Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: AFR or TEA
Spend the extra money on the better head
97
68.31%
Save a bit of money and put it toward another mod or tuning
45
31.69%
Voters: 142. You may not vote on this poll

AFR vs TEA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-06-2005, 09:37 AM
  #101  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (98)
 
99ssleeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

So can anyone answer....how would the GMPP LS6 heads compare?

With the GMPP LS6 heads' 61cc chamber, pistons out roughly .007, and a GM head gasket of .054"....static compression is 11.2:1.

With my intake valve closing angle of 40°, the effected compression is at 8.7:1....unless I've made an error somewhere along the way...

Is this too much?
Old 08-06-2005, 09:53 AM
  #102  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 99ssleeper
So can anyone answer....how would the GMPP LS6 heads compare?

With the GMPP LS6 heads' 61cc chamber, pistons out roughly .007, and a GM head gasket of .054"....static compression is 11.2:1.

With my intake valve closing angle of 40°, the effected compression is at 8.7:1....unless I've made an error somewhere along the way...

Is this too much?
Actualy you'll be at 10.7:1 SCR
Old 08-06-2005, 10:02 AM
  #103  
Banned
iTrader: (23)
 
JZ'sTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Ft. Myers Fl
Posts: 3,126
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

And no it isn't too much as long as you have good gas. 93 octane should work great.
Old 08-06-2005, 11:04 AM
  #104  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (98)
 
99ssleeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
Actualy you'll be at 10.7:1 SCR
How do you figure?

I've done it twice and get 11.2 with the .054 gaskets and 11.0 with the .060 gaskets.
Old 08-06-2005, 11:11 AM
  #105  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
98A4LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

As long as the cylinder heads are quality pieces, meets my goals, and priced right, I could care less what name is on them. my 0.02
Old 08-06-2005, 11:28 AM
  #106  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 99ssleeper
How do you figure?

I've done it twice and get 11.2 with the .054 gaskets and 11.0 with the .060 gaskets.
http://www.c5frc.com/calculators/Com...Calculator.htm
Old 08-06-2005, 11:36 AM
  #107  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (98)
 
99ssleeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Ahh...I was using a bore of 3.910, not 3.898

:thumbsup:
Old 08-06-2005, 12:42 PM
  #108  
Banned
iTrader: (23)
 
JZ'sTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Ft. Myers Fl
Posts: 3,126
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Damn 3.910 bore.
Cant even get that big with a forged setup.
Old 08-06-2005, 01:57 PM
  #109  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (98)
 
99ssleeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

cometic head gaskets are 3.910 for whatever reason. i dont know if the GM ones are that way too...

:shrug:
Old 08-06-2005, 02:26 PM
  #110  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Beast96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

FWIW, this calculator is the same as the one on ross pistons website. The piston height section will not read past zero deck. Notice it says, "enter .0001 for zero deck", it will not go past this for "out of the hole readings". When you enter .007" for your piston height, your actually telling it your piston is .007 in the hole. You have to enter a negative number if the piston sticks up past the deck, which this calculator will not read. When I figure it into this one: http://www.rbracing-rsr.com/compstaticcalc.html , I get 11.09 for his compression using the numbers he stated at the top of this page. I'd reccomend saving this calculator because it is LS1 friendly, whearas you have been getting false readings from the others.
Old 08-06-2005, 02:28 PM
  #111  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Beast96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JZ'sTA
Damn 3.910 bore.
Cant even get that big with a forged setup.
Why not? my 383 was a 3.910 with 3.905 pistons. This leaves .005" ring clearence roughly. It a pretty common over bore on the stock block.
Old 08-06-2005, 03:04 PM
  #112  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Beast96Z
FWIW, this calculator is the same as the one on ross pistons website. The piston height section will not read past zero deck. Notice it says, "enter .0001 for zero deck", it will not go past this for "out of the hole readings". When you enter .007" for your piston height, your actually telling it your piston is .007 in the hole. You have to enter a negative number if the piston sticks up past the deck, which this calculator will not read. When I figure it into this one: http://www.rbracing-rsr.com/compstaticcalc.html , I get 11.09 for his compression using the numbers he stated at the top of this page. I'd reccomend saving this calculator because it is LS1 friendly, whearas you have been getting false readings from the others.
Ahhh soooooo.

No wonder I always under estimate. ****, I never paid attention to that.
One blind ****.

Thanks for pointing that out Beast.

Man, that means with my PRC's I'll be 10.97:1 (I like that)

Last edited by PREDATOR-Z; 08-06-2005 at 03:12 PM.
Old 08-06-2005, 04:22 PM
  #113  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (98)
 
99ssleeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Beast96Z
I get 11.09 for his compression using the numbers he stated at the top of this page.
Thanks...I knew I went through my Thermodynamics class for a reason. Looks like 60.9cc chambers with .060 MLS gaskets puts me at 11:1...quench is about .053...
Old 08-06-2005, 08:23 PM
  #114  
11 Second Club
 
Spellbound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Norcal
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I have had good results with both TEA and AFR

On my WS6...467, mods in sig...
My GF's car with TEA 5.3's, 430 locked, 410 unlocked with a 224/228 114 cam.
My ZO is a hybrid, AFR castings ported by TEA. 473/446< summer tune lol. Last winter it dynoed 488 Same dyno.
Old 08-07-2005, 12:38 AM
  #115  
On The Tree
 
04Yukonxl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Denver CO.
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

How do the AFR 225s compare? The port volume is not that much more than the 205 and is sure less than other Stage III ported heads.
Old 08-07-2005, 01:13 AM
  #116  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 138 Likes on 115 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 99ssleeper
So can anyone answer....how would the GMPP LS6 heads compare?

With the GMPP LS6 heads' 61cc chamber, pistons out roughly .007, and a GM head gasket of .054"....static compression is 11.2:1.

With my intake valve closing angle of 40°, the effected compression is at 8.7:1....unless I've made an error somewhere along the way...

Is this too much?
Static Compression will be 10.71232231:1 with .054" gasket and 61cc chambers.

With .060" gasket it is 10.55853614:1 and 61cc chambers.

Actual formula is: Compression Ratio = Cylinder vol. + clearance vol. + piston Comp. vol. + gasket vol. + chamber vol. divided by Clearance vol. + piston vol. + gasket vol. + chamber vol.
Old 08-07-2005, 04:46 AM
  #117  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JakeFusion
Static Compression will be 10.71232231:1 with .054" gasket and 61cc chambers.

With .060" gasket it is 10.55853614:1 and 61cc chambers.

Actual formula is: Compression Ratio = Cylinder vol. + clearance vol. + piston Comp. vol. + gasket vol. + chamber vol. divided by Clearance vol. + piston vol. + gasket vol. + chamber vol.
Now I'm confused. That is what I got with the calculator I used.
http://www.c5frc.com/calculators/Com...Calculator.htm

But with this one it is different (putting a negative figure for out of hole)
http://www.rbracing-rsr.com/compstaticcalc.html

Which one is right???
Old 08-07-2005, 09:24 AM
  #118  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (98)
 
99ssleeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by JakeFusion
Static Compression will be 10.71232231:1 with .054" gasket and 61cc chambers.

With .060" gasket it is 10.55853614:1 and 61cc chambers.

Actual formula is: Compression Ratio = Cylinder vol. + clearance vol. + piston vol. + gasket vol. + chamber vol. divided by Clearance vol. + piston vol. + gasket vol. + chamber vol.

Yup, just remember to subtract the clearence volume since the pistons come out fo the hole. And piston volume here is zero so that can just be omitted.

I'll be going with the 02+ GM MLS gaskets. Unless you guys see any reason to go with something else??? (PTV clearance and compression an issue)
Old 08-07-2005, 11:19 AM
  #119  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (98)
 
99ssleeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

I still get 11.07:1 with 60cc chambers and .060" gaskets....

Cyl vol= 43.2595 cid
Chamber vol= 3.661425 cid
Clearance vol (piston out)= -.0835356 cid
.060 Head Gasket Vol= .7160194 cid

So,
Swept vol= 43.2595 + 3.661425 - .0835356 + .7160194 = 47.553409 cid
Unswept vol= 3.661425 - .0835356 + .7160194 = 4.293909 cid

Swept/Unswept= 11.07..............11.07:1 SCR

Anyone back me up on this?
Old 08-07-2005, 12:03 PM
  #120  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Beast96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
Now I'm confused. That is what I got with the calculator I used.
http://www.c5frc.com/calculators/Com...Calculator.htm

But with this one it is different (putting a negative figure for out of hole)
http://www.rbracing-rsr.com/compstaticcalc.html

Which one is right???
Like I said before, you have to factor in the piston coming out of the hole. The C5frc calculator does not allow you to go past zero deck. Even if you use the formula Jake posted, your piston height should be a negative number, it's never a positive unless the piston is in the hole.

As far as these numbers are concerned, aren't the heads supposed to be 61cc and the gaskets .064"? With the 3.898x3.622 with a -.008 piston height, .060" gaskets, and 60cc chambers, I get 11.09.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:15 PM.