning issues, potential valvetrain issues, damaged lifters or at the very least periodic valve springs replacements.
That said, in short term considering cost and your parts on hand, if the LS1 is in good shape, I’d go with option #1, but would use smaller chamber TEA 706 heads over AI 241s for higher compression.
You already have tons of hands-on experience and probably know better what is best for you and your wife.
Last edited by cino; 10-10-2022 at 09:59 AM.
The following users liked this post:
G Atsma (10-10-2022)
#26
@cino that's an outstanding point about enjoying, cost and project creep. The mod's to the car have been covered by selling & swapping parts and using hand me downs parts from my my T/A. An all out, new engine, new transmission & new rear build would definitely have a lot of out of pocket cost and not add much to my wife's enjoying the car.
The 263,000 mile LS1 is very healthy other than nasty sounding piston slap on cold start in the morning. Sounds like a diesel briefly. Wife, stepson & myself allow the Z28 to warm up (slap go away) before driving. Burns half a quart of oil ~2,000 miles. Valve stem seals never replaced. Holds oil pressure like new with the thin Mobile 1 synthetic 5w-30. Previous owner had various gaskets & crank seals replaced, new oil pump & new timing set etc installed by Subaru dealer (former GM dealership). No leaks etc.
The AI 241's have the welded high compression 58cc chambers. I think on a stock LS1 good for ~11.65 compression. The TEA S2's 5.3 probably about same after being decked and cleaned up for use.
Adding ~1.5 pts of compression over stock on a high mile LS1 w/piston slap? Ring wear concerns?
The 263,000 mile LS1 is very healthy other than nasty sounding piston slap on cold start in the morning. Sounds like a diesel briefly. Wife, stepson & myself allow the Z28 to warm up (slap go away) before driving. Burns half a quart of oil ~2,000 miles. Valve stem seals never replaced. Holds oil pressure like new with the thin Mobile 1 synthetic 5w-30. Previous owner had various gaskets & crank seals replaced, new oil pump & new timing set etc installed by Subaru dealer (former GM dealership). No leaks etc.
The AI 241's have the welded high compression 58cc chambers. I think on a stock LS1 good for ~11.65 compression. The TEA S2's 5.3 probably about same after being decked and cleaned up for use.
Adding ~1.5 pts of compression over stock on a high mile LS1 w/piston slap? Ring wear concerns?
#27
I sent Strange my 4 channel backing plates when I did mine and I guess my ABS sensors are still in good shape cause when my back tires let got with the ASR light on the traction light comes on and the gas pedal still goes wonky. 99 car had 3 channel and I've deleted the ABS from it.
#28
I would go the 402 route. More bore means more head options later on down the road not to mention you spoke on having a FAT torque curve. Torque=FUN
Im not a fan of the 383ci motors. They can be hit or miss. Ive seen some sbe LS1s put down similiar numbers/e.ts as a LS 383ci setup... its not the same bore and stroke as a old school 383ci small block chevy. I think that may play a role with it. Who knows ?
Im not a fan of the 383ci motors. They can be hit or miss. Ive seen some sbe LS1s put down similiar numbers/e.ts as a LS 383ci setup... its not the same bore and stroke as a old school 383ci small block chevy. I think that may play a role with it. Who knows ?
The following users liked this post:
99 Black Bird T/A (10-10-2022)
#29
The AI 241's have the welded high compression 58cc chambers. I think on a stock LS1 good for ~11.65 compression. The TEA S2's 5.3 probably about same after being decked and cleaned up for use.
Adding ~1.5 pts of compression over stock on a high mile LS1 w/piston slap? Ring wear concerns?
Adding ~1.5 pts of compression over stock on a high mile LS1 w/piston slap? Ring wear concerns?
If you plan to refresh one of your engines, selling good running LS1 and rebuilding LS2 makes more sense performance and budget wise.
The following users liked this post:
99 Black Bird T/A (10-10-2022)
#30
Read GM rated LS1 rings at ~ 300,000 miles durability. With 263,000 miles on the clock, probably to late for H&C.
@PREDATOR-Z said in #57 of highest-mileage-cam-swap-poll
"Miles are not the only determining factor, but the health of your motor.
My advice before camming:
1- Leakdown test
2- Compression test
Only based on the results then make a decision."
#31
I went the 403 route and it's awesome but I kind of wish I'd spent a little more for a 427. I have a 6-speed and have some bucking with this cam, but it made 500 rwhp. You should have an easier time getting it to drive good with an auto.
new LS2 block
SRP 11.5:1 - 2618 pistons
Callies Compstar 4" crank & 6.125" rods
Improved Racing windage tray
PRC LS6 ported heads
Fast 92 intake / Nick Williams TB
CamMotion LLSR 236/240 - .640/.615 - on 113 + 3
new LS2 block
SRP 11.5:1 - 2618 pistons
Callies Compstar 4" crank & 6.125" rods
Improved Racing windage tray
PRC LS6 ported heads
Fast 92 intake / Nick Williams TB
CamMotion LLSR 236/240 - .640/.615 - on 113 + 3
The following users liked this post:
99 Black Bird T/A (10-11-2022)
#32
@TA_Freak yes please, I'd like to see a copy of the build sheet. How are you like the SD tune?
2.73's sounds like great mpg. What's the highway?
2.73's sounds like great mpg. What's the highway?
Also yes, I do like the 2.73 on the highway, although I have no numbers as to what my mileage is.
The following users liked this post:
99 Black Bird T/A (10-11-2022)
#33
TA_Freak, thank for the build list and information. Driving is mostly in town these days with several long trips that average it out. I probably keep the MAF.
Hiltsy855, sounds like a sweet LLSR 403 set up with quality parts that makes excellent numbers! Getting 500+ whp from ported LS6 heads is outstanding in my book. Do you have a build thread? Would enjoy taking a look etc.
Hiltsy855, sounds like a sweet LLSR 403 set up with quality parts that makes excellent numbers! Getting 500+ whp from ported LS6 heads is outstanding in my book. Do you have a build thread? Would enjoy taking a look etc.
#34
No I didn't make a build thread, seemed like they were a dime a dozen a few years ago when I built it LOL. I need to make a correction - the SRP pistons are 4032 forgings not 2618. I feel like the key was working with the machine shop to get the bores sized properly for .002" clearance. I have 4 summers on the engine now and it doesn't burn a drop of oil and no piston slap on a cold start.
The following users liked this post:
99 Black Bird T/A (10-12-2022)
#35
99 Black Bird T/A-
Lots of stuff being kicked around here. Any of the narrowing down process happening yet?
You put some great choices up in the poll. I would have a tough time with it.
My choice of camming a 430HP LS3 was just to keep it simple and enjoy the ride, but messing with the Lingenfelter box apparently has its issues with some here.
And putting in a 24x reluctor would un-simplify things a BUNCH.
This is a great thread!
Lots of stuff being kicked around here. Any of the narrowing down process happening yet?
You put some great choices up in the poll. I would have a tough time with it.
My choice of camming a 430HP LS3 was just to keep it simple and enjoy the ride, but messing with the Lingenfelter box apparently has its issues with some here.
And putting in a 24x reluctor would un-simplify things a BUNCH.
This is a great thread!
#36
The GMPP LS6's are obsolete compared to newer offering. However, the old LS6's with big ~245cc intakes ports would work for my fun 427 LS build. Upgrade to an LS7 top end later to make more hp if desired.
You put some great choices up in the poll. I would have a tough time with it.
#3 the 383 is so KISS (keep it simple stupid) it has real let's just get this done appeal. Allows for selling of lots of parts too. Just drop off the T/A's old LS1, EPS cam and Summit stroker crank at engine shop and come back for a nice 383 ready to swap into the 02 Z28. Would need rods & pistons etc. It would make decent power but nothing to write home about.
My choice of camming a 430HP LS3 was just to keep it simple and enjoy the ride, but messing with the Lingenfelter box apparently has its issues with some here.
And putting in a 24x reluctor would un-simplify things a BUNCH.
And putting in a 24x reluctor would un-simplify things a BUNCH.
GM offers a 24x 6.0 iron block that's pretty sweet. Probably should have added it as an option except as a purist I like aluminum block V8's, nearly as exotic where I grew up as a Ferrari v12 engine...
Lot folks don't want the LPE box for different reasons. These seem most common:
1) The slight delay on start sometimes as the box syncs
2) Or to avoid the delay doing the double key bump.
3) Botched install
4) Horror stories (due to botched install usually)
5) Worry about added complexity if repairs needed
Talked with my local shop about swapping reluctor wheels from 58x to 24x they were less than enthusiastic due to labor intensive. My 99 T/A has done well for five years with the LPE 58x to 24x box. Trick is have a quality install and keeping box away from heat. T/A has had zero issues with the LPE box. However, there's always the long term concern about any special electronics over time. Probably ought to pick up a spare box just in case.
For the record, I'd worry more about an MSD box dying and stranding you than the LPE's box. Have seen several MSD boxes do that over the years.
This is a great thread!
It also seems like with the wonderful GM crate LS engines available a great time to discuss too.
Last edited by 99 Black Bird T/A; 10-12-2022 at 11:44 AM.
The following users liked this post:
G Atsma (10-12-2022)
#37
I have an ironblock based 414 with l92 heads numbers in sig. runs on a 98 ECM.
simplifies things as far as ecm communication and retaining stock gauges and what nots ( I un simplified it by going stand alone ECM which makes me wish i had just done an ls3) I like number 4 as to me this is simple. turn key, no questions and good power out of the box with room to grow. scope creep here but one could just run a newer ecm and a holly prodash and skip the reluctor wheel issue...
That said option 5 of a 427 in a camaro puts a grin on my face and was my original plan for my bird. either of those are good choices in my book
simplifies things as far as ecm communication and retaining stock gauges and what nots ( I un simplified it by going stand alone ECM which makes me wish i had just done an ls3) I like number 4 as to me this is simple. turn key, no questions and good power out of the box with room to grow. scope creep here but one could just run a newer ecm and a holly prodash and skip the reluctor wheel issue...
That said option 5 of a 427 in a camaro puts a grin on my face and was my original plan for my bird. either of those are good choices in my book
#38
I'm a big fan of this as well, It just makes sense if you're going to use it on the street all the time, and especially if you spend much time above 60 mph.
Blackbird Do you still have the stock converter in it? Leave it in there a little longer and try this first, It would get incredible mileage, The loose converter is going to kill the fuel mileage and every time you are on a hill barely moving at 3,000 RPM and you're being passed by a kid in Honda That's laughing because he thinks your car is broken you are going to hate it
If you don't have an ET goal in mind or a sworn enemy that you're always trying to beat from a dig a big stall, low gears, and a big cam is still a big waste on the street. This is why I have two cars to play with, one with 4.10 and one with 2.73. The 2.73 car is much quicker and stealthier on the street, much easier to get the power down usefully.
Put a crate LS3 in it and use the SDPC PowerMax cam that works with the stock LS3 springs, It's a 204/222 112lsa and It will make more power everywhere You want it with a baby smooth idle.
#39
Blackbyrd, your ironblock based 414 with l92 heads w/98 ECM makes a sweet 530whp that's had to argue with! I'll have to read up on newer ecm's and a holly prodash to skip the reluctor wheel issue...that's probably beyond my scope and budget but it sure looks interesting! Option of a 427 in a camaro puts a grin on my face too!
Yes, still have stock converter and original 4L60E in the 02 Z28.
I don't think a nice tight Yank 3600SS w/3.73's will drive quite that loose in a 4th Gen. A friend has a Yank 3600SS w/3.73's in his 00 B4C Camaro and it drove pretty well in traffic. He's let me drive his car couple of times. My 72 vette has a nice tight Yank 3,200 (no lock up) TH400 w/3.08's, drives very close to stock.
Gas mileage takes a hit that's true.
No ET in mind & no rivals. My 99T/A once caused someone to trade his R/T for a 392...guess he didn't get the loan for the Hellcat...lol
A++ always good to have two cars! That's a great situation. Currently, have four cars, am limited by garage space, budget and wife's tolerance of hobby.
That 1st that 2nd shift w/4L60e is like going off a cliff....6500 rpm in 1st to like 3300 rpm in 2nd...that doesn't matter normal driving...but when it matters...it really matters. Gears and converter really help.
Definitely agree easier to get power down with 2.73's & 3.08's etc on the street.
Interesting idea, yesterday was kicking around idea of an old LPE GT 2-3 cam (207/220 on ~118) in an LS3, not too far off the LS6Plus cam.
Keep the tall gears and just add cubes, Gooood boy! I'm a big fan of this as well, It just makes sense if you're going to use it on the street all the time, and especially if you spend much time above 60 mph.
Blackbird Do you still have the stock converter in it? Leave it in there a little longer and try this first, It would get incredible mileage, The loose converter is going to kill the fuel mileage and every time you are on a hill barely moving at 3,000 RPM and you're being passed by a kid in Honda That's laughing because he thinks your car is broken you are going to hate it.
Blackbird Do you still have the stock converter in it? Leave it in there a little longer and try this first, It would get incredible mileage, The loose converter is going to kill the fuel mileage and every time you are on a hill barely moving at 3,000 RPM and you're being passed by a kid in Honda That's laughing because he thinks your car is broken you are going to hate it.
I don't think a nice tight Yank 3600SS w/3.73's will drive quite that loose in a 4th Gen. A friend has a Yank 3600SS w/3.73's in his 00 B4C Camaro and it drove pretty well in traffic. He's let me drive his car couple of times. My 72 vette has a nice tight Yank 3,200 (no lock up) TH400 w/3.08's, drives very close to stock.
Gas mileage takes a hit that's true.
If you don't have an ET goal in mind or a sworn enemy that you're always trying to beat from a dig a big stall, low gears, and a big cam is still a big waste on the street.
This is why I have two cars to play with, one with 4.10 and one with 2.73. The 2.73 car is much quicker and stealthier on the street, much easier to get the power down usefully.
That 1st that 2nd shift w/4L60e is like going off a cliff....6500 rpm in 1st to like 3300 rpm in 2nd...that doesn't matter normal driving...but when it matters...it really matters. Gears and converter really help.
Definitely agree easier to get power down with 2.73's & 3.08's etc on the street.
Put a crate LS3 in it and use the SDPC PowerMax cam that works with the stock LS3 springs, It's a 204/222 112lsa and It will make more power everywhere You want it with a baby smooth idle.
Last edited by 99 Black Bird T/A; 10-12-2022 at 02:36 PM.