Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

I bought the G5X3 cam... does anyone have info?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-10-2007 | 11:34 AM
  #21  
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
TECH Senior Member

 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 16
From: BFE
Default

Not on a 112 lsa, it is a bit tighter than .080/.100, but a few poeple run them like that.
I advise to degree the cam to make sure it is installed at said LSA/ICL (this also verifies the grind is correct).
And this is with a stock valved/unmilled/stock gasket setup.
Old 04-10-2007 | 06:44 PM
  #22  
one2run's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
From: Crestview, FL
Default

I am in the market, and this cam is what I would like to install. I have 243 heads/stock valve size and unmilled. Stock GM graphite head gaskets. As long I know it will fit with out fly cutting, it's going in by the wheel. Does anyone know if there is any advance ground into the 112 cam? If so, the 114 may be more of what I am needing for more power in the lower rpm's.
Old 04-10-2007 | 06:57 PM
  #23  
ExceSSive's Avatar
12 Second Club

iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 1
From: Gateway International Raceway
Default

I think you would be OK but the 114 may be what you are looking, you could email LG and see what they say about the PTV clearance if they have any info.
Old 04-11-2007 | 12:44 AM
  #24  
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
TECH Senior Member

 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 16
From: BFE
Default

Originally Posted by one2run
I am in the market, and this cam is what I would like to install. I have 243 heads/stock valve size and unmilled. Stock GM graphite head gaskets. As long I know it will fit with out fly cutting, it's going in by the wheel. Does anyone know if there is any advance ground into the 112 cam? If so, the 114 may be more of what I am needing for more power in the lower rpm's.
112 for more low rpm power, 114 moves the band higher in rpms.
114 will have more clearance and is better suited for street safe applications.
112 is below recommended "safe" PTV margins, still not too bad though. Less of an issue in autos than M6s.
Old 08-27-2008 | 07:41 PM
  #25  
c5_ls1_6spd's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
112 for more low rpm power, 114 moves the band higher in rpms.
114 will have more clearance and is better suited for street safe applications.
112 is below recommended "safe" PTV margins, still not too bad though. Less of an issue in autos than M6s.
if they can get a HPE Megadeath (242/244 111LSA) and a Trex to fit in a stock block 346 with LS6 heads, then I don't see whats the problem with a G5X3
Old 08-27-2008 | 08:05 PM
  #26  
dyls1's Avatar
Launching!

iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
Default

Originally Posted by c5_ls1_6spd
if they can get a HPE Megadeath (242/244 111LSA) and a Trex to fit in a stock block 346 with LS6 heads, then I don't see whats the problem with a G5X3

how old is this thread
Old 08-27-2008 | 09:46 PM
  #27  
JPH's Avatar
JPH
TECH Junkie

iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,776
Likes: 0
From: Fort Wayne, IN
Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
234/242, .600/.612
But cam cards may vary a little, just like T-rex's (no 2 alike)
Sorry Mark, it's a little bigger then this. Trust me, I have doctored one.
Old 08-28-2008 | 06:32 PM
  #28  
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
TECH Senior Member

 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 16
From: BFE
Default

So have I and it was 235.x/243.x, I'm searching for that old report, hold your breath
Old 08-28-2008 | 10:11 PM
  #29  
JPH's Avatar
JPH
TECH Junkie

iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,776
Likes: 0
From: Fort Wayne, IN
Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
So have I and it was 235.x/243.x, I'm searching for that old report, hold your breath
LOL, I got 236.1/243.4 .599/.609 114.5
Old 08-28-2008 | 10:20 PM
  #30  
tnmotown's Avatar
11 Second Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (107)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 24
From: Cali
Default

damn....this makes me wanna hurry and put my G5x4 in my car
Old 08-29-2008 | 01:30 AM
  #31  
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
TECH Senior Member

 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 16
From: BFE
Default

Originally Posted by JPH
LOL, I got 236.1/243.4 .599/.609 114.5
Yeah, that is normal, every grind will vary a bit, depends on machine calibration at time of grind, 2* variance is acceptable norm for grinds.

The generic lobe specs are 234/242 XE-R

3727r/3731r
Your choice of LSA/ICL
Old 08-29-2008 | 02:01 AM
  #32  
N4cer's Avatar
10 Second Club

iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,526
Likes: 1
From: Ashland, KY
Default

Mine spec'ed out to exactly 234/242 .600/.610 112 +4. As did a few others I've seen.
Both the G5X2 and G5X3 have 4* advance ground in.
Old 08-29-2008 | 03:11 AM
  #33  
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
TECH Senior Member

 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 16
From: BFE
Default

Definately a good cam

Last edited by PREDATOR-Z; 08-29-2008 at 09:32 AM.
Old 08-29-2008 | 08:51 AM
  #34  
J-Rod's Avatar
6600 rpm clutch dump of death Administrator
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,983
Likes: 7
From: Texas
Default

Wow, holy back from the dead thread Batman.

Well, if you want to see the videos of the cam, they are on Youtube under JRodZ06

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OI0RN64WhtA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vlt6com4mZI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYMKvHaWTzk
Old 08-29-2008 | 09:09 AM
  #35  
Tuner@Straightline's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Default

Have really like this cam, I had it in my car (393rwhp Mustang Dyno, A4, Yank4000, headers, cai) ran 11.6@117 with a 1.51 60'. I have had one 2002 A4 F-body make 412rwhp (Mustang dyno) with this cam with the same set up as mine. I've also had a headers cam LS6 with this cam make 422rwhp on our Mustang dyno.



Quick Reply: I bought the G5X3 cam... does anyone have info?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:18 AM.