Best low end torque cam for LS1..
#41
Pontiacerator
iTrader: (12)
The thing about the real world that's mostly ignored is that we don't drive around at full throttle all the time. People who are interested in low end are often talking about the responsiveness of the powertrain in part-throttle situations ... stuff we deal with every day driving. This is the kind of thing that will never show up on a dyno or at the track. But it is a huge part of having a satisfying DD. Experience with traditional Pontiacs tells me that there are cams that will give increases across the board ... the same has to be true for LS1's. I think that's what SS Coulter is looking for ... if I may be so bold to say.
#42
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: North Little Rock, Arkansas
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RevGTO
The thing about the real world that's mostly ignored is that we don't drive around at full throttle all the time. People who are interested in low end are often talking about the responsiveness of the powertrain in part-throttle situations ... stuff we deal with every day driving. This is the kind of thing that will never show up on a dyno or at the track. But it is a huge part of having a satisfying DD. Experience with traditional Pontiacs tells me that there are cams that will give increases across the board ... the same has to be true for LS1's. I think that's what SS Coulter is looking for ... if I may be so bold to say.
Originally Posted by Patrick G
You may want to look at a cam like the Ausies's run: Keep the intake duration on the shorter side and run a much narrower LSA. Maybe something like 216/220 108LSA (+0). This would make OMG cylinder pressure and big block torque down low and pull nicely to 6000 rpm. The Ausie's are much further along with low-end torque cam development IMO.
Last edited by SSCoulter; 05-30-2005 at 08:50 AM.
#43
It's not mine! woo hoo!
iTrader: (7)
I guess all I have to say then is drive a big cam car and then you're opinion will change I really think people are putting TOO much emphasis on the peak number so people are worried about the low end. The low end is there on the street. Perfectly drivable, and when you go WOT, it will scream. I won't ever forget the first time I took a G5X3 car out
#44
11 Second Club
Originally Posted by DMNSPD
I guess all I have to say then is drive a big cam car and then you're opinion will change I really think people are putting TOO much emphasis on the peak number so people are worried about the low end. The low end is there on the street. Perfectly drivable, and when you go WOT, it will scream. I won't ever forget the first time I took a G5X3 car out
#45
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: South Bay,CA
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by blkZ28spt
I think you guys are missing the whole point here.we are here to help out ALL that ask ???'s.and this guy wants to know of a cam that makes AWESOME TQ not "a little more than stock", and not "the low end is STILL there"...............he wants to make almost ALL of his power in torque, or in the low-mid range area.i think your original TR224 would be good cam;BUT i also agree w/ the guy who made the statement earlier about a 208/216 on a 108(something like that.thats sounds VERY similar to the cam i put in my 385 SBC.and it made phenominal low end power)i LOVE that kind of power also, just stab the pedal and INSTANT power! not waiting to rev it up and popppin it,or waiting for the powerband, just stab and go.i do a lot of the same driving you do....ive been looking at the G2 and the G5 from LG's site.they look VERY promising,lg's cams make very good power across the board,just look at a little bit smaller one..also like these guys say the futral cams make a LOT of TQ, without sacrificing a lil top end fun call Alan at futral and tell him your situation and also call Lou at LG motorsports.both sponsors, very nice guys and more than willing to help you out on your road to victory and daily driving bliss.good luck and stay away from those cops.lol.
Last edited by '02SS; 05-30-2005 at 01:38 PM.
#46
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: North Little Rock, Arkansas
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by '02SS
I think you guys are missing the whole point here.we are here to help out ALL that ask ???'s.and this guy wants to know of a cam that makes AWESOME TQ not "a little more than stock", and not "the low end is STILL there"...............he wants to make almost ALL of his power in torque, or in the low-mid range area.i think your original TR224 would be aggod cam;BUT i also agree w/ the guy who made the statement earlier about a 208/216 on a 108(something like that.thats sounds VERY similar to the cam i put in my 385 SBC.and it made phenominal low end power.i LOVE that kind of power also, just stab the pedal and INSTANT power! not waiting to rev it up and popppin it,or waiting for the powerband, just stab and go.i do a lot of the same driving you do....ive been looking at the g5, and g5x2 from g2's site.they look VERY promising,lg's cams make very good power across the board,just look at a little bit smaller one..also like these guys say the futral cams make a LOT of TQ, without sacrificing a lil top end fun call Alan at futral and tell him your situation and also call Lou at LG motorsports.both sponsors, very nice guys and more than willing to help you out on your road to victory and daily driving bliss.good luck and stay away from those cops.lol.
#47
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: cyberspace
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RevGTO
Funny how so many guys on this site can't help but recommend "big" and can't stay away from talking peak hp. I'm interested in the same thing as you are. Besides the Vinci cams which have been mentioned, I would look at the TR "old Man" cam, their new CheaTR cam (especially with stock manifolds) and the Comp 216/200.
#48
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: South Bay,CA
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
theres also a comp cam on thunder's site that might fit your needs.its a 216/230 on a 112.check it out.
thunder racing
thunder racing
#49
TECH Senior Member
Originally Posted by 4mula
its funny when guys with so called mild cams beat up on guys with big cams at the track.
10.87 on a 150 shot dry (can do better with more suspension mod). can't wait till I get heads and lighten some weight.
#50
11 Second Club
Originally Posted by 4mula
its funny when guys with so called mild cams beat up on guys with big cams at the track.
Now, if their setups are basically teh same otherwise and the larger cam guy doesn't know that he is supposed to build a COMBO with his parts and loses, it might be funny.
#51
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: cyberspace
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by blkZ28spt
Now, if their setups are basically teh same otherwise and the larger cam guy doesn't know that he is supposed to build a COMBO with his parts and loses, it might be funny.
ive seen guys get big cams then not wanna put on 4.11s or high stalls.
#53
11 Second Club
I'm running the MS3 with 3.23's.
Of course, I am having my converter restalled to 4,000 as we speak. Gears aren't as important in A4's as they are in the M6's.
People don't always understand they need to support the big cams. Example: When I first put my MS3 in I was still running an LS1 intake manifold, 3.23's and a 3500 stall converter. Tranny wasn't in good shape and it ran 12.2. Now that I'm getting LS6 intake and 4k stall (plus fixed tranny and UD pulley) it should be down in the 11's where it belongs.
Of course, I am having my converter restalled to 4,000 as we speak. Gears aren't as important in A4's as they are in the M6's.
People don't always understand they need to support the big cams. Example: When I first put my MS3 in I was still running an LS1 intake manifold, 3.23's and a 3500 stall converter. Tranny wasn't in good shape and it ran 12.2. Now that I'm getting LS6 intake and 4k stall (plus fixed tranny and UD pulley) it should be down in the 11's where it belongs.
Last edited by blkZ28spt; 05-31-2005 at 12:05 AM.
#58
12 Second Club
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have to agree with the BIG Cam guys. I have a DD with a T-Rex and stock 3.42 gears (saving money for 12-bolt). My car is great around town, it has plenty of torque all the way up the rpms. The only reason I have bigger HP numbers is because my big cam can hold the tq higher into the rpms (hp=(tq x rpm)/5252). You keep saying you want driveable tq, but with 4.10's you will have great tq and all the power you want when you want it. Like previously qouted, go drive a BIG Cam car before you discount its daily driveability and response. Besides that, about any cam is better than stock!!!! So you have nothing to lose.
#59
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: North Little Rock, Arkansas
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by never2fast
I have to agree with the BIG Cam guys. I have a DD with a T-Rex and stock 3.42 gears (saving money for 12-bolt). My car is great around town, it has plenty of torque all the way up the rpms. The only reason I have bigger HP numbers is because my big cam can hold the tq higher into the rpms (hp=(tq x rpm)/5252). You keep saying you want driveable tq, but with 4.10's you will have great tq and all the power you want when you want it. Like previously qouted, go drive a BIG Cam car before you discount its daily driveability and response. Besides that, about any cam is better than stock!!!! So you have nothing to lose.
The vast majority of the threads I read are all about pushing the upper limits of performance with bigger and bigger cams and you have to admit most big cams are designed to make power farther up the rpm range right? There is always a trade off as I have looked at so many dyno sheets that prove it. I'm not looking for "plenty" of torque, I want the most torque I can get down low where I use it most. Why would I pick a cam that trades low end for high end power when 99% of the time I will not be turning my motor to 7,000rpm's? If two cams cost the same and one makes more power down low wouldn't that be the cam for me? Most people measure performance at the track or by dyno numbers. All well a good for those folks, I want to measure performance by how big a smile it puts on my face when I mash the gas. If that comes in the form of a 242/248 615/615 lift bigazz cam then so be it. But my question still stands, what cam makes the most torque on the low to mid-range? I still don't have a complete answer to this question.
I will be using my stock heads and will be adding Mac's and a LS6 intake when I do the cam swap.