With heads.. is it true that...
What would you guys reccomend for me. I want stage 2 heads.
Thanks
<strong> 3 letters TEA </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">4 letters-Jeff <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
Does anybody have any feedback on my initial question about the smaller valves?
Thanks
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
"Stage 2" is a term that is only applicable from one set of heads to another WITHIN one manufacturer. One Co's Stage 2 may have 2.02 x 1.57 valves, anothers may have 2.055 (or bigger) x 1.60.
Cartek had a story in GMHTP awhile back where they were running close to 10's w/ 2.02 x 1.57 heads.
<strong> Is MTI and GTP putting up good track times with the stock 346? Would a set up like Absolute Speed have better track times than MTI, GTP? What about track times for TEA? </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I'm glad you brought this up. So much of the information out there is just flow numbers. Dyno numbers are a little better, but track numbers would really be helpful (keeping all the variables in perspective).
<strong> Big bores allow for more relief in chamber around bigger valves to allow more flow with them.Port design and size has way more to do with velocity into cylinder than valve sizes do. You really cant overvalve a cylinder, but you can definitely over Size port and hurt performance. I have shifted heads around on flow bench bore and it doesnt have the dramatic effect on port flow that people think it would. FWIW </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">P.S. Oh and thanks Don!


