Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

carbed LS1 motors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-21-2005, 06:16 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Q8CamaRo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: State of Kuwait
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default carbed LS1 motors

is it worth it to install the carburator on H/C engine?
thanks
Old 11-21-2005, 06:18 PM
  #2  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
Turbo LS1 SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Buffalo
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

NO, your welcome....
Old 11-21-2005, 06:22 PM
  #3  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Q8CamaRo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: State of Kuwait
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Turbo LS1 SS
NO, your welcome....
then prove it why not? if u don`t mind
Old 11-21-2005, 06:41 PM
  #4  
ЯєŧąяĐ Єl¡m¡иąŧøя ™
iTrader: (18)
 
orangeapeel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Justin, TX
Posts: 16,083
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

well, you will end up spending more money on ignition peices as well. What is wrong with EFI? It is probably easier to tune and maintain....less moving parts IMO.

MSD would not mind if you switch to carb setup.
Old 11-21-2005, 06:52 PM
  #5  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (5)
 
chaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,459
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

This is interesting. I mean a carb set up would be a nice trick in an engine like this. If asked old school guys (like my old man) they would tell you how a finely tuned carb would beat or equal the best EFI.

Another point in adding a carb would be looks. I mean I love my LS1 but its not the prettiest engine around.

Any other opinions?
Old 11-21-2005, 06:54 PM
  #6  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Q8CamaRo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: State of Kuwait
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by orangeapeel
well, you will end up spending more money on ignition peices as well. What is wrong with EFI? It is probably easier to tune and maintain....less moving parts IMO.

MSD would not mind if you switch to carb setup.
i haven`t purchased it yet, just asking for opinions is it better than F.A.S.T 90 intake? to be used with TSP ms3?
thanks dude
Old 11-21-2005, 08:28 PM
  #7  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
S1LV3R's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

If you drive the car on a regular basis I would not recommend going to a carb. This is coming from someone who has driven a carbed vehicle on a daily basis. I don't see you running something with an electric choke and small cfm rating with the large cam and good flowing heads so cold starts(manual choke) are gonna be a bitch.
The only way a carb will come close to a well tuned EFI setup is at wide open throttle.IMO If you're afraid of exceeding the limits of a "factory based intake"(LS6,FAST), then get a single plane carb intake for use with EFI. It will still look killer and you won't have leaning problems of #7 and #8 common with the "stock" type intakes.
Old 11-21-2005, 08:44 PM
  #8  
Teching In
 
LQ4Monte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

In a stock EFI system like your 98 I'd go with the fast 90. The EFI vs. carb debate can go round and round, but in the end the EFI system will be more efficient and easier to keep in tune. In your case you already have EFI and unless you are trying for a drag only car I'd stick with it.

I on the other hand am installing the carbed setup on my Monte. The main reason being the car was already setup for a high performance carburetor setup, including a pretty pricey carb.
Old 11-21-2005, 09:12 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (42)
 
SUTTERERMAN85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: North Fort Worth
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

i agree you will be a lot better off with the efi unless you just want to the looks. efi will be much eaiser to tune and get much better mpg. start up and cold starts will be much better also.
Old 11-22-2005, 04:06 PM
  #10  
Launching!
 
bulletLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Guatemala City.
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

isnt that like putting piston-prop engine to your LEARJET!!!!!

"Improving?"..... hmmmm HARDLY

Last edited by bulletLS1; 11-22-2005 at 04:13 PM. Reason: more ideas
Old 11-23-2005, 05:13 AM
  #11  
ЯєŧąяĐ Єl¡m¡иąŧøя ™
iTrader: (18)
 
orangeapeel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Justin, TX
Posts: 16,083
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Personally you could get a bad *** setup with FAST or whatever and some other goodies that will improve your overall performance instead of giving you a different look and putting you back to almost basically where you started at square one as far as power goes. (wow that was a heck of a sentence!)
Old 11-23-2005, 06:39 AM
  #12  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Q8CamaRo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: State of Kuwait
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

thanks all , all replies appreciated ,, i think i`m gonna order the FAST 90/90
Old 11-23-2005, 08:27 AM
  #13  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
Steel Chicken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Castle Rock, CO
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chaman
This is interesting. I mean a carb set up would be a nice trick in an engine like this. If asked old school guys (like my old man) they would tell you how a finely tuned carb would beat or equal the best EFI.

Another point in adding a carb would be looks. I mean I love my LS1 but its not the prettiest engine around.

Any other opinions?
no disprespect to your old man, but hes wrong. modern EFI is leaps and bounds more efficient, easier to tune and adjust, and if tuned correctly can make more power over the entire RPM range than a carb can.

the reason why people can buy hot cams nowadays and get their cars to idle decent is EFI. take a similar cam, and try to get it run right with a carb? Good luck.
Old 11-23-2005, 09:02 AM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (14)
 
DAPSUPRSLO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Salisbury,MD
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

In my opinion anything that uses a real intake (single plane 4150 flange manifold) will be superior for seaking max power. As far as driveability the fast, ls6/ls1/ls2 manfiolds have the edge there for sure. How bout a single plane manifold with efi, that's the best of both, but still will suffer a little as far as driveability compared to the ls6 style.
Old 11-23-2005, 09:20 AM
  #15  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Q8CamaRo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: State of Kuwait
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DAPSUPRSLO
In my opinion anything that uses a real intake (single plane 4150 flange manifold) will be superior for seaking max power. As far as driveability the fast, ls6/ls1/ls2 manfiolds have the edge there for sure. How bout a single plane manifold with efi, that's the best of both, but still will suffer a little as far as driveability compared to the ls6 style.
man the car is just a weekend toy
so i don`t care about anything but the best intake
do u have pics for what r u talking about? "single plane manifold with efi"
Old 11-23-2005, 09:25 AM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (14)
 
DAPSUPRSLO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Salisbury,MD
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Q8CamaRo
man the car is just a weekend toy
so i don`t care about anything but the best intake
do u have pics for what r u talking about? "single plane manifold with efi"
https://ls1tech.com/forums/attachmen...chmentid=46845

This is a member's car which happesn to run ver very strong, all though he is max effort.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/drag-racing-results/410670-na-408-9-27-145-mph.html

I'll have a few pictures of my setup too once HPE gets things wrapped up for me. My intake may be just a hair bigger then the one you see here, he he
Old 11-23-2005, 09:38 AM
  #17  
Moderator
iTrader: (11)
 
jimmyblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Central Florida
Posts: 12,604
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

If you just look at a single plane (GMPP or
whatever) intake, it's pretty obvious that
it is going to flow better (big, straight,
short runners) than the stock style intakes.

Whether that will make more power, and
where, depends. A resonating style intake
with long runners acts in the same style as
long tube headers. You might see less mid-
band torque out of the single plane. You will
probably see inferior low speed atomization
and so on. If you have the cam and heads to
put your torque peak at 6000RPM, go for it.

A 90mm inlet hole might have more area than
four "little" Dominator or even smaller square-
bore throats. You'd have to measure them up
and calculate it. But I think it's the runners and
the plenum-runner turn that limit per-cylinder
air draw.

In the CHP article I read, the carb style (with
carb and HEI) made more power, 500HP-ish
dyno, than the same motor EFI/LS6.

If I were putting (say) a 6.0 truck motor and
6-speed into a resto rod, you bet your *** I'd
go carb and HEI. Set it, and forget it. Single
wire ignition, no closed loop nuthin'. I have
been driving carbureted beaters for over 25
years and drivability, schmivability. Get a cable
choke kit from DiscoAutoPartz if you live where
it's cold. Borrow a wideband for jet selection
and maybe some idle / transition circuit fiddling.
Old 11-23-2005, 09:48 AM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (14)
 
DAPSUPRSLO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Salisbury,MD
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

http://www.compcams.com/community/pr...69camaro-1997/

There's a good example of how the single plain intake will act on a more street oriented setup. Note that this car only has a 230/236 cam on a 112 and still makes crazy horsepower. Obviously the sb2 heads are suprerior to most gen 3 stuff but it's a good example of how the torque peak is high as Jimmyblue indicated. Further, like Jimmyblue indicated you may luz some power, and probably will, in the under 6000 range on just about anything other then a big cubic inch or high rpm motor based on the lack of resonance tuning in those rpms with one of these short runner intakes.
Old 11-23-2005, 09:50 AM
  #19  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Q8CamaRo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: State of Kuwait
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

from where can i get the single plane mainfold
and wich carbs will fit
Old 11-23-2005, 09:53 AM
  #20  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (14)
 
DAPSUPRSLO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Salisbury,MD
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Q8CamaRo
from where can i get the single plane mainfold
and wich carbs will fit
SDPC has the gmpp manifold but if it were me I'd look into the new victor single plane from edelbrock like mat346 has on his car. Good luck.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:15 AM.