Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

torquer II and everyday driver

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 12:01 PM
  #21  
co.6z28's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 738
Likes: 0
From: huntingtown ,MD
Default

t2 here in my dd, but its a m6 with 4.30's..............i say its do-able
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 12:01 PM
  #22  
GuitsBoy's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,249
Likes: 3
From: Long Island, NY
Default

Pred, When computing for DCR on the torquer, what IVC numbers are you using? I have been using the IVC at .006 number on the cam card, which is 71* on my cam with 2 degrees advance. Should I be going off the .050 IVC number and adding 15 before computing?

Also, I have the T2 cam in my daily driver, but I drive mostly highway, and i have heads. The added compression makes the t2 drive better than my f-13 was with stock heads. I probably wouldnt have gone so big on the cam if I drove mostly city miles. Since Im 80% highway, i think its perfect. It does take a little extra car driving in traffic though.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 12:13 PM
  #23  
Quik's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,893
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh!!!!!!!! Pa
Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
Yeah it will perform. Better with juice since juice will raise cylinder pressures.
If you could raise the DCR to 8.5 you could gain another 10>15 rwhp.
how do you suggest i do that
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 12:18 PM
  #24  
GuitsBoy's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,249
Likes: 3
From: Long Island, NY
Default

Originally Posted by Quik
how do you suggest i do that
Heads. Even if you dont port them, youd have to pull them to mill and use a thinner gasket.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 12:32 PM
  #25  
Quik's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,893
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh!!!!!!!! Pa
Default

Originally Posted by GuitsBoy
Heads. Even if you dont port them, youd have to pull them to mill and use a thinner gasket.
how much? im already at 10.9SCR
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 12:35 PM
  #26  
GuitsBoy's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,249
Likes: 3
From: Long Island, NY
Default

Originally Posted by Quik
how much? im already at 10.9SCR
Im sorry, I got you confused with the original poster who i believe said they were using stock heads. Predator-Z will be more informed about the 6.0 (not that its the limit of his more-informatationalnessositude).
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 12:52 PM
  #27  
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 17
From: BFE
Default

Originally Posted by GuitsBoy
Pred, When computing for DCR on the torquer, what IVC numbers are you using? I have been using the IVC at .006 number on the cam card, which is 71* on my cam with 2 degrees advance. Should I be going off the .050 IVC number and adding 15 before computing?

Also, I have the T2 cam in my daily driver, but I drive mostly highway, and i have heads. The added compression makes the t2 drive better than my f-13 was with stock heads. I probably wouldnt have gone so big on the cam if I drove mostly city miles. Since Im 80% highway, i think its perfect. It does take a little extra car driving in traffic though.
There is a spreadsheet that calculates (got it of J-Rod) saves time.
http://users3.ev1.net/~black_ops/cam...calculator.xls
You need the advertised duration numbers at .006 which are 281 and 283 respectively.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 12:57 PM
  #28  
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 17
From: BFE
Default

Originally Posted by Quik
how much? im already at 10.9SCR
see this might be a problem with your pistons,

For some reason I got you at 10.97>11.01 SCR depending on your piston deck height (but no accounting for gasket bore area.)

To optimise further 11.5 SCR and 8.56 DCR with 61 cc
and 11.67 SCR with 8.67 DCR with 60 cc

Keep in mind those figures are a close ballpark not exactly accurate due to the variation in parameters. So it is always good to take the least figure to avoid going over.

Last edited by PREDATOR-Z; Apr 30, 2006 at 01:11 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 01:09 PM
  #29  
Quik's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,893
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh!!!!!!!! Pa
Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
see this might be a problem with your pistons,

For some reason I got you at 10.97>11.01 SCR depending on your piston deck height
so you think ill have P/V issues right now?
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 01:13 PM
  #30  
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 17
From: BFE
Default

Originally Posted by Quik
so you think ill have P/V issues right now?
Not right now, but if you mill or reduce gaskets (the trick is how much can you go without PTV issue)
Are you stock valved? (I mean your motor LOL)
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 01:30 PM
  #31  
Quik's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,893
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh!!!!!!!! Pa
Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
Not right now, but if you mill or reduce gaskets (the trick is how much can you go without PTV issue)
Are you stock valved? (I mean your motor LOL)
yea stock 317 valves carried over to the 243 castings
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 01:58 PM
  #32  
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 17
From: BFE
Default

Originally Posted by Quik
yea stock 317 valves carried over to the 243 castings
This is what I would do:

I would measure PTV with a dial and get true values.
Then using a thinner gasket, I would raise the SCR/DCR as much possible without causing any PTV issues.
By doing this you're killing 3 birds (SCR/DCR and Quench)
Makes sense?
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 04:31 PM
  #33  
Quik's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,893
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh!!!!!!!! Pa
Default

yep, only issue i have a set of new gaskets in my pile of parts.
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 06:36 PM
  #34  
Brian2001SS's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 2
From: western NC
Default

Just for info, my TR224/114 pulled 431hp/410TQ last weekend with my 5.3 stg.2 Absolute Speed Heads.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
SDOC0328.pdf (48.4 KB, 99 views)
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:05 AM.