Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

comp cheater lobes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-03-2006, 06:51 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
algws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: El Paso
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default comp cheater lobes

has anyone used these lobes before?
lobes are 3404 and 3400.
.006 .05 .200 lift
285 232 147 580
289 236 151 580

112+4
Old 04-03-2006, 10:56 PM
  #2  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Beast96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

It can be done. I talked to Comp about having these lobes ground and they said they could do it on a LS1 journal. It would deffinatlly be something diffrent.
Old 04-04-2006, 08:31 AM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
algws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: El Paso
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

anyone else? supposedly these are big in the mustang classes that have to weigh at least 3000 lb and are limited on what lift they can run.
Old 04-04-2006, 10:00 AM
  #4  
On The Tree
iTrader: (8)
 
blubird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by algws6
anyone else? supposedly these are big in the mustang classes that have to weigh at least 3000 lb and are limited on what lift they can run.
I am running these lobes. If you plan on using them you will need to flycut your pistons. They are very aggressive.
Old 04-04-2006, 11:28 AM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
algws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: El Paso
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by blubird
I am running these lobes. If you plan on using them you will need to flycut your pistons. They are very aggressive.
how do you figure they are less aggressive than the XER lobes. from what i understand duration determines your P/V clearance not the lobe profile. anyone else?
Old 04-04-2006, 12:13 PM
  #6  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
cantdrv65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: TEXASS
Posts: 3,202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Post

Originally Posted by algws6
how do you figure they are less aggressive than the XER lobes. from what i understand duration determines your P/V clearance not the lobe profile. anyone else?
Take advertised duration - duration at .050 and you will see these lobes appear even MORE agressive than the LSK lobes! That being said Id expect this cam to make slightly more power than an XER but less than an LSK because the LSK offers a little more lift despite being slightly less agressive than this cheater lobe.
Old 04-04-2006, 12:31 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
algws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: El Paso
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i thought the higher the number the less aggressive?
Old 04-04-2006, 12:33 PM
  #8  
On The Tree
iTrader: (8)
 
blubird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The advertised, .05 and .200 only tell part of the story. My cam is 232/236 580/580 113 icl 113 lsa, and I just pulled the heads of to discover that everyone of my pistons had a rather large semicircular divit in them. That's how I figure. Just because the LSK XER lobes have more lift doesn't mean they will make more power. Keep in mind most of the ported stock heads don't flow much more part .600 lift and some actually lose flow. So .580 lift isn't that bad.
Old 04-04-2006, 12:44 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
algws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: El Paso
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by blubird
The advertised, .05 and .200 only tell part of the story. My cam is 232/236 580/580 113 icl 113 lsa, and I just pulled the heads of to discover that everyone of my pistons had a rather large semicircular divit in them. That's how I figure. Just because the LSK XER lobes have more lift doesn't mean they will make more power. Keep in mind most of the ported stock heads don't flow much more part .600 lift and some actually lose flow. So .580 lift isn't that bad.

where your heads milled any? what size valves where you using?
Old 04-04-2006, 01:02 PM
  #10  
On The Tree
iTrader: (8)
 
blubird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Heads were 5.3s w/ 2.02 intake valves milled .01. You might be able to get away with a stock head but from my experience I wouldn't try.
Old 04-04-2006, 01:15 PM
  #11  
LS1 Tech Administrator
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,244
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by algws6
has anyone used these lobes before?
lobes are 3404 and 3400.
.006 .05 .200 lift
285 232 147 580
289 236 151 580

112+4
Those Cheater lobes are much less aggressive than XE-R lobes or LSK lobes.
Using your example:
.006 .05 .200 lift
285 232 147 580 Cheater lobe
289 236 151 580 Cheater lobe
281 232 153 595 XE-R lobe
285 236 157 602 XE-R lobe
281 231 156 643 LSK lobe
285 235 160 646 LSK lobe

The aggressiveness of a lobe has to do with how fast the lifter gets off the cam base circle and into lift. The rate of lift from .006 to .050" is 53 degrees for Cheater, 49 degrees for XE-R and 50 for the LSK. The XE-R has the most aggressive ramp from .006 to .050", but the power is made after .050"...this is where the LSK lobes spank the other two lobes.

From .050 to .200", the Cheater is 85 degrees, the XE-R is 79 degrees and the LSK is 75 degrees. Basically that means the LSK lobe will give you 10 degrees more duration at .200" than the Cheater lobe with the same duration at .050" and less advertised duration. IMO, the Cheater lobes are weak. If they were the best, you'd see more people running them in LS1s.
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
Old 04-04-2006, 02:30 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
algws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: El Paso
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

patrick, do you know of anyone that has tried them? blu, what kind of numbers did you put down and what kind of times where you running? what were your supporting mods?
Old 04-04-2006, 04:23 PM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
algws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: El Paso
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by blubird
Heads were 5.3s w/ 2.02 intake valves milled .01. You might be able to get away with a stock head but from my experience I wouldn't try.

i thought you had plenty of room.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/451880-01-camaro-h-c-dyno-numbers.html
did you hit on the intake or exhaust?
Old 04-05-2006, 12:16 AM
  #14  
On The Tree
iTrader: (8)
 
blubird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I had no indication of PTV issues until I pulled the heads a couple of weeks ago. I never got any track results due various issues. I had trans problems followed by clutch problems followed by a spun rod bearing. I did notice when I pulled the intake off it appeared that #7 cylinder was not firing. All the intake ports except #7 had carbon deposits lining the port walls. #7 was completely clean. So who knows maybe once I get everything straightened out it will be respectable again.
Old 04-05-2006, 02:21 PM
  #15  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
cantdrv65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: TEXASS
Posts: 3,202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Post

Originally Posted by algws6
i thought the higher the number the less aggressive?
Yep as patrick pointed out I had it backwards.
Old 04-05-2006, 05:16 PM
  #16  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Beast96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

The cheaters a just a bit more harsh than the XE lobes. If someone was wanting something similar to a XE profile, but wanted the extra lift, this would be a good choice.
Old 04-05-2006, 07:28 PM
  #17  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
algws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: El Paso
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

why does it state "race only" in the comp catolog?
Old 04-05-2006, 07:32 PM
  #18  
LS1 Tech Administrator
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,244
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by algws6
why does it state "race only" in the comp catolog?
So maybe the uneducated will buy it!
Old 04-05-2006, 08:07 PM
  #19  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
algws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: El Paso
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

patrick, have you actually seen these lobes in action or are you just speculating?
Old 04-05-2006, 08:23 PM
  #20  
LS1 Tech Administrator
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,244
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

Haven't seen them in action, but based on their specs, I'd say they'd be be between XE and XE-R lobes. Since most people are running XE-R lobes, I'd say it would be taking a step down.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:38 PM.