G5X-2 cam & head Dyno Numbers
-Jason
<strong> FYI, all M6 LS1's have a stock aluminum driveshaft <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Tell that to the guys whose 01 6-speed cars came with the H-rated tires and a STEEL driveshaft from the factory. We beat this horse to death in the computer forum a while back...
https://ls1tech.com/ubb/cgi-bin/ulti...;f=23;t=002775
-Andrew
460rwhp is very feasable w/ ls6 heads/cam and a stock rear end and 11.5+:1 compression......
I'm sure my car, Justin's and many others would put out similar numbers with LS6 heads, high compression, and a stock rear end.
<strong> Verbs,
He's running 4.10's and also with a less than optimal A/F ratio. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I wasn't referring to gear ratio, I was asking if he had a 10 bolt instead of a 12bolt/9"
<strong> FYI, all M6 LS1's have a stock aluminum driveshaft <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Wrong dude. Mine came with a steel driveshaft. 2001 M6 LS1 Z28.
i like many are not going to drive 2k miles to have unknown parts put in my car
when i can do the install
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Are you saying that even with identical gearing (4.10's) that just the mere fact it's a 12 bolt vs. the stock 10 bolt it would change the HP output that much? I wouldn't think the differences would make that much of an impact on the final #'s.
<strong> Verbs,
Are you saying that even with identical gearing (4.10's) that just the mere fact it's a 12 bolt vs. the stock 10 bolt it would change the HP output that much? I wouldn't think the differences would make that much of an impact on the final #'s. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">As a matter of fact, yes. I lost about 10hp horsepower going from 4.10s in a 10 bolt to 3.73's in a 33 spline 12 bolt.
The axles are thicker and heavier, and so is the posi unit/gears. More rotating mass= less power to the ground.
What I was getting at in general, is that a bunch of little things can add up and make for a good dyno run. LS6 heads, a high 11.5+ compression ratio, a stock 10 bolt, dynoing through an open y-pipe, etc. all add up and make for good dyno #'s.
Not knowing the full details of what mods the car has makes it hard to pass judgment as to whether this is the ultimate kick *** cam, or just a really good cam with a fairly optimal setup.
I will not buy a cam without knowing the specs.
When Someone cam doctors it let me know.
Lou- if you would like to sponsor the first
'cam only' 10 second M6,let me know.
I could sell a few cams for you. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
e-mail-minushuman@iwon.com
I don't care about dyno #'s,I care about ET.
...but there is a direct link between the 2. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
<strong> Lou said it was a normal split so there can only be a couple of choices.
220/226
224/230
228/234
230/236
232/238
Phillip </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Great deductive reasoning <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
Unfortunately those cam specs don't tell us ****. The lobe profile, opening and closing points of the intake valve, lobe separation etc are all extremely important and not covered with those pair of cam spec numbers above...
Would you mind sharing the the calculated CR?
The dyno is impressive. Thanks for the graph.
So the ASSumption thing still holds true <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
Is the cam too big for a stock compression car?
Thanks
Jason
Now, that was not Cartek themselves (Julio, etc..), just their customers. Anytime anyone posts a big number they are all over it. Now, brent's car has dyno around 450 with a 4.10 gear. So, he is figuring his car will dyno 463 or so with 3.42s. Yes, Cartek IIx pkgs have run 10's in a C5.
I have yet to see the EXACT cam specs of a Cartek IIx pkg. They have been notoriously secret about what they are doing. I don't see anyone complaining.
As far as I am concerened all those guys can keep their numbers secret. They did the R&D, not you. Now, I would hope at some point the numbers from Cartek and others would come out, so we can add that information to all the other that is out there.
My reason, I want to have all the information possible, and I want to make the most HP with the fatest curve.
But, LGM did the research, and invested the time. It is no secret that stuff Lou has developed has been copied on several occasions.
I don't see any of the CNC shops handing out their data files on their cylinders heads so you can duplicate it at any shop you wish...
All I can say to you cry babies is grow up... Learn to understand what competition, and running your own business is all about.
To Lou and the rest of the crew @ LGM. Props to you guys... I look forward to a test of your pkg in a Z06 with your headers to shut up some of the others out there...
If you wanna have Louis get ahold of me on the indycamaro.com site we can make arrangments to put his car on my dynojet and have another 460+ rwhp dyno graph to post.
Darren





