MrBill97396

iTrader: (10)

Well what is the real reason for your mechanic to tell you not to go with it ? Like it has been stated in this thread many times you have alot of people's personal opinions and expierences. We stand behind our product and will take care of any problems or issues you may have. 281-448-1300

jrp

iTrader: (16)

best first post by a newb

jrp

iTrader: (16)

like a muthafucka

i agree with whats been stated in the thread already, dont rush into making a cam dicision. most people research for months just to narrow it down to a handful of choices. the S cam looks good, however there arent very many comparisons of real world 346's that i've seen. it all depends on what your looking for and the intended application. the S IMO looks better suited for the track, carries great power too 7k and has some good top end pull. the low end tq is bit soggy to me. ~375 peak and thats with top of the line bolt ons (kooks, Fast 90, ect). you can always go the road more traveled and go with the venerable FM13. results can be found with a myriad of combinations so it gives you an better overall view of what the cam is capable. you've got to look at both the high and low end of the spectrums to get an average. dont expect to just throw in the cam and best or equal some of thee 440rwhp cam only setups that have come with the FM13.

bottom line its your decision.

s.o.m.SS

iTrader: (1)

narrowed down between....
->XE-R 232/236 .595/.602 114lsa +1advance
->g5-x2 232/240 .595/.608
->TSP 233/237 .598/.603
->F-14 232/234 .598/.598 112 OR 114 LSA
->TSP 25MS3 MAGIC STICK 237/242 .603/.609 113(CLEARS STOCK PISTONS WITH STOCK HEADS)

let me know what you all think...

Chuck@

iTrader: (1)

I didn't read this whole thread, so I'm just replying to this single post because i think it sums it all up.

Can you define what an "insane *** cam" is? I've put countless S cams in daily driven vehicles, and never had one person come back and say, "This cam is too big, i don't like the way it drives". The only comments I ever get are that they can't believe how GOOD the cam drives. I have guys who's wives daily drive S cams in their GTO's, and they're nothing but happy.

The cars drive like stock, but just make much more power The only noticeable thing about the S cam is the idle. It idles lopier than stock, haha. But everything else is perfect.

The only thing in my opinion that makes a cam too big is when the person tuning it can't make it run right. And that happens all the time.

Bring it to me and it'll be like the factory installed it. No problems. If you don't like it I'll take it out of the car and put it back to stock for free.

Chuck

777

iTrader: (21)

Now who would ever drive a cammed ls1 and say I don't like it, put it back to stock

Chuck@

iTrader: (1)

Well he seems worried that he won't like a certain cam. So I'm just giving him a satisfaction guarantee.

Chuck

777

iTrader: (21)

I know, just trying to be funny... I'm not good at it.

SideStep

Can't ask for more than that!!!

gnx7

iTrader: (28)

Realize that these cams with 230+ duration have powerbands in the 4500-7K range.... below that a 224/224 or 225/225 cam will kick its butt.

I plotted my dyno graph against a friend with nearly identical mods (I have AFR 205's and he has GTP Stage 3 5.3's). I had a 233/239 and he was running a 225/225 both on 112LSA's. He made 40rwhp more at 2500-4K and 30rwtq torque more. From 4-6K the difference was smaller... and only at 6200rpm+ did my car outperform his. He made 428rwhp and I made 431rwhp on that session..... I don't have as much problem keeping the tires planted in 2nd/3rd as him... but he has much more mid range power... mine has to really be wrung out to get all the power out of it.

Just a few more ideas to think about. I like my 233/239.... but had a 228/228 ground up to get some more of my midrange back.

blkZ28spt

You can't make a direct comparison between two different cars. You really want to make it interesting switch cams and have them retuned, then compare. I'll be very interested to see how much midrange you get when going smaller. If all else were equal you should make more than 3 piddling horsepower more than him as is. Of course, all is NOT equal.

gnx7

iTrader: (28)

His dyno graph of a 233/239 in his car on the same dyno (different day) was nearly identical to mine... he did make a few more HP/TQ here and there but overall they were almost identical graphs.

Just stating that 23x+ duration cams are more for top end power.

Chuck@

iTrader: (1)

I have never seen one case where the car lost low end power after installing a cam (big or small). The difference between yours and your buddies car is more likely to be related to the heads than it is your cams.

Chuck

blkZ28spt

What I am saying is that you can't adquately come to that conclusion based on your example. WAY too many variables.

777

iTrader: (21)

Umm I beg to differ...My car feels much more sluggish down low than a stock ls1

Moparnos (The SLP Guy)

iTrader: (55)

hpe's r cam all the way