Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Cam advice? Split, reverse split or equal?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 17, 2004 | 08:25 PM
  #221  
mrr23's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,266
Likes: 0
From: orlando, fl
Default

Originally Posted by jrp


now only if Ed would answer his damn emails ...

and its also the people who know all that info on his cam form that are putting out the best numbers and the fastest times. and the ones that dont wonder why there down on times and numbers from people who have the same setups...
i don't disagree at all. but average consumers may not be looking for the best numbers and fastest times. they might be looking for better towing capability or just some quicker acceleration from the light. not wanting to turn 7000 rpms to get the advantage of what that cam can do.

my original concern was someone saying the LS1 intake is such a 'crippling restriction' that a reverse split was in need to compensate for it. the only two dynos in this thread show it's not a restriction until 5500 rpms. when you are trying to exceed it's designed parameters.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2004 | 08:27 PM
  #222  
Sport Side's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
Default

Originally Posted by mrr23
i don't disagree at all. but average consumers may not be looking for the best numbers and fastest times. they might be looking for better towing capability or just some quicker acceleration from the light. not wanting to turn 7000 rpms to get the advantage of what that cam can do.
well you can have a cam custom spec'd to do that too.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2004 | 08:30 PM
  #223  
mrr23's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,266
Likes: 0
From: orlando, fl
Default

Originally Posted by SportSide 5.3
well you can have a cam custom spec'd to do that too.
you sure can. you can also buy a shelf cam that'll do the same thing and not have to worry about having to buy another cam later just because you changed from stock manifolds to headers. after all a custom spec'd cam is designed for that exact application right?

my only reason for being in here was about reverse split cams solving a 'crippling restricted' intake. out of the 2 dynos shown in this thread, neither reverse cam made any appreciable difference until 5500 rpms. even a single pattern out did both splits under 5500 rpms. the intake is not a restriction until you go outside of it's designed parameters.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2004 | 08:32 PM
  #224  
Sport Side's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
Default

lol. most pick the cam last. whoever custom specs a cam to there engine and then goes out and buys some headers is dumb.

i'm sorry but that has to be the most retarded argument i've ever heard. seriously. oh geez.

oops you edited.

this right here was my reference
you sure can. you can also buy a shelf cam that'll do the same thing and not have to worry about having to buy another cam later just because you changed from stock manifolds to headers. after all a custom spec'd cam is designed for that exact application right?
definetly still laughing.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2004 | 08:35 PM
  #225  
mrr23's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,266
Likes: 0
From: orlando, fl
Default

Originally Posted by SportSide 5.3
lol. most pick the cam last. whoever custom specs a cam to there engine and then goes out and buys some headers is dumb.
boy you sure just pissed off some people that run bigger cams with stock manifolds. then later buy headers. most of the time a cam will produce more power than a set of headers. and costs less. and a bigger company like SLP that put a reverse split cam in a guys car without headers.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2004 | 08:37 PM
  #226  
jrp's Avatar
jrp
SN95 Director
20 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,755
Likes: 7
From: Valencia, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by mrr23
i don't disagree at all. but average consumers may not be looking for the best numbers and fastest times. they might be looking for better towing capability or just some quicker acceleration from the light. not wanting to turn 7000 rpms to get the advantage of what that cam can do.

my original concern was someone saying the LS1 intake is such a 'crippling restriction' that a reverse split was in need to compensate for it. the only two dynos in this thread show it's not a restriction until 5500 rpms. when you are trying to exceed it's designed parameters.
the ls1 intake is restrictive, i have the flow through of my heads through a radius plate, ls6 intake, ls1 intake, and exhaust through a 1.75 pipe. the ls1 intake severly stiffles the cfm that that motor see's.

also, its the average consumer that bitches and complains the most when there package they buy doesnt put out the same numbers that a person with the same or similar mods does because that person maximized there combo to the fullest.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2004 | 08:38 PM
  #227  
Sport Side's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
Default

wait and think about what you said.

a camshaft custom spec'd to an application. then a guy goes and buys headers. now his setup isn't custom spec'd.

but if i go buy an off the shelf cam specd to fit a bunch of motors, or a best guess between alot of motors. swapping headers afterwards wont be a big deal.

its like your saying the box cam is made to work with all sorts of motors so it wont matter.

idk. i just thought it was goofy.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2004 | 08:43 PM
  #228  
mrr23's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,266
Likes: 0
From: orlando, fl
Default

Originally Posted by SportSide 5.3
wait and think about what you said.

a camshaft custom spec'd to an application. then a guy goes and buys headers. now his setup isn't custom spec'd.

but if i go buy an off the shelf cam specd to fit a bunch of motors, or a best guess between alot of motors. swapping headers afterwards wont be a big deal.

its like your saying the box cam is made to work with all sorts of motors so it wont matter.

idk. i just thought it was goofy.
would you rather buy a cam once or twice. agreed most people don't do a cam before all bolt ons are done. but people do. knowing later they'll add more bolt ons. but they wanted the most power the cheapest way right now.

i just spent $1100 on a set of bassani headers w/catted y-pipe that only gave me 10 rwhp. man that equates to $100/hp . but if i did a cam that would've been about $600 inlcuding springs. lets say it gave me only 20 rwhp. that's $30/hp. damn which would you do first? people look at cost as well as parts.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2004 | 07:50 AM
  #229  
mrr23's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,266
Likes: 0
From: orlando, fl
Default

Originally Posted by jrp
here is the E/I ratio for my heads (stg 1) flown with my ls6 intake and 1.75 pipe on the exhaust

.050 = 90%
.100 = 92%
.150 = 82%
.200 = 74%
.250 = 71%
.300 = 70%
.350 = 70%
.400 = 71%
.450 = 71%
.500 = 72%
.550 = 73%
.600 = 75%
what stage 1 heads are they?
well it still looks like candidate for either a single pattern cam or standard split using everyones basis for 75-80% before a reverse split would be in order. but now we have some info on what a head can flow with both the intake and exhaust attached. still not seeing the over 80% when and exhaust pipe is attached that some were speculating would happen.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2004 | 07:51 AM
  #230  
Eye's Avatar
Eye
Teching In
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Ontario Canada
Default

I run a mti stealth 2. Its sounds close to stock. Power is up everywhere. I think anyone who would want a vinci grind cam. A smaller area under the curve cam i mean would be smarter looking at a stealth 2. Its a reverse spilt. I run a ls1 intake. This is why i went with a reverse spilt cam.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2004 | 08:06 AM
  #231  
mrr23's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,266
Likes: 0
From: orlando, fl
Default

Originally Posted by Eye
I run a mti stealth 2. Its sounds close to stock. Power is up everywhere. I think anyone who would want a vinci grind cam. A smaller area under the curve cam i mean would be smarter looking at a stealth 2. Its a reverse spilt. I run a ls1 intake. This is why i went with a reverse spilt cam.
if you are comparing it to a stock ls1 cam, sure power will be up everywhere. my comparisons are based on the 2 dynos presented here showing aftermarket cams. the only time the reverse split cam made more power than any other type of aftermarket cam was after 5500 rpms. never said the cam wouldn't make power. the reverse split moved the powerband upward.

i think you are using terms incorrectly there. clarify what you mean by smaller area under the curve.

and you based your decision of using a reverse split cam just because you have ls1 intake? when i do put the 047 cam in, i'll be keeping my ls1 intake as well.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2004 | 12:57 PM
  #232  
critter's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,001
Likes: 0
From: Goshen, IN
Default

My cam is conventional split seat to seat, equal at 0.050", and reverse split at 0.200". In this split debate, how would you classify my cam?
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2004 | 01:15 PM
  #233  
Sport Side's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
Default

You answered your own question because you wouldn't be able to throw a label onto it.

equal at 0.050", and reverse split at 0.200".
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2004 | 01:35 PM
  #234  
critter's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,001
Likes: 0
From: Goshen, IN
Default

Originally Posted by SportSide 5.3
You answered your own question because you wouldn't be able to throw a label onto it.
That is the point, isn't it? My cam would fall on either side of the debate, depending on which spec was chosen.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2004 | 02:50 PM
  #235  
Sport Side's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
Default

understood.

crit, are you using one of Shaun's camshafts?
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2004 | 02:54 PM
  #236  
Sport Side's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
Default

Before I tell all of you my mods let me tell you about my brain fart. I forgot to turn off the A/C durin g the dyno run. I know, I know! Well anyways these are my mods:

1. Custom 93PONY cam 220/220
2. Asp pulley
3. 916's no titanium retainers(they sent me the wrong ones)
4. LS6 intake
5. cheap deck lid
6. Stock roller rockers (yella Teraas waited for install)
7. No tuning
8. Jet Hot headers and off road Y
9. Magnaflow catback

The car was running lean as high as 15.0 A/F in some points. 13.8 from 4200 to 6100. The cam should make power to 6300 but the rev limiter limited me. Anyways, I made 394.5 RWHP SAE and 377 lbs torque SAE. The cam made over 340 lbs tq from 3100 to 6000 RPMs. The guy said that with the A/C off I would have made over 400 HP. Sweet! Major brainfart but I am still stoked.

The Yella Terras go on this Friday and I am going to fix the restriction in the Y. It shrinks to 2.7 inches where the Y goes in the reduced part of the catback. I still have to do the throttle blade mod and install a better deck lid. Then there is the tuning. Finally, my ram air doesn't work unless I am moving over 40mph. THis thing should scream when I am all done. I figure I should be right at 420 RWHP and 390 RWTQ when I am done. Thanks shaun for the sweet cam.
Found this. Crit, is this close to the cam your running?
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2004 | 03:02 PM
  #237  
Eye's Avatar
Eye
Teching In
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Ontario Canada
Default

I have seen the light. Im going to order a vinci .047 cam too. I made a big mistake useing a stealth 2 cam. The vinci .047 will make my car fly. The vinci .047's cams area under the curve is so much larger than my mti cam.Mrr23 your a good sales man.Thanks!
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2004 | 04:09 PM
  #238  
Sport Side's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
Default

Could anyone p.m. me the VE's to the TR220 on a 112lsa?
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2004 | 04:57 PM
  #239  
critter's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,001
Likes: 0
From: Goshen, IN
Default

Originally Posted by SportSide 5.3
understood.

crit, are you using one of Shaun's camshafts?
Not from him, but he (and indirectly Ed) helped greatly with the design.

No, mine is 232/232. Seems to work well. I'm currently at 11.0x @ 121-3 with a motor that has 20% leakage. I don't know exactly how much the leakage hurts, but it must be some ...
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2004 | 06:21 PM
  #240  
Sport Side's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
Default

Ed. that stinker. He's gettin more business than you'd think around here.

Critter.

whos lobes? guessing comp? xe-r profile? did you do your own valve event choosing w/ the help of Ed/Shaun?
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:12 AM.