Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Why not just go 427?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-29-2005, 06:19 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
ovaltobowtie2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Why not just go 427?

Im about to begin a build and I see people contiplating all kinds of different cube possibilities. If you are going over 400, why not just go as much as you can?? People talking about 402,408,414 etc....Is there a reason why some of you guys arent going straight to the top and doing as much cube as possible?? Is it rod angle, clearance issues....what?
Old 07-29-2005, 06:25 PM
  #2  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (12)
 
1QuickT-A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Most of the people with 408's do not want to use the aluminum block with sleeves.. Cast iron blocks are stronger and cheaper to build. Look at how many people have had problems with cracked sleeves, leaking sleeves, sleeve installations, etc. You dont have to worry about any of that with a cast iron block..
Old 07-29-2005, 06:28 PM
  #3  
TECH Apprentice
 
mnc2886's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A 408 is much cheaper than a 427. It will also hold nitrous alot better. Besides, I've seen hydrolic roller 408's with 550+ hp and 520+ tq so, the numbers can be there. Check out VINCE. His 408 is bad ***. Futral seems to have found their specialty.
Old 07-29-2005, 06:31 PM
  #4  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
Demon SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Pewee Valley,Ky
Posts: 824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

one reason is cost also, I can build you a "budget" 408 shortblock for around $3800.00. a "budget" 427 shortblock will run about $5900
Old 07-29-2005, 06:33 PM
  #5  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Steve - Race Eng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Oceanside, Ca.
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 132 Likes on 39 Posts

Default 427

The new Darton LS2 dry sleeve solves the problems of previous dry sleeve installation failures. Bore will go from 4.125" to 4.160" max. Problem is the lack of used LS2 blocks. You must obtain a new core which must be stress relieved for best results. A lot of folks don't want to spend the grand or so for a new block. You do end up with a much better deal with the bigger bore because the larger bore helps unshroud the valves. Much lighter than the iron block as well.

Steve



Originally Posted by ovaltobowtie2
Im about to begin a build and I see people contiplating all kinds of different cube possibilities. If you are going over 400, why not just go as much as you can?? People talking about 402,408,414 etc....Is there a reason why some of you guys arent going straight to the top and doing as much cube as possible?? Is it rod angle, clearance issues....what?
__________________
Steve Demirjian
Race Engine Development
Oceanside, Ca.
760-630-0450
web: www.raceenginedevelopment.com/
e-mail: race-engine-development@***.net
Old 07-29-2005, 07:44 PM
  #6  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
ovaltobowtie2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default why

Why is a 427 more expensive? Bigger bore for more machining??? I thought the rotating assemblies were the same cost. Help me here. Sleeving??

I was going to use an LQ4 block.
Old 07-29-2005, 07:48 PM
  #7  
LS1 Tech Administrator
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,245
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ovaltobowtie2
I was going to use an LQ4 block.
The max you can bore an LQ4 block is .060" over, giving a 414 displacement.
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2022 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 S&B CAI, Corsa catback.
2023 Corvette 3LT Z51 soon to be modified.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.

Old 07-29-2005, 07:51 PM
  #8  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (12)
 
kossuth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: New Market, MD
Posts: 969
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

The 6.0 blocks generally don't have enough meat in them to allow you to bore them over enough to get to 427. They have to be sonically scanned and the cast shift inside most blocks is enough to limit them to 408. As for the resleeved aluminum blocks, they are sometimes problematic and expensive to build. You get one built right they are great, but if you have a problem with the sleeves alot of times you have to start over with a new block.
Old 07-29-2005, 08:17 PM
  #9  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
Demon SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Pewee Valley,Ky
Posts: 824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ovaltobowtie2
Why is a 427 more expensive? Bigger bore for more machining??? I thought the rotating assemblies were the same cost. Help me here. Sleeving??

I was going to use an LQ4 block.
the cost of the sleeving process is what pushes the cost up on the aluminum block.
you can do a 421ci iron block with a standard ironblock bored 4.030(.030 over) and use a 4.125" crank

4.030x4.030x.7854x4.125x8=421ci
Old 07-29-2005, 10:36 PM
  #10  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Beast96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

LS-1/6 aluminum blocks can only be bored .010" max. In order to get the large bore, you need to have the old sleeves removed and new larger sleeves installed. This is what they mean by sleeving. This process is fairly expensive. New sleeved blocks run anywhere from 2k to 4k depending on who does the work and what type of sleeve and machine work you get done. Steve@ race enginering, who posted above, is the co-inventor of the best sleeves avalible and really the only one I would trust to install my sleeves. Once you get the block, then the big cubes start to come out....
Old 07-29-2005, 10:50 PM
  #11  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 138 Likes on 115 Posts

Default

And I wouldn't recommend a 4.125" stroke, because of oiling problems and oversquare blocks don't like revving. A lot of people go iron block with a 4" stroke. The Eagle strokes are $1k cheaper than the Lunati or Callies, so the cheap blocks are coming in below $4k and they work well.

If you go with a Darton MID and go with an offset ground stock crank (3.71" or so and it's plenty strong) you can do 397 or 403 for about the same price as an iron block with a Callies or Lunati stroke. The difference is that it's undersquare, so it'll rev much better, and the 4.125 or 4.155" bore will allow more airflow at high rpms. Not to mention it's lighter than the iron block and makes similar torque and horsepower numbers with less displacement and generally less radical cams.
Old 07-30-2005, 06:49 AM
  #12  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
Demon SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Pewee Valley,Ky
Posts: 824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JakeFusion
And I wouldn't recommend a 4.125" stroke, because of oiling problems and oversquare blocks don't like revving. A lot of people go iron block with a 4" stroke. The Eagle strokes are $1k cheaper than the Lunati or Callies, so the cheap blocks are coming in below $4k and they work well.

If you go with a Darton MID and go with an offset ground stock crank (3.71" or so and it's plenty strong) you can do 397 or 403 for about the same price as an iron block with a Callies or Lunati stroke. The difference is that it's undersquare, so it'll rev much better, and the 4.125 or 4.155" bore will allow more airflow at high rpms. Not to mention it's lighter than the iron block and makes similar torque and horsepower numbers with less displacement and generally less radical cams.
I agree, we prefer to stay as close to square as possible or be a little under square. the benefit of more cubes by being over square is sometimes not worth the potential issues.
Old 07-30-2005, 08:34 AM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
Scoobie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Would an LS2 402 be cheaper then an LS1 397 or 403?
Old 07-30-2005, 11:04 AM
  #14  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Beast96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Scoobie
Would an LS2 402 be cheaper then an LS1 397 or 403?
Considering you used the same exact parts in each motor, the LS2 would cost more because the block is more expensive and it has to be seasoned. As far as I can see, the diffrences are in the block price only.
Old 07-30-2005, 12:40 PM
  #15  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
ovaltobowtie2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So now your saying to that you dont recommend going over sqaure. Well everyone that has a 427 is oversqaure and they are getting it done. Im confused. So if I were to go with an LQ4 block 4.030 bore with a 4 inch stroke.......what CID would that be?? 408?
Thanks

This is going in a z06 and I have had people tell me not to do an iron block. I cant imagine 75lbs. making a huge difference. I meen these guys that add chargers are putting 50-60lbs on there front end as well. So I figure I might as well do it with cubes.

Your thoughts.
Old 07-30-2005, 01:01 PM
  #16  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
Demon SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Pewee Valley,Ky
Posts: 824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ovaltobowtie2
So now your saying to that you dont recommend going over sqaure. Well everyone that has a 427 is oversqaure and they are getting it done. Im confused. So if I were to go with an LQ4 block 4.030 bore with a 4 inch stroke.......what CID would that be?? 408?
Thanks

This is going in a z06 and I have had people tell me not to do an iron block. I cant imagine 75lbs. making a huge difference. I meen these guys that add chargers are putting 50-60lbs on there front end as well. So I figure I might as well do it with cubes.

Your thoughts.
i was just pointing out that you could do a 421ci they way I described it. In an out of square setup I prefer to have a little more bore than stroke. Actually most(if not all) 427's are a 4.125" bore and a 4" stroke or under square. The added weight of the iron block causes some weight transfer issues, but the extra weight of the iron block can be over come with suspension upgrades and weight reduction in other parts of the car.
a 4.030 bore and a 4" stroke would be a 408ci
a 4.060 bore and a 4" stroke would be a 414ci, some of the iron blocks can be bored to a 4.060 bore, just need to sonic check the block to be sure.
Old 08-01-2005, 11:16 PM
  #17  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (44)
 
XpEdItIoUs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Are ls2 402 reliable, dont you just need to get a 4.00 stroke crank and it will make it a 402 im thinking of building a shortblock and the 402 sounded like a good choice.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:54 AM.