Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Heads&Cam or Force Induction

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 18, 2006 | 06:59 AM
  #1  
SlowPTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Default Heads&Cam or Force Induction

i have a 2000 trans am with an a brand new ls1 346 motor i plan on moddin it soon i first want to know from my fellow fbody members which one will be more reliable and have the overall performance.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2006 | 07:57 AM
  #2  
300bhp/ton's Avatar
TECH Addict
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,660
Likes: 14
From: England
Default

depends on goals and how much $$$$ you want to spend.

What mods do you have already? And what sort of new motor?

Running a mild boost setup will only yeild a little more HP than a good h/c setup but cost way more. Generally you won't need as many bolt ons for FI but a built motor is a requirement if you really intend to push the performance envelope.

Reliability is 6 of one and half a dozen of the other. High revs from h/c can be a PITA but detonation and other issues are more problomatic with boost.

Also remember if you plan on BIG HP you will also need all the supporting mods, brakes, suspension, chassis, built rear, built tranny, etc.

Best thing to do is set a budget and setup some initial goals. Then do some research and see whats possible and what isn't. And alter your budget and goals as you go.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2006 | 08:02 AM
  #3  
Grimes's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,636
Likes: 2
From: Northern NJ
Default

if you plan on forced induction, visit the section on this board. you will see that 9 times out of 10, it will end up costing way more than you initially thought. Once you add in the tuning, fuel system, upgraded parts.

Not saying its, bad (I would love a procharger), but it's not for the faint of heart either!
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2006 | 09:09 AM
  #4  
AdamSS's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
20 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Suburbs
Default

yup, yup - with power comes responsibility.....like upgraded fuel system, rear end, etc...

I'm thinking $10,000 for a reliable FI system+supporting "must have" parts.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2006 | 09:42 AM
  #5  
jub jub's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
From: Warner Robins, GA
Default

Forced induction is nice but, nothing beats the appeal of a nice sounding H/C car at the drive through!
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2006 | 02:46 PM
  #6  
2002/Black/SS's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 2
From: boca Raton, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by jub jub
Forced induction is nice but, nothing beats the appeal of a nice sounding H/C car at the drive through!
u can always have both......... also there is a good $4500 difference between H/C and forced induction
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2006 | 04:03 PM
  #7  
SVT THIS's Avatar
TECH Addict
20 Year Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,237
Likes: 1
From: Owasso, Ok
Default

I believe that the whine of an FI car is much more appealing than the loud, ungodly sounding H/C setup. I am actually leaning towards an FI setup over a H/C setup. You will keep a lot of your drivability and have more power than you could ever achieve with a H/C only setup.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2006 | 11:19 PM
  #8  
TopFlite's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
From: 415 Northern CA
Default

Personally, I'm leaning towards a camshaft and procharger in the near future.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2006 | 11:40 PM
  #9  
orangeapeel's Avatar
ЯєŧąяĐ Єl¡m¡иąŧøя ™
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 16,083
Likes: 4
From: Justin, TX
Default

I would have to say heads and cam. Gives you more bragging rights if you have your stuff dialed in. Plus N/A is respected. Not saying that FI is not though, because I will be leaning that way in the near future.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 01:09 AM
  #10  
seth webster's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: Greensboro NC
Default

Budget LS6 heads and MS4 cam with a fast 90/90 setup can give you up to 480rwhp NA, id go with the heads and cam unless you want to spend big$$$$$
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 03:23 AM
  #11  
ninetres's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,128
Likes: 4
From: Mufflerville, CA
Default

Originally Posted by seth webster
Budget LS6 heads and MS4 cam with a fast 90/90 setup can give you up to 480rwhp NA, id go with the heads and cam unless you want to spend big$$$$$
..............and flycutting.....
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 04:11 AM
  #12  
300bhp/ton's Avatar
TECH Addict
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,660
Likes: 14
From: England
Default

Originally Posted by ninetres
..............and flycutting.....
Not according to TSP you won't.

Originally Posted by seth webster
Budget LS6 heads and MS4 cam with a fast 90/90 setup can give you up to 480rwhp NA, id go with the heads and cam unless you want to spend big$$$$$
480rwhp - no chance, not on a 346ci and not on a Mustang Dyno corrected to SAE.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 05:34 AM
  #13  
orangeapeel's Avatar
ЯєŧąяĐ Єl¡m¡иąŧøя ™
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 16,083
Likes: 4
From: Justin, TX
Default

Originally Posted by 300bhp/ton
Not according to TSP you won't.


480rwhp - no chance, not on a 346ci and not on a Mustang Dyno corrected to SAE.

Don't pee on their parade. Patrick G made 48X/47X with the CheaTR setup or TRak....I don't remember.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 08:09 AM
  #14  
300bhp/ton's Avatar
TECH Addict
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,660
Likes: 14
From: England
Default

Originally Posted by orangeapeel
Don't pee on their parade. Patrick G made 48X/47X with the CheaTR setup or TRak....I don't remember.
Yes he did, but that was with a host of other goodies also (ported FAST 90/90). I think it was with the Trak cam and he only managed the headline number once, other runs where ~10rwhp lower. Also they where on an inertia Dynojet.

480rwhp Dynojet would be in the region of 449rwhp on a Mustang Dyno.

As for peeing on there parade - nah, I intend to get the MS4 and PRC LS6 heads myself. However if memory serves TSP showed some dyno results for the setup (~480rwhp) but it was on a 05 GTO, so a LS2 not LS1.

480 / 6 litres = 80bhp per litre specific output.

On a LS1:

80 x 5.7 litres = 456rwhp
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 09:37 AM
  #15  
King James's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
From: Terre Haute, IN
Default

Originally Posted by 300bhp/ton
480rwhp - no chance, not on a 346ci and not on a Mustang Dyno corrected to SAE.
Where the hell did Mustang dyno get put into this conversation?


I say throw a set of 317 heads on the car to lower compression, get a custom turbo or supercharger (which ever you choose) cam, and then go with something like a D1SC. Once you get things like the fuel system and driveline straightened out, turn up the boost and make 600+hp all day long.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 11:25 AM
  #16  
30th t/a's Avatar
TECH Junkie
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,168
Likes: 26
From: Butler, PA
Default

i did both. H/C is so simple and very fun and not super expensive and still pretty quick. the turbo route is BIG TIME expensive and complicated and lots of stupid BS. but when the turbos kick in...you'll know why people say turbos are the best. plus with the turbo you can drive it on a 2 hour cruise without having a headache. im stay with the turbo route.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 11:33 AM
  #17  
viewsonic's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SVT THIS
I believe that the whine of an FI car is much more appealing than the loud, ungodly sounding H/C setup. I am actually leaning towards an FI setup over a H/C setup. You will keep a lot of your drivability and have more power than you could ever achieve with a H/C only setup.
Not true.... I am making more power than most guys under boost...


I made 513rwhp and 457 rwtq with my H/C setup.

H/C with every bolt-on is about the same cost as a procharger.


I love my ungodly sounding H/C setup.... Sounds like good ol' fashioned American Muscle!
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 12:55 PM
  #18  
seth webster's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: Greensboro NC
Default

Originally Posted by viewsonic
I love my ungodly sounding H/C setup.... Sounds like good ol' fashioned American Muscle!



Reply
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 04:15 PM
  #19  
Urban Legend's Avatar
TECH Cry Baby BOSS APPROVED!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,799
Likes: 2
Default

My opinion here:

On a budget, heads and cam.

Disposable income, Procharger and the supporting cast (5 digits easily-just to get started).

Just my opinion after being in the FI game for almost 2 years.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2006 | 02:07 AM
  #20  
ninetres's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,128
Likes: 4
From: Mufflerville, CA
Default

Originally Posted by 300bhp/ton
Not according to TSP you won't.

TSP told my buddy (crazy camaro) the MS4 requires flycutting
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:36 PM.