Best low end torque cam for LS1..
Last edited by SSCoulter; May 30, 2005 at 08:50 AM.
I really think people are putting TOO much emphasis on the peak number so people are worried about the low end. The low end is there on the street. Perfectly drivable, and when you go WOT, it will scream. I won't ever forget the first time I took a G5X3 car out
I really think people are putting TOO much emphasis on the peak number so people are worried about the low end. The low end is there on the street. Perfectly drivable, and when you go WOT, it will scream. I won't ever forget the first time I took a G5X3 car out 

I think you guys are missing the whole point here.we are here to help out ALL that ask ???'s.and this guy wants to know of a cam that makes AWESOME TQ not "a little more than stock", and not "the low end is STILL there"...............he wants to make almost ALL of his power in torque, or in the low-mid range area.i think your original TR224 would be good cam;BUT i also agree w/ the guy who made the statement earlier about a 208/216 on a 108(something like that.thats sounds VERY similar to the cam i put in my 385 SBC.and it made phenominal low end power)i LOVE that kind of power also, just stab the pedal and INSTANT power! not waiting to rev it up and popppin it,or waiting for the powerband, just stab and go.i do a lot of the same driving you do....ive been looking at the G2 and the G5 from LG's site.they look VERY promising,lg's cams make very good power across the board,just look at a little bit smaller one..also like these guys say the futral cams make a LOT of TQ, without sacrificing a lil top end fun
call Alan at futral and tell him your situation and also call Lou at LG motorsports.both sponsors, very nice guys and more than willing to help you out on your road to victory and daily driving bliss.good luck and stay away from those cops.lol.
Last edited by '02SS; May 30, 2005 at 01:38 PM.
call Alan at futral and tell him your situation and also call Lou at LG motorsports.both sponsors, very nice guys and more than willing to help you out on your road to victory and daily driving bliss.good luck and stay away from those cops.lol. 
thunder racing
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
10.87 on a 150 shot dry (can do better with more suspension mod). can't wait till I get heads
and lighten some weight. 
Now, if their setups are basically teh same otherwise and the larger cam guy doesn't know that he is supposed to build a COMBO with his parts and loses, it might be funny.
Now, if their setups are basically teh same otherwise and the larger cam guy doesn't know that he is supposed to build a COMBO with his parts and loses, it might be funny.

ive seen guys get big cams then not wanna put on 4.11s or high stalls.
Of course, I am having my converter restalled to 4,000 as we speak. Gears aren't as important in A4's as they are in the M6's.
People don't always understand they need to support the big cams. Example: When I first put my MS3 in I was still running an LS1 intake manifold, 3.23's and a 3500 stall converter. Tranny wasn't in good shape and it ran 12.2. Now that I'm getting LS6 intake and 4k stall (plus fixed tranny and UD pulley) it should be down in the 11's where it belongs.
Last edited by blkZ28spt; May 31, 2005 at 12:05 AM.
The vast majority of the threads I read are all about pushing the upper limits of performance with bigger and bigger cams and you have to admit most big cams are designed to make power farther up the rpm range right? There is always a trade off as I have looked at so many dyno sheets that prove it. I'm not looking for "plenty" of torque, I want the most torque I can get down low where I use it most. Why would I pick a cam that trades low end for high end power when 99% of the time I will not be turning my motor to 7,000rpm's? If two cams cost the same and one makes more power down low wouldn't that be the cam for me? Most people measure performance at the track or by dyno numbers. All well a good for those folks, I want to measure performance by how big a smile it puts on my face when I mash the gas. If that comes in the form of a 242/248 615/615 lift bigazz cam then so be it. But my question still stands, what cam makes the most torque on the low to mid-range? I still don't have a complete answer to this question.
I will be using my stock heads and will be adding Mac's and a LS6 intake when I do the cam swap.






