233/239 Track Results
03-27-2005, 10:46 PM
#1
233/239 Track Results Here's my dyno results if anyone cares to see the graphs or anything
https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iii-internal-engine/280568-233-239-results-question.html
Car details:
2001 A4
Finish Line Performance LT Headers
3" X pipe w/ spintech twister muffs dumped
ASP Pulley
Home Ported Throttle Body
Whisper Lid
Smooth Bellow
TCI SSF 3500
3.73 Gears
Stock LS6 Intake
Stock Water Pump
Stock 241 Heads
Suspension:
BMR LCA's
BM Sway bar
Stock TA
Tuned by HPE
400.6 rwhp / 352.3 rwtq (locked)
381.6 rwhp / 322 rwtq (unlocked)
Stock trim (minus back seat) t-top car w/ full tank of gas and my 200 lb fat *** in it. (Read heavy)
Car was run at HRP (Houston) on Friday the 25th. Don't know what the DA was but the air felt pretty good to me.
60': 1.65
1/8 ET: 7.58
1/8 Trap: 90.28
1/4 ET:11.92
1/4 Trap: 113.6
Before cam I was 12.7 @ 108 w/ 2.0 60'.
Honestly I was expecting a little better (11.7 or so) but I'm not too disapointed. I realize I am pretty understalled and think I would gain 3 tenths at least by stepping up to a 4000+ stall. I'm still undecided if I'm going to stay NA though so I'm holding off on that. Trap speed seems a little slow too me but I'm not too concerned w/ that being it's an A4.
Guys w/ similar mods (especially similar cam) post up your NA quarter mile times and let me know where I stand.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iii-internal-engine/280568-233-239-results-question.html
Car details:
2001 A4
Finish Line Performance LT Headers
3" X pipe w/ spintech twister muffs dumped
ASP Pulley
Home Ported Throttle Body
Whisper Lid
Smooth Bellow
TCI SSF 3500
3.73 Gears
Stock LS6 Intake
Stock Water Pump
Stock 241 Heads
Suspension:
BMR LCA's
BM Sway bar
Stock TA
Tuned by HPE
400.6 rwhp / 352.3 rwtq (locked)
381.6 rwhp / 322 rwtq (unlocked)
Stock trim (minus back seat) t-top car w/ full tank of gas and my 200 lb fat *** in it. (Read heavy)
Car was run at HRP (Houston) on Friday the 25th. Don't know what the DA was but the air felt pretty good to me.
60': 1.65
1/8 ET: 7.58
1/8 Trap: 90.28
1/4 ET:11.92
1/4 Trap: 113.6
Before cam I was 12.7 @ 108 w/ 2.0 60'.
Honestly I was expecting a little better (11.7 or so) but I'm not too disapointed. I realize I am pretty understalled and think I would gain 3 tenths at least by stepping up to a 4000+ stall. I'm still undecided if I'm going to stay NA though so I'm holding off on that. Trap speed seems a little slow too me but I'm not too concerned w/ that being it's an A4.
Guys w/ similar mods (especially similar cam) post up your NA quarter mile times and let me know where I stand.
Last edited by calongo_SS; 03-27-2005 at 11:20 PM.
03-27-2005, 11:39 PM
#2
11 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 930
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i had tunning isues causeing my car to fall on its face when it went into 2nd gear, but i still pulled a 12.2 at 111 mph, but that was on a 1.8 60 ft... i know it had WAY more in it though if i could have figured out the problem.. but i have the same cam, same stall, but stock 3:23 gears.. i just got my new heads put on last night and am planning on some 3:73's and a 4000-4200 stall.
03-28-2005, 03:02 PM
#4
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 6,368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you should be able to do that with just bolt ons and tuning. you should be trapping at least 116/117. a friend of mine makes the same power has a stealth cam, .581 lift i believe its a 224 square cam, has a yank 3600, and 2.73's and has gone as fast as 11.4 to give you a comparison.
03-28-2005, 03:09 PM
#6
TECH Addict
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, Fl. - Hurricane Highway
Posts: 2,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
sweet looking numbers i can;t wait to install my 233/239. yea that full tank of gas doesn't help but the numbers still look pretty sick, congrats.
Trending Topics
03-28-2005, 03:49 PM
#8
11 Second Club
That's interesting. My car is pretty close to that. Cam is 3-4* larger (MS3), no pulley, no LS6 intake, 3.23's, and stock suspension minus front sway bar. Everything else is pretty equal. Before the cam/TB I ran 12.6 @ 106.5 with a 1.73 60' on ET streets. What did you dyno before the cam? Was the recent dyno run made with the converter locked or unlocked?? I made 319/337 through unlocked stocker converter, and then 343/348 through unlocked SSF. I havn't ran since the cam, but hopefully will hopefully get a chance within the next week. I am hoping I run about what you did, 11.7-11.99, but I am really unsure what will really happen.
03-28-2005, 03:53 PM
#10
Originally Posted by blkZ28spt
That's interesting. My car is pretty close to that. Cam is 3-4* larger (MS3), no pulley, no LS6 intake, 3.23's, and stock suspension minus front sway bar. Everything else is pretty equal. Before the cam/TB I ran 12.6 @ 106.5 with a 1.73 60' on ET streets. What did you dyno before the cam? Was the recent dyno run made with the converter locked or unlocked?? I made 319/337 through unlocked stocker converter, and then 343/348 through unlocked SSF. I havn't ran since the cam, but hopefully will hopefully get a chance within the next week. I am hoping I run about what you did, 11.7-11.99, but I am really unsure what will really happen.
Before cam it was:
345/352 locked
325/338 unlocked (I think)
Both the locked and unlocked #'s with the cam are in the first post I think or definitley in the link to the dyno thread.
03-28-2005, 04:08 PM
#11
11 Second Club
Originally Posted by calongo_SS
Before cam it was:
345/352 locked
325/338 unlocked (I think)
Both the locked and unlocked #'s with the cam are in the first post I think or definitley in the link to the dyno thread.
345/352 locked
325/338 unlocked (I think)
Both the locked and unlocked #'s with the cam are in the first post I think or definitley in the link to the dyno thread.
That full gas tank is adding an easy 85 pounds. That is almost enough to give a tenth/mph gain.
03-28-2005, 04:47 PM
#12
On The Tree
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
theres something wrong there.
your 60' is .35 better now than before the cam.
yet you are .8 faster. given the same launch with your setup before the cam you would have been within a tenth or 2 of where you are now.
your 60' is .35 better now than before the cam.
yet you are .8 faster. given the same launch with your setup before the cam you would have been within a tenth or 2 of where you are now.
03-28-2005, 06:57 PM
#15
11 Second Club
Originally Posted by hugger1975
damn,
and i was thinkin i would be happy if i hit mid 12's.
guess i should expect better huh?
and how the heck are u guys runnin sub 1.6 sixty footers on a stock rear?
that scares me.
<----------cant wait till track day (april 9th)
and i was thinkin i would be happy if i hit mid 12's.
guess i should expect better huh?
and how the heck are u guys runnin sub 1.6 sixty footers on a stock rear?
that scares me.
<----------cant wait till track day (april 9th)
03-28-2005, 07:12 PM
#16
Originally Posted by blkZ28spt
I went low 1.7's before the cam, and plan to go a bit quicker than that now. With an automatic it's really not all that hard on the rear.
aghhhhh
ya, scares me a lil on the 6speed.
gotta watch those cammed stalled autos
hope i can break 1.8 w/out blowin somethin up.........lol
03-31-2005, 10:22 AM
#17
Originally Posted by blkZ28spt
I went low 1.7's before the cam, and plan to go a bit quicker than that now. With an automatic it's really not all that hard on the rear.
Yeah I pull 1.72's on All season radials BFG KDWS. 1.47 on BFG Comp TA
Your times do seem low with that cam. maybe its your tune that you shifting out of you power band or dropping below it?
