Coolant leak! MTI 427
#41
Originally Posted by 2001 Pewter WS6
This is what happens when everyone tries to keep their problems hush hush so that the vendor will take care of them. It is a shame. I know of a few people who got burnt bad over sleeved motors from MTI and Morgan Motorsports. Hopefully people will search these posts and do their homework better before making the same mistake. The problem is more common that what you read...
Last edited by 93Polo; 02-24-2005 at 06:49 PM.
#42
Thread Starter
6 Second Club Moderator
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
From: Lombard .IL
Originally Posted by 2001 Pewter WS6
This is what happens when everyone tries to keep their problems hush hush so that the vendor will take care of them. It is a shame. I know of a few people who got burnt bad over sleeved motors from MTI and Morgan Motorsports. Hopefully people will search these posts and do their homework better before making the same mistake. The problem is more common that what you read...
#43
Alot of justification for a C5R block can come from incidentals. Lets assume that MTI will honor their warrantee on whatever shortblock you buy from them. *IF* you dont live in TX, the cost of either paying to R&R the engine or ship the car back/forth to MTI can become significant. I had a dry sleeve motor which was replaced on warrantee with a wet sleeve motor for the cost of the sleeves. If you add the price of the original dry sleeve block, plus the core, plus the wet sleeves, plus the tranportation of the car back/forth to TX... I should have gone for a C5R block instead. Would I go to MTI again? Sure. I would have bought a C5R block in the first place though. I only have 700 miles on the current engine, but its using oil in huge amounts (I think one of the heads is cracked...not an MTI issue). I cannot exactly sleep soundly at night as if I had a C5R block. Was I told that the Wet-sleeve process was a perfect science? Sadly I was. But then again I was told the dry sleeve process had been worked out too. I'm going to learn one of these days. Either way, I don't have many miles on the car :-/ and I'd really LIKE to move to a 4" stroke. Wisely, I went all-bore thinking that the block/sleeving process could be trouble, and I wanted to get it sorted out before moving to the bigger stroke. I also don't need to spend the big $$$ on Lunati billet stuff, and last time I checked, it was all MTI installed.
One of the issues at play here is that MTI has been very good to most of us, even if there have been sleeve problems. MTI rescued me from ARE back when Jeff was the shop foreman, and I was ready to kiss their feet. I have had nothing but fantastic dealings with them on every aspect of the engine, though I almost *always* have to talk directly to Jayson for the whole/real scoop. Rick (the newer foreman) has treated me very well too, and I while I was told that these sleeved motors are very reliable, I have always had reason to doubt it. I did not go blindly.
If MTI would only admit to their loyal customers that the process is not perfect yet, we would probably still go for it... albeit knowing the risks. I suspect that they have always felt that the perfect process is the one they are just now using... I was once an engineer of consumer items as well. Its easy to believe you're just turning the corner.
As a consumer however, I am far more afraid of what I don't know than what I do.
MTI continues to fix problems of mine that werent necessarily their making, and in every other aspect, especially cost, they have exceeded my expectations. I understand that Steve at Race Engineering is the inventor and offers the blocks, etc. However, I am a loyal customer of MTI's. But I should be honest with my friends and admit that the sleeve process has not been easy or straight forward. Go... but go knowing.
One of the issues at play here is that MTI has been very good to most of us, even if there have been sleeve problems. MTI rescued me from ARE back when Jeff was the shop foreman, and I was ready to kiss their feet. I have had nothing but fantastic dealings with them on every aspect of the engine, though I almost *always* have to talk directly to Jayson for the whole/real scoop. Rick (the newer foreman) has treated me very well too, and I while I was told that these sleeved motors are very reliable, I have always had reason to doubt it. I did not go blindly.
If MTI would only admit to their loyal customers that the process is not perfect yet, we would probably still go for it... albeit knowing the risks. I suspect that they have always felt that the perfect process is the one they are just now using... I was once an engineer of consumer items as well. Its easy to believe you're just turning the corner.
As a consumer however, I am far more afraid of what I don't know than what I do.
MTI continues to fix problems of mine that werent necessarily their making, and in every other aspect, especially cost, they have exceeded my expectations. I understand that Steve at Race Engineering is the inventor and offers the blocks, etc. However, I am a loyal customer of MTI's. But I should be honest with my friends and admit that the sleeve process has not been easy or straight forward. Go... but go knowing.
Last edited by Visceral; 02-24-2005 at 05:20 PM.
#44
Thread Starter
6 Second Club Moderator
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
From: Lombard .IL
Originally Posted by Visceral
Alot of justification for a C5R block can come from incidentals. Lets assume that MTI will honor their warrantee on whatever shortblock you buy from them. *IF* you dont live in TX, the cost of either paying to R&R the engine or ship the car back/forth to MTI can become significant. I had a dry sleeve motor which was replaced on warrantee with a wet sleeve motor for the cost of the sleeves. If you add the price of the original dry sleeve block, plus the core, plus the wet sleeves, plus the tranportation of the car back/forth to TX... I should have gone for a C5R block instead. Would I go to MTI again? Sure. I would have bought a C5R block in the first place though. I only have 700 miles on the current engine, but its using oil in huge amounts (I think one of the heads is cracked...not an MTI issue). I cannot exactly sleep soundly at night as if I had a C5R block. Was I told that the Wet-sleeve process was a perfect science? Sadly I was. But then again I was told the dry sleeve process had been worked out too. I'm going to learn one of these days. Either way, I don't have many miles on the car :-/ and I'd really LIKE to move to a 4" stroke. Wisely, I went all-bore thinking that the block/sleeving process could be trouble, and I wanted to get it sorted out before moving to the bigger stroke. I also don't need to spend the big $$$ on Lunati billet stuff, and last time I checked, it was all MTI installed.
One of the issues at play here is that MTI has been very good to most of us, even if there have been sleeve problems. MTI rescued me from ARE back when Jeff was the shop foreman, and I was ready to kiss their feet. I have had nothing but fantastic dealings with them on every aspect of the engine, though I almost *always* have to talk directly to Jayson for the whole/real scoop. Rick (the newer foreman) has treated me very well too, and I while I was told that these sleeved motors are very reliable, I have always had reason to doubt it. I did not go blindly.
If MTI would only admit to their loyal customers that the process is not perfect yet, we would probably still go for it... albeit knowing the risks. I suspect that they have always felt that the perfect process is the one they are just now using... I was once an engineer of consumer items as well. Its easy to believe you're just turning the corner.
As a consumer however, I am far more afraid of what I don't know than what I do.
MTI continues to fix problems of mine that werent necessarily their making, and in every other aspect, especially cost, they have exceeded my expectations. I understand that Steve at Race Engineering is the inventor and offers the blocks, etc. However, I am a loyal customer of MTI's. But I should be honest with my friends and admit that the sleeve process has not been easy or straight forward. Go... but go knowing.
One of the issues at play here is that MTI has been very good to most of us, even if there have been sleeve problems. MTI rescued me from ARE back when Jeff was the shop foreman, and I was ready to kiss their feet. I have had nothing but fantastic dealings with them on every aspect of the engine, though I almost *always* have to talk directly to Jayson for the whole/real scoop. Rick (the newer foreman) has treated me very well too, and I while I was told that these sleeved motors are very reliable, I have always had reason to doubt it. I did not go blindly.
If MTI would only admit to their loyal customers that the process is not perfect yet, we would probably still go for it... albeit knowing the risks. I suspect that they have always felt that the perfect process is the one they are just now using... I was once an engineer of consumer items as well. Its easy to believe you're just turning the corner.
As a consumer however, I am far more afraid of what I don't know than what I do.
MTI continues to fix problems of mine that werent necessarily their making, and in every other aspect, especially cost, they have exceeded my expectations. I understand that Steve at Race Engineering is the inventor and offers the blocks, etc. However, I am a loyal customer of MTI's. But I should be honest with my friends and admit that the sleeve process has not been easy or straight forward. Go... but go knowing.
#45
Originally Posted by LASTLS1
Thats why I started this thread. At this point I want nothing from MTI, free or not.
I have to assume from what your have written, their (MTI) customer service was not getting anything done? I had a bad experience with them also. I gave up, after they got my money they would not give me the time of day. I tried to warn a few others and the MTI cheer-leaders beat me down with the "it was all your fault crap"....
Oh well.... Thanks for not playing the silent save my ego game and letting the rest of us know.....
...good luck...
#48
Originally Posted by SideStepThanks for not playing the [U
silent save my ego game[/U] and letting the rest of us know.....
The reason people are slow to announce some kind of failure on this board (or others) is the countless train of bull$hit bandwaggoneers who love to come in and bash any vendor they don't use. If you want to talk about ego, those are the folks who are puffing their chests because they were "smart enough" not to use said vendor. Pretty soon you have 75 posts of people saying how crap a vendor is, of whom one has an issue, three have bought intake lids, and 71 don't know WTF they are posting about.
Appreciate that those of us who have been around here far longer than most (all the way back to F-body IRC chat rooms in the 90's) know well how out-of-hand a "problem" post can get if not properly bracketed, prefaced, and footnoted. Given then that such a post can be tantamount to starting a war, most of us have learned that we can get our problems dealt with far more quickly, effectively, and cheaply with diplomacy.
#49
Originally Posted by LASTLS1
I can't understand that at all. It almost seems like they are giving up on a hopeless cause. Anyways, good luck to you.
#50
Originally Posted by 1QWIKZ
a darton block is NOT stronger than a c5r...as stated by the Colonel on a previous thread.
#51
Originally Posted by LASTLS1
Has anyone else had any problems with their sleeved block? The first one dropped a sleeve (dry sleeve). Second one cracked the sleeve at the top of the cylinder. (dry sleeve). MTI gave me a new Darton wet sleeve block. This one has coolant leaking ALSO! Difference in the sleeve and the block is .003. Just enough to leak coolant when hot. Seems as the deck was not serfaced properly. I'm getting pretty tired of pulling the motor. Not to mention the car being down for most of last summer! Am I the only one having problems? Less than 1000 miles on the engine NO NITROUS! I'm so scared to put nitrous to this paper shortblock. I'm thinking a 402 iron block would have been a better choice. MTI gave sugestions on how (I) should repair the block or they said I should upgrade to a C5R? I didn't know you needed a C5R shortblock just to hold coolant. Anyways, has anyone else had any problems?
sounds like the block was fucked up (Wets don't usually leak).......I have almost 5K on mine and there are tons of people with 15K+ without any problems.....
in short....yes.....your the first person I know of with this problem....
#52
Originally Posted by LASTLS1
Has anyone else had any problems with their sleeved block? The first one dropped a sleeve (dry sleeve). Second one cracked the sleeve at the top of the cylinder. (dry sleeve). MTI gave me a new Darton wet sleeve block. This one has coolant leaking ALSO! Difference in the sleeve and the block is .003. Just enough to leak coolant when hot. Seems as the deck was not serfaced properly. I'm getting pretty tired of pulling the motor. Not to mention the car being down for most of last summer! Am I the only one having problems? Less than 1000 miles on the engine NO NITROUS! I'm so scared to put nitrous to this paper shortblock. I'm thinking a 402 iron block would have been a better choice. MTI gave sugestions on how (I) should repair the block or they said I should upgrade to a C5R? I didn't know you needed a C5R shortblock just to hold coolant. Anyways, has anyone else had any problems?
#53
Originally Posted by LASTLS1
Yes, they were. Even so how would that explain the sleeve being .003 higher that the block? And only on one sleeve.
didn't catch that part.......thats something shifted in the block (not the sleeve's fault).......
#54
Originally Posted by 383ss
are you kidding me?? have you done a search? or maybe all the threads have been deleted... 6 of 7 local MTI sleeved block I personally know of were defective. enough said.
I find that hard to believe... given how many they have made.
Most of us know about the dry sleeve issues... but even Steve at Race Eng. only knows of a few Dartons that havent worked out... MTI or not.
#55
Originally Posted by 1QWIKZ
a darton block is NOT stronger than a c5r...as stated by the Colonel on a previous thread.
#58
This is all like arguing if Superman is stronger than Spiderman. I don't know anyone here that is capable of max'ing out either block design, properly installed.
I'd be happy to let this thread turn into that discussion, since I bet LASTLS1 and David Coates will work something out.
But in Ferris's words;
"The Europeans could be Fascist Anarchists... it still doesnt change the fact that I don't own a car."
I'd be happy to let this thread turn into that discussion, since I bet LASTLS1 and David Coates will work something out.
But in Ferris's words;
"The Europeans could be Fascist Anarchists... it still doesnt change the fact that I don't own a car."
#59
Thread Starter
6 Second Club Moderator
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
From: Lombard .IL
Originally Posted by poolfanatic
LASTLS1,
Please check your e-mail and get back to me if you would. Am trying to clarify a few things in the hope that I can help.
David Coates
MTI
Houston, TX
Please check your e-mail and get back to me if you would. Am trying to clarify a few things in the hope that I can help.
David Coates
MTI
Houston, TX