Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

mild cam w/stock stall doable?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-15-2005, 02:44 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
dubrado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: texas
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default mild cam w/stock stall doable?

http://www.ls1gto.com/forums/showthr...819#post477819

Originally Posted by Playdough
Just picked up our GTO from my buddies shop, only thing done was a cam, 921 springs, and pushrod swap, nothing else. Car for now still has a stock stall, and no tuning. The cam in question is a 228/228 .588/.588 112+4. Its a Comp XE-R grind. Car still has stock tuning with the idle played with just a little, but it still idles at 500 RPM. Pretty choppy and lopey down there.

Driveablity...The car drives very well for the cam size with no stall. Rolling up to a stop it finds its idle ok, but with tuning that will come easily... At the stop light you can let it idle, but its very choppy which is to expected, but not bad IMO. Driving can't even tell the cam is there. It pulls away from a stop very easily and is very easy to drive. Little to no surge, only experienced it one time and never again. Haven't had a chance to really swing it up through the rev range yet, wanting to get the 921's broken in good....

Overall, I would say its not bad at all, for a 228, 112 cam with no tuning in an A4. It should be tuned in about 2 weeks when he gets a new version of Tuner Cat OBD2. Also I just closed a deal on a PI VIG 3600. So I will report back with findings of those changes to the car....

:thumbs: :burnout:

is this really doable...I'd like to put a TR224 in and run w/no stall for a few months if it's doable.
Old 07-15-2005, 03:28 PM
  #2  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (28)
 
jmm98LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: KS
Posts: 3,975
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Right now I'm running the gmpp ASA cam (226/236, .525/.525 110 lsa) with the stock stall converter. I'll tell you this.....it's not ANYWHERE near as bad as everybody here says. Running on the stock '98 tune it ran absolutely fine, but it would try to stall out when coming to a stop so I had to "two foot it" a little. I drove it for a month on the stock tune. Now that I've tuned it with HPT, I've got it idling at 700rpm in gear and it runs freaking awesome....hasn't even come close to stalling out. I can be in gear at a stop light with the a/c on high and both radiator fans running with no problem at all---and it hits sooooo hard .

Now even with a 700rpm idle, you will be pushing harder on the brakes while stopped in gear--but it's just barely more pressure than stock.
With that said, you will want to put a converter in eventually. A 3000 (or higher) stall will wake that cam up big time. With the stock stall, my car is nowhere near a dog in the lower rpms....I actually don't think it's that far from stock. However I know my car would be a ton faster with a big converter. The only reason I haven't done it is I think I'm swapping to t56 pretty soon. Enough rambling....my advice--freaking do it!
Old 07-15-2005, 03:37 PM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
dubrado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: texas
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

any surging or stalling out when coming to ubrupt stops and etc...?

HOw is it from a stop when going wot or daily driving?
Old 07-15-2005, 03:51 PM
  #4  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (28)
 
jmm98LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: KS
Posts: 3,975
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Since I've tuned the car, it has not come close to stalling. I drive the car every day and the only thing I've noticed is there is a TINY TINY bit of surging at about 1600rpm under light load. My wife can't tell, but I'm extremely **** so I can feel it. I'm still fine tuning the car so it's easily fixable.
Old 07-15-2005, 03:59 PM
  #5  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (98)
 
99ssleeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

I wouldnt do a TR224 on a stock stall, personally.

It's so much easier to have it run right after a stall then to be surging and stalling with the stock converter in there.

My .02
Old 07-15-2005, 04:42 PM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Z28_Ninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: attleboro, massachusetts
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 99ssleeper
I wouldnt do a TR224 on a stock stall, personally.

It's so much easier to have it run right after a stall then to be surging and stalling with the stock converter in there.

My .02
i have a 224 cam with a 567 lift on a 112lsa with a stock converter and it is fine, very little surging if any at all most of the time. shifting from reverse to drive and what not is kinda stiff and it is a little bit harder on the brakes because the brakes are fighting the drivetrain (because of the tighter stock converter) but is okay once you get used to which takes a few days. i ahve been running mine like that since beggining of june.
Old 07-15-2005, 04:53 PM
  #7  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (28)
 
jmm98LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: KS
Posts: 3,975
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Z28_Ninja
i have a 224 cam with a 567 lift on a 112lsa with a stock converter and it is fine, very little surging if any at all most of the time. shifting from reverse to drive and what not is kinda stiff and it is a little bit harder on the brakes because the brakes are fighting the drivetrain (because of the tighter stock converter) but is okay once you get used to which takes a few days. i ahve been running mine like that since beggining of june.
^^^^what he said. mine's even on a 110 lsa and it's just fine...just as driveable as when it was stock.
Old 07-15-2005, 05:03 PM
  #8  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (98)
 
99ssleeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

IMO, you all need converters!!!


Old 07-15-2005, 05:28 PM
  #9  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
smask04C5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Winter Haven, Fl.
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

yes its doable. i have crane 216/224 .551 115 lsa with 1.8 rockers. tuned with vhp handheld, runs and idles fine. next mod is 62cc AFR 205 with tune and dyno, then finally a yank ss3200 or ss3600. heads are on their way
Old 07-15-2005, 05:38 PM
  #10  
11 Second Club
 
blkZ28spt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The South
Posts: 5,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

It's doable, but a total waste speaking from a performance standpoint.
Old 07-15-2005, 05:57 PM
  #11  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
dubrado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: texas
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by blkZ28spt
It's doable, but a total waste speaking from a performance standpoint.
why exactly?
Old 07-15-2005, 09:09 PM
  #12  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
smask04C5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Winter Haven, Fl.
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

dubrado, there are several cam profiles that will definately increase performance, but in order to realize the full potential of any h/c mod in an a4, converter is the single most important component
Old 07-16-2005, 05:34 AM
  #13  
Teching In
 
C5 Purple Haze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Davie Fla.
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dubrado
why exactly?
Because the stock T/C stalls at only 1600 RPM. Because of this it prevents you from instantly getting into the upper part of the power band (3500+ RPM) where your engine is producing serious power. With a high stall T/C (3500 for example) when you go WOT your engine instantly spools up to 3500+ RPM. Your engine does not have to lug up to 3500 RPM like it often has to with the stock T/C.

Plus a high stall T/C has higher shift extensions, that improve your acceleration once you leave the hole. Not to mention far superior performance from a roll.
Old 07-16-2005, 07:11 AM
  #14  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
dubrado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: texas
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

yes, but having a cam w/no stall is not a "total waste" as he had stated earlier.
Old 07-16-2005, 07:12 AM
  #15  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
dubrado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: texas
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I like to drag race, but in Austin, no one ever does...it's all about roll racing here apparently

so I'm seeing which will help me the most, the stall or cam, so I wanna do the cam if possible
Old 07-16-2005, 07:59 AM
  #16  
11 Second Club
 
XTrooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NE PA
Posts: 1,320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Believe me when I tell you, these fellas that are telling you they are "just fine" with 224 and larger cams in their stock converter cars are trying to convince themselves more than they are you that their mismatched setups are ok.

If you want to do things properly, get what you're paying for with the bigger cam, and not get pushed down the highway when you try to brake, do it right and put a higher stall torque converter in your car. Besides all that, between the two, you'll get more for your money performance-wise with a converter swap than any cam you'd put in your car, especially when that cam's potential is hobbled by the stock converter. Name one cam that you can shave .4-.5 seconds off your 1/4 mile ET with. If you can, you should run right out and buy it, but the fact is, you can't. That same .4-.5 second reduction can happen with any decent-sized converter and for that reason alone the best choice should be obvious.
Old 07-16-2005, 10:42 AM
  #17  
11 Second Club
 
blkZ28spt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The South
Posts: 5,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by dubrado
why exactly?
XTROOPER has it. You will get MUCH larger gains from a converter than a cam on a stock car, and better drivability. Would you buy AFR 205's (awsome heads) for car that had nothing but a lid and cat-back?
Old 07-16-2005, 11:16 AM
  #18  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
BriancWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: The Garage
Posts: 3,910
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Get a converter first. What's with people nowadays wanting to do things all backwards? Do some reading/searching and once you have actually learned more about these cars and the mods that work for them you will realize the importance of modding in the correct order/way. That being said I had a A4 with a stall in my last WS6, so I'm not just some M6er spewing off at the mouth.

Two choices here: listen to the veterans and get a converter, then go out and WAX these guys that have a stock stalled cam only car, or join there club and PRAY you don't meet up with someone that does it right!!
Old 07-16-2005, 02:26 PM
  #19  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (12)
 
1QuickT-A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yeah you can do it, but it doesnt make much sense. Get a 3500 stall or whatever size suits you best and then do a cam..



Quick Reply: mild cam w/stock stall doable?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:53 AM.