Trying to decide ... heads vs all else ????
1. Stall converter, LT's, 100 HP dry shot (with injector and fuel pump upgrade)
2. Stage 2 heads to compliment my TR220/220 .551/.551 112 cam kit?
My particular application is for the street and some occasional fun at the dragstrip. My car will probably never see a larger cam. I don't want to lose much streetability and I don't care much about emissions testing.
Last edited by JEB99TA; Nov 7, 2004 at 08:41 AM. Reason: Missing info
.between ur choices ill suggest the TQ with the 100 shot ... why not the head choice, because it is hard to spend the headS money with ur current cam .. u should try the stage 2E head and the x1 cam comobo from MTI they work perfect , with good streetability ... anyways ur current cam has a 112 LSA which got little rough ideal .
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
likely go, too. Name-calling aside, point is that it's
just barely going to top out your LS1 heads and
no need to go super-size. Certainly better bargains
than "Stage 2 anything" if you intend to stay at
that plateau. Converter will pay off every day,
around town; headers too. I think in this case
heads really only would show when you are WOT.
your cam is fine, it fits your application as i remember what you were looking for when you first started your cam research.
with "stg2" heads and your ls6 intake your engine will only see about ~275cfm @.600 asumming there a good set. your 220 can take full advantage of that.
yep....it's a b*tch cam.....
(j/k)that cam is fine if thats what you want.......I (and most people) just want more lope and stuff.......
I would go with a TQ and then LT headers before I did a set of heads (if I had your car)........

I bet it really jumped up with the LS6 manifold and a ported TB helps on anything. Heads will do a good bit also but not without the LTs as you can't get the exhaust out.
As for the shporties vs LT's, I still believe that shorties will scavenge just a little better down low than the LT's. I've done a lot of research on the issue and the dyno's show 2-3 lbs RWTQ down low ... to improve 0-60' times over LT's. Of course the LT's quickly make tremendously more RWHP/RWTQ mid-to-high end. As stated before, the '99 year models make ****-for-power compared to the '00-'02 cars, so, I wouldn't have even wasted time with the JBA shorties if I had a 00'-02' car. The very small gain would not have been worth it.
midrange torque; long tubes and mids get closer
at the higher RPM where it all just about the
pipes' raw flow but tuned LTs bring you up, over
more of the RPM range. Couple this with a
converter, and "what's low end?" - you will be
up out of the mud into the fat part of the torque
curve, at any throttle at all.





