Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Which Heads Are Better: Ls6, 5.3, Or 6.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-12-2004, 09:29 PM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
SICKBIRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: DALLAS
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Which Heads Are Better: Ls6, 5.3, Or 6.0

Which Heads Are Better: Ls6, 5.3, Or 6.0

With This Cam: 228*234*607*598 @110
Old 10-12-2004, 09:37 PM
  #2  
Launching!
 
2002$$'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: san jose,CA
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

im also interested to hear the answer to this question.BUT i THINK the biggest difference between these heads is the rpm range in which you want the majority of your power.even though i could be wrong.i beleive that each set of heads creates a different compression ratio also.
Old 10-12-2004, 09:43 PM
  #3  
Staging Lane
 
moyam01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It depends. The LS6 and the LQ9 heads are the same. The only thing is that the LQ9 head combustion chamber is bigger, so it allows you to have a lower compression. But they have the same flow, and characteristics.
Old 10-12-2004, 09:50 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
 
frey51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Old 10-12-2004, 09:51 PM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Z-286speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

5.3 heads i believe raise the compression so you can run different rockers and such.
Old 10-12-2004, 10:56 PM
  #6  
jrp
SN95 Director
iTrader: (16)
 
jrp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Valencia, Ca
Posts: 10,755
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by moyam01
It depends. The LS6 and the LQ9 heads are the same. The only thing is that the LQ9 head combustion chamber is bigger, so it allows you to have a lower compression. But they have the same flow, and characteristics.
they have similar ports and flow but not the same, the 243 ls6 casting is still top dog in flow and power.
Old 10-12-2004, 10:57 PM
  #7  
jrp
SN95 Director
iTrader: (16)
 
jrp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Valencia, Ca
Posts: 10,755
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Z-286speed
5.3 heads i believe raise the compression so you can run different rockers and such.
what does compression have to do with rocker choices
Old 10-12-2004, 10:58 PM
  #8  
jrp
SN95 Director
iTrader: (16)
 
jrp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Valencia, Ca
Posts: 10,755
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

what it boils down to is how big your wallet is. a stg 2 5.3 head would be the best bet IMO.
Old 10-12-2004, 11:09 PM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
cyphur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North Texas
Posts: 8,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i'm savin for stg 2 ls6 heads....just tryin to find some cheap cores

5.3's raise your compression a lil bit, 6.0L's drop them. LS6's bump a tad but not much. Where the LS6 heads really shine is under the curve....thats where you'll see the biggest gains over the other heads. But as JRP pointed out, you'll pay for them.
Old 10-12-2004, 11:11 PM
  #10  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
SICKBIRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: DALLAS
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Thanx For Info Guys
Old 10-13-2004, 02:38 AM
  #11  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
CHAGO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Northwest Houston
Posts: 5,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

whats the difference between LQ4 6.0 heads and LQ9 6.0 heads?
Old 10-13-2004, 06:34 AM
  #12  
Shorty Director
iTrader: (1)
 
VINCE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Valrico, Florida
Posts: 8,260
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I see so many guesses.. I have had all heads but LS6. The LS6 heads are still the top dawg. They actually shine better than the 6.0L heads from .500 lift on up. The 6.0L heads shine no matter what, but a good head porter will get more .500 lift flow out of a LS6 head than a 6.0L head. The 5.3L and regular 5.7L heads are still good heads, but they take more work to get close to the flow #'s of the LS6/6.0L heads. Another thing.. Dont get caught up in the flow #'s race. You can have a head flow 350cfm by .600 lift and put out some crazy dyno #'s on a unloaded dyno, but on the street or at the track the heads could run no better than a head that flows 290cfm. There is more to the equation than just peak flow #'s. Go with a proven combo/vendor and take the guessing out of the equation.
Old 10-13-2004, 09:49 AM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
MUSTANGEATER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Belleville, IL
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by VINCE
I see so many guesses.. I have had all heads but LS6. The LS6 heads are still the top dawg. They actually shine better than the 6.0L heads from .500 lift on up. The 6.0L heads shine no matter what, but a good head porter will get more .500 lift flow out of a LS6 head than a 6.0L head. The 5.3L and regular 5.7L heads are still good heads, but they take more work to get close to the flow #'s of the LS6/6.0L heads. Another thing.. Dont get caught up in the flow #'s race. You can have a head flow 350cfm by .600 lift and put out some crazy dyno #'s on a unloaded dyno, but on the street or at the track the heads could run no better than a head that flows 290cfm. There is more to the equation than just peak flow #'s. Go with a proven combo/vendor and take the guessing out of the equation.
Vince,

What did your heads end up flowing? I spoke with Larry Meaux on the phone the other day and I'm having difficulty deciding on what Head casting to go with.


Thanks

Floyd
Old 10-13-2004, 11:46 AM
  #14  
Shorty Director
iTrader: (1)
 
VINCE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Valrico, Florida
Posts: 8,260
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MUSTANGEATER
Vince,

What did your heads end up flowing? I spoke with Larry Meaux on the phone the other day and I'm having difficulty deciding on what Head casting to go with.


Thanks

Floyd
Actually my heads did not flow on par with what you see on this board, but I did have the highest dyno'ing hydraulic cammed F-body and I still hold that record. I now have the highest dyno'ing hydraulic cammed 408ci C5. Now, I have not taken my car to the track and I do not plan too, but my car not only put out the #'s, but I have raced many cars locally who have been to the track and I beat them. The cars I have raced trap 126mph plus.. Not only did I beat them, but I was walking away from them. Not only is my car fast, but I have guys refusing to race me unless they can use one or two power adders during the race. Larry Meaux can tell you what my heads flowed if he wants, but I will tell you this. My heads flow all the way to .800 lift b4 dropping off. You ask what does that matter? It matters to me.. I am always trying out new cams with higher lifts
Old 10-13-2004, 11:53 AM
  #15  
On The Tree
 
Automag928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Slow....in Tampa
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by VINCE
I have had all heads but LS6.

Must be nice to be Vince...
Old 10-13-2004, 12:31 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
MUSTANGEATER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Belleville, IL
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by VINCE
Actually my heads did not flow on par with what you see on this board, but I did have the highest dyno'ing hydraulic cammed F-body and I still hold that record. I now have the highest dyno'ing hydraulic cammed 408ci C5. Now, I have not taken my car to the track and I do not plan too, but my car not only put out the #'s, but I have raced many cars locally who have been to the track and I beat them. The cars I have raced trap 126mph plus.. Not only did I beat them, but I was walking away from them. Not only is my car fast, but I have guys refusing to race me unless they can use one or two power adders during the race. Larry Meaux can tell you what my heads flowed if he wants, but I will tell you this. My heads flow all the way to .800 lift b4 dropping off. You ask what does that matter? It matters to me.. I am always trying out new cams with higher lifts
Awesome damn impressive you get what you pay for. Now to pick a casting lol
Old 10-13-2004, 01:48 PM
  #17  
Shorty Director
iTrader: (1)
 
VINCE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Valrico, Florida
Posts: 8,260
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MUSTANGEATER
Awesome damn impressive you get what you pay for. Now to pick a casting lol
The FMS/Meaux combination is brutal. Not to swing from their nuts, but they told me not to worry after I saw the head flow #'s. I came home and dyno'd within 3rwhp of my pull at FMS on pump gas. No cool down. Just 3 quick pulls in 76 percent humidity and only up to 6500rpm. My next dyno is going to be on a good day with both cutouts open this time. Also, this dyno was done on a Mustang Dyno with Dynojet software to show dynojet #'s. There was a slight load on the car My friends are hammering me to put the spray on. I might do it just to post some #'s one day
Old 10-13-2004, 01:54 PM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
MUSTANGEATER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Belleville, IL
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

The spray is the way man. I'm really impressed with your car.
Old 10-13-2004, 02:04 PM
  #19  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
cyphur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North Texas
Posts: 8,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by VINCE
There is more to the equation than just peak flow #'s. Go with a proven combo/vendor and take the guessing out of the equation.


Can't beat good advice, I couldn't agree more. Performance is the bottom line....numbers are just a reference tool. Vince, your car f'in owns. Yes, I'll have to agree...it must be nice to be you
Old 10-13-2004, 04:03 PM
  #20  
TECH Apprentice
 
Next Phase's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ohio, north carolina
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by cyphur_traq
i'm savin for stg 2 ls6 heads....just tryin to find some cheap cores

5.3's raise your compression a lil bit, 6.0L's drop them. LS6's bump a tad but not much. Where the LS6 heads really shine is under the curve....thats where you'll see the biggest gains over the other heads. But as JRP pointed out, you'll pay for them.
Hey bro,

Been reading the thread....are you looking for cheap cores? I just swapped out my LS-1 heads for GTP Stage 1 heads......

If you need LS-6 heads, can't help. If you need LS-1 heads,mine are sittin' in my garage colecting dust....maybe we can work something out?

shoot me an e-mail Nextphasemarko@aol.com

-Marko




Quick Reply: Which Heads Are Better: Ls6, 5.3, Or 6.0



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:12 PM.