Biggest cam for Lq4?
#1
Teching In
Thread Starter
Biggest cam for Lq4?
Hi there, pretty much my first time posting so forgive me for anything I miss. I have been looking at the Comp 54-469-11 cam for my Lq4 build. It will be going in a 65 C10, likley with a T56, As a fun street driver. In some of Richard Holdener's vids, he says that this is getting close to as big of a cam you would want to put in a 6.0. Has anyone on here used this cam, or similar? Is there really any benefit from using a slightly bigger cam? or does the drivability suffer more that the benefits? My lq4 was out of an 07 Silverado, and has fly cut pistons. Will include picture below. I'm assuming this will give me a bit more PTV clearance, and maybe more options for a cam? I plan on using the BTR 660 platinum valve spring kit.
One last question, the Comp 54-469-11 can be found on summit for $515.95, yet summit has a cam with simmilar specs, for $299.99. Will include links below. Is it really worth the extra money for the Comp? I am also not sure if the Summit cam will clear, as it is slightly larger. Any help or information is greatly appreciated.
Summit cam: https://www.summitracing.com/parts/s...make/chevrolet
Comp cam: https://www.summitracing.com/parts/c...make/chevrolet
One last question, the Comp 54-469-11 can be found on summit for $515.95, yet summit has a cam with simmilar specs, for $299.99. Will include links below. Is it really worth the extra money for the Comp? I am also not sure if the Summit cam will clear, as it is slightly larger. Any help or information is greatly appreciated.
Summit cam: https://www.summitracing.com/parts/s...make/chevrolet
Comp cam: https://www.summitracing.com/parts/c...make/chevrolet
#2
TECH Senior Member
Those pistons look as cast or formed, not fly-cut.
#4
TECH Senior Member
BTW, Summit's cams are very good. Save the $215....
#6
Teching In
Thread Starter
Hmm, so if I were to go with the summit cam, which is a 234/248, 113 +3.5 Lsa, it shouldn't be an issue with PTV clearance? I don't necessarily want to use the absolute biggest, since this is going to be a street vehicle and I would like to have decent driveability. The motor will be going in a 65 C10, although not super heavy (probably about 3800lbs), would going with a cam this size or bigger seriously affect the low end?
#7
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Hmm, so if I were to go with the summit cam, which is a 234/248, 113 +3.5 Lsa, it shouldn't be an issue with PTV clearance? I don't necessarily want to use the absolute biggest, since this is going to be a street vehicle and I would like to have decent driveability. The motor will be going in a 65 C10, although not super heavy (probably about 3800lbs), would going with a cam this size or bigger seriously affect the low end?
Trending Topics
#8
Teching In
Thread Starter
alright, I mean im ok if it doesn't have quite the same low rpm torque. Im used to daily driving the stock 230 i6 with a 3 speed lol. In Richard holdeners video with the Comp 54-469-11, it maintained pretty decent low end, with some good gains on the top. Im assuming the summit would be pretty close to that, since the specs are close. I just want to confirm that It wont create PTV issues. Also, I've looked but am not quite sure on what the +3.5 Lsa will affect in terms of sound, power, etc?
#9
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Hmm, so if I were to go with the summit cam, which is a 234/248, 113 +3.5 Lsa, it shouldn't be an issue with PTV clearance? I don't necessarily want to use the absolute biggest, since this is going to be a street vehicle and I would like to have decent driveability. The motor will be going in a 65 C10, although not super heavy (probably about 3800lbs), would going with a cam this size or bigger seriously affect the low end?
In a heavy car you want power made as early as possible in the rpm range so you can get that thing moving and moving quickly out the gate.
So unless you’re looking to do a max effort 6.0 do what most people with common sense do. Get a cam that will fit your every day driving that way you have usable tq and hp in the rpm range you’re going to be at majority of the time.
If you’re dead set on a max effort cam go with a max effort cam but it gets old after a while especially if majority of your time in that vehicle is on pavement not the strip.
The following 3 users liked this post by 02*C5:
#10
Teching In
Thread Starter
Ok, yeah I get what your saying. I'm kinda looking to avoid the price tag on the Comp, and I think I will go with one of the Summit Pro Ls cams. Now im looking at the 8711r1 assuming it wont be an issue with PTV clearance when degreed.. After watching Richards video on the stage 4, (his was the no longer available 234/247 version), It seemed to maintain the low end pretty well and im ok with that. Now im just kind of wondering how the 113 +3.5 Lsa affects it compared to a straight up 113 Lsa. Would that be considered a wider lsa than just 113? where would that put my overlap at? Sorry if these questions sound dumb, im just trying to wrap my head around this a bit better and I really appreciate all of the responses.
8711r1: https://www.summitracing.com/parts/sum-8711r1
8711r1: https://www.summitracing.com/parts/sum-8711r1
#11
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Ok, yeah I get what your saying. I'm kinda looking to avoid the price tag on the Comp, and I think I will go with one of the Summit Pro Ls cams. Now im looking at the 8711r1 assuming it wont be an issue with PTV clearance when degreed.. After watching Richards video on the stage 4, (his was the no longer available 234/247 version), It seemed to maintain the low end pretty well and im ok with that. Now im just kind of wondering how the 113 +3.5 Lsa affects it compared to a straight up 113 Lsa. Would that be considered a wider lsa than just 113? where would that put my overlap at? Sorry if these questions sound dumb, im just trying to wrap my head around this a bit better and I really appreciate all of the responses.
8711r1: https://www.summitracing.com/parts/sum-8711r1
8711r1: https://www.summitracing.com/parts/sum-8711r1
Here’s a cam that will in my eye be a better shot e. Look at the charts. Remember that these cams are made to make power and tq. Designed for trucks.
https://briantooleyracing.com/btr-ge...orris-cam.html
The following users liked this post:
G Atsma (07-11-2023)
#12
That's a lot of camshaft for 9.4 compression. Are you planning different heads to bump the compression? Gears? Hopefully long tube headers are in the plans too. Bigger throttle body? Better intake?When the right parts are matched together for the drivers use, it's a beautiful thing. Mismatched can make driving it miserable.
You'd be much better off with the 8707R1. No ones going to be impressed with the size of your camshaft when the Pruis in the next lane bests you the first 50 yards.
You'd be much better off with the 8707R1. No ones going to be impressed with the size of your camshaft when the Pruis in the next lane bests you the first 50 yards.
The following 4 users liked this post by 68Formula:
#13
Teching In
Thread Starter
Yes, I am going to be using 243 heads, longtubes, likley gears at some point, I would like to also run a tbss intake, throttle body is still to be determined. This should be a fairly solid combo for that cam?
The following 3 users liked this post by 02*C5:
#15
TECH Senior Member
The rowdiest cam in the world ain't much good if it can't pull wet T.P. apart....
The following 3 users liked this post by G Atsma:
The following users liked this post:
02*C5 (07-11-2023)
#18
Now if you add some 3.73-4.10 rear gears, stepping up to the 8710R1 is workable but it'll want to be shifted 6500+rpm to get the full benefit. Still be a little soggy part throttle without the gears, but liveable until the upgrade.
That 8711 wants even more compression, ported heads, lighter vehicle, 4.10s, etc. And/or more cubes.
Your throttle body will be limited to 90mm with the TBSS (92mm if you port the manifold throat out - honestly not worth the work unless it was a strip vehicle). Going bigger by using an adapter doesn't gain anything if the manifold throat is smaller than the throttle body bore.
#19
Teching In
Thread Starter
Im still yet to find a transmission, so it may not be the T56, but rather the T56 family, mabye Tkx, Tko, Magnum, etc. I guess im just not really getting how the 8711r1 would be so terrible down low. Richard ran it on a 5.3 and it was an improvement over the LS9 cam everywhere. He said himself that the Ls9 cam has a soft low-end, but is it really that bad? im also assuming that a 6.0 would handle the low-end better than the 5.3? About compression, assuming it wouldn't cause PTV issues, I wouldn't be against running a thinner head gasket to give a bit more of a compression bump. Might have forgot to add, but just thought I better say that this truck really wont be doing any "truck" things like towing, hauling a load, etc.
#20
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Im still yet to find a transmission, so it may not be the T56, but rather the T56 family, mabye Tkx, Tko, Magnum, etc. I guess im just not really getting how the 8711r1 would be so terrible down low. Richard ran it on a 5.3 and it was an improvement over the LS9 cam everywhere. He said himself that the Ls9 cam has a soft low-end, but is it really that bad? im also assuming that a 6.0 would handle the low-end better than the 5.3? About compression, assuming it wouldn't cause PTV issues, I wouldn't be against running a thinner head gasket to give a bit more of a compression bump. Might have forgot to add, but just thought I better say that this truck really wont be doing any "truck" things like towing, hauling a load, etc.