Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

LS6 Conversion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 04:40 PM
  #1  
redmist's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Default LS6 Conversion

I know LS6 heads will bolt right on to an LS1 block but can I use my LS1 intake as well or do I have to go to an LS6 intake? I know an LS6 intake would be optimal but there is only so much money in the bank.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 04:57 PM
  #2  
SouthFL.02.SS's Avatar
!LS1 11 Second Club
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 7,133
Likes: 2
From: Miami
Default

Are you getting ported LS6 heads or your out of the box 243 castings?
Look at these 2 threads FYI before caughing up cash for stockers:

https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iii-internal-engine/422330-livernois-motorsports-cnc-ported-ls2-ls6-cylinder-heads-949-00-no-core-required.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/sponsor-sales-specials/423148-new-patriot-cnc-ported-243-castings-845-00-per-pair.html
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 08:15 PM
  #3  
redmist's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Default

No I got the the ones in the first thread you mentioned.
Can you help me with my question?
Thanks1
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2005 | 12:13 AM
  #4  
AnthonyR's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
From: S.FL
Default

You can use the ls1 intake with no problem.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2005 | 10:05 PM
  #5  
itchygomey98's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 617
Likes: 0
Default

Yea, you can use the LS1 for now and just upgrade it later. It'll hold your new heads back some, but it will get you by.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2005 | 01:01 AM
  #6  
blkZ28spt's Avatar
11 Second Club
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,524
Likes: 1
From: The South
Default

Replace with an LS6 or better intake ASAP.

I made 343 rwhp with an MS3, lid and full exhaust on my A4. Upgraded to an LS6 intake manifold, added an SLP underdrive pulley and a retune with the intake/pulley landed me at 385 rwhp. That is a 42 rwhp net gain. Given that a pulley is worth about 10 rwhp that may or may not show up in full on a dyno that's a minimum gain of 32 rwhp from the intake. That LS1 intake just doesn't flow well enough and will probably choke the crap out of your top end.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2005 | 10:32 AM
  #7  
redmist's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Default

Thanks all for your responses. Yep I realize the LS6 is optimal but like all of us at one time or another i'm tapped out.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2005 | 01:00 PM
  #8  
blkZ28spt's Avatar
11 Second Club
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,524
Likes: 1
From: The South
Default

Originally Posted by redmist
Thanks all for your responses. Yep I realize the LS6 is optimal but like all of us at one time or another i'm tapped out.
Spending money on heads/cam with the stock intake is not getting the most for your money. An intake is so much cheaper than heads and/or cam why spend the money for heads/cam and have a stock intake that may cost you a large percentage of what you would otherwise have?

Look at my example. Why spend $1,350 for a cam/spring swap and dyno tune to get 343 rwhp (A4) because of an LS1 intake manifold?

Just don't be dissapointed if you have very poor horsepower numbers until you get a better intake on there.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:25 AM.