ASA Soundclip
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Dan:
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Slowhawk:
<strong> Ok,I just read this whole thread.The Cam does sound real good,but where are the dyno and track times <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" /> I personally would not want a Cam that lopes like that if it can't back it up.So let's see some performance gains <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I'm guessing that with its increased duration this cam make about 360-380 rwhp with ported stock or S1 heads. Am I guessing or hoping? I hope i'm guessing because I want more hp out of this cam before I think of getting it.
Dan <img border="0" title="" alt="[Cool]" src="gr_images/icons/cool.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">If your main goal is HP then go with one of the proven bigger cams. The main reason I personaly want this cam is I should make about 380 Hp with out having to change springs on a regular baisis. My main goal is not drag racing etheir. It should make killer power under the curve and with a set of 4.10 gears it will be an awsome Street car in a M6; and great on a roadrace track <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> . Remember GM built this cam for roadracing on stock heads. So if you want the most HP go with one of the huge cams with a big lift. I just sold my TR230 because for me the extra 15 to 20 hp is not worth me stressing on my springs going south. So basicaly I think if the rest of the car is set up right it will back it up. But on the drag strip there are much better cams.
As far as actual dyno #'s I will be posting what I put hopefully next month with QTP headers and mods below. If I have anywhere between 370 and 390 I will be pleased. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Then I wouldn't mind using this cam for patrol then. Most of my driving is in the city anyway and this cam would do wonders there. Right now with the cam I have now, most of my power is at top with some mid-range. Great for getting me twelves at the track all day long.
Dan
rtss, do you think its worth the jump from .525 to .572 with the rockers on stock heads.
Dan
About 45 minutes to an hour was the limit in this vehicle. After exiting vehicle, I'd be vibrating for about thirty minutes and needed to let the ol' nervous system idle back to normal. Despite this, it was always exciting to contemplate the next "ride".
One major advantage with today's computer fuel management is the greatly increased mileage. A side by side mileage comparison is making me reconsider a cam of this type. Hmmm, let's see...carb maximum mpg is 6-10. EFI mpg might be anywhere from 12-24.
Have fun, everyone!!!
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Not Found
The requested URL /~chutchin/ls1/ASAatIDLE.wav was not found on this server.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache/1.3.27 Server at www-scf.usc.edu Port 80

Please help! I want to hear this thing!!!

Bada$$, btw!
That **** is bad ***! I think I'd like to have that sound with a reverse split cam! Could this be done with stock pistons and non-milled heads? Big duration, mild lift, with a 110° LSA with a 108° IC (2° advance ground in). How big can we go with duration and mild lift (i.e. .558" max)??
That just sounds too damn nice
! 





