Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: Forced Induction 500RWHP VS N/A 500RWHP
Forced Induction 500RWHP
40
24.24%
All Motor 500RWHP
125
75.76%
Voters: 165. You may not vote on this poll

Forced Induction 500RWHP VS N/A 500RWHP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-07-2006, 09:32 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
BLACKHAWK1998's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Forced Induction 500RWHP VS N/A 500RWHP

What do you guys think Forced Induction 500RWHP VS All Motor 500RWHP. Witch one will win a 1/4 mi race?
Old 11-07-2006, 10:24 PM
  #2  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
vince3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

both stock bottom end?
can the n/a be a stroker?
if both stock bottom end i think the FI car will win. it should make more tq.
if the n/a car had gears it could use the higher rpms more.

but you have to many different out comes.
which car wieghs more? transmission, gears, tires ect.
you are also asking two different comparisons.
two different ways to measure performance.
Old 11-07-2006, 10:26 PM
  #3  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
 
jeffstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ATX
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BLACKHAWK1998
What do you guys think Forced Induction 500RWHP VS All Motor 500RWHP. Witch one will win a 1/4 mi race?
Not sure on the winner, but I can tell you which motor I'd much rather have.

I've had a 550+ rwph boosted car and a 550 rwph spray car but never a 500 rwph N/A car (maybe soon, fingers crossed for TFS/HC Combo).

It all depends on what your'e doing to make the power. In my Supra, with a 3.0 I6. It sure was nice to put down 28mpg on the highway and still have 572 rwph when the boost gauge hit 1.8bar.

However, restricted to an F-car or C5/6. I think I'd rather have the n/a power for the sheer joy of not needing to constantly tune the thing.
Old 11-07-2006, 10:30 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
mike#9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Apopka, Fl
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

As always...it would depend on the setup.

I like the way N/A motors run, and I like the way and where they make their power.

At those HP levels, I would have to say that the N/A car would win if all things were equal. If all the cars involved were setup up to get the power and traction to the ground....then I think that the N/A car will make its power sooner. Turbo will have to build...but I think that a blown car could give it a run.

Then again I could be wrong!
Old 11-07-2006, 10:33 PM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (34)
 
headed-ws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DFW
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I chose N/A. You cant go wrong with a 408 with a huge H/C pakcage.
Old 11-07-2006, 10:38 PM
  #6  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (18)
 
1stz06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

408, heads, cam, 530-550 witout breaking a sweat. If you are still getting out run by those Supra's, give them a little 150 sqeeze!!! Emergencies only of course!!!
Old 11-07-2006, 10:50 PM
  #7  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
 
Blue02Ws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

It would totally be dependant on the setups, 550rwhp is 550rwhp with the optimal setup on both cars they will be equal.
Old 11-07-2006, 10:51 PM
  #8  
TECH Resident
 
jamesSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Racine, WI
Posts: 872
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

id go N/A all the way. 500 is easy with forced induction. actualy it seems kind of low these days. im sure with both having a forged motor, you could swap pullies or turn up the boost, but you can also add alittle 200 shot and get the same neck snapp feeling. i like the way N/A sounds. vicious!!!

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/8...c851bf28ca.htm


http://videos.streetfire.net/search/...39007816ca.htm

http://videos.streetfire.net/categor...2A151801C6.htm

Last edited by jamesSS; 11-07-2006 at 10:58 PM.
Old 11-07-2006, 11:14 PM
  #9  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Beast96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

It all depends on when each car comes on. It would be my belief that a stroker motor with 550 rwhp will start making power sooner than a stock bottom end with a blower/FI, therefore giving it the win. I choose cubes.
Old 11-08-2006, 05:12 AM
  #10  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
BlackHawk T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 2,869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The NA car with all else being equal will be 100-200lbs lighter.
Old 11-08-2006, 06:49 AM
  #11  
Launching!
iTrader: (15)
 
whiteLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: tampa,fl
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i pick N/A b/c i would assume you would build a motor. and then if you got bored with 500 you could always spray it.
Old 11-08-2006, 07:00 AM
  #12  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
jason02Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: cape cod mass
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i have a turbo set up and my car makes power right away and can foot break it to about 10 lb.thats 460tq so i dont have to build any power or wait for it NA heads and cam usualy make it at 4300 and peack hp at 6600. so who ever can get it to the ground faster and the better drag set up would prob. win its only a 1/4 mile
Old 11-08-2006, 10:13 AM
  #13  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Kraest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Covington, LA
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The forced induction car would make more torque and have a better powerband than the NA 500 rwhp car, especially if you're making comparing it to a smaller-cube NA 500 rwhp.

Also, the driveability and gas mileage are going to be much higher with a forced induction setup. No big cam to chug along.

I've had both, so I'm speaking from experience.
Old 11-08-2006, 10:27 AM
  #14  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
SPLATT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

cubes baby. dont get me wrong, i love boost. especially in the form of a turbo LSX car. but i would go with NA. there is just something bout a big nasty NA motor that gets to me. Plus I love N20, so i'm agreeing with everyone who said spray it if you get tired of 500.
Old 11-08-2006, 02:13 PM
  #15  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
 
MonkeyBoneSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=Kraest]The forced induction car would make more torque and have a better powerband than the NA 500 rwhp car, especially if you're making comparing it to a smaller-cube NA 500 rwhp.

Also, the driveability and gas mileage are going to be much higher with a forced induction setup. No big cam to chug along.[/QUOTE

I'll have to agree with Kraest, having a huge cam will wear on you in the long run. Not to mention your gas mileage will suffer If it's a DD, I'd go with the F.I. setup more user friendly to me.
Old 11-08-2006, 03:17 PM
  #16  
11Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Gauge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Dallas (Richardson), TX, USA
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

This all depends on what kind of FI we're talking about. If you had a good turbo setup, it should win. The torque curve would be unbeatable, and it would certainly counteract the extra weight and then some.

FI is the way to go IMO. You want more power? Turn up the boost. Bottles are for babies. Real men get blown.
Old 11-08-2006, 04:12 PM
  #17  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (14)
 
bayer-z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: N. Falmouth MA
Posts: 4,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I've been dying for a D1SC for a while now...

You COULD build a 500hp motor... but then think of the posibilities when you'd strap a blower/turbo to it...

Last edited by bayer-z28; 11-08-2006 at 07:02 PM.
Old 11-08-2006, 05:07 PM
  #18  
Staging Lane
 
06cobaltSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hicksville NY
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Beast96Z
It all depends on when each car comes on. It would be my belief that a stroker motor with 550 rwhp will start making power sooner than a stock bottom end with a blower/FI, therefore giving it the win. I choose cubes.
Depends on the type of FI. a twin screw type supercharger will have big block torque right off idle.
Old 11-08-2006, 05:13 PM
  #19  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
 
Blue02Ws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

It all depends on the setup...period.

If you have a NA 500rwhp motor where your stall brings you off the line hard and jumps to it's powerband it will be performing perfectly to it's designed specs.

If you have a FI car with 500rwhp and it can spool up and leave the line hard and then jump to it's powerband then it is also performing perfectly to it's designed specs.

Granted, this is in a perfect world and with a lot of knowledge for each setup, if you are just a normal guy with limited resources then yes there would be definite advantages from either setup. This bickering between which one would be best is crazy, 500rwhp is 500rwhp. Just look at the 1000rwhp supras out there running 11's because the guys don't care how it runs the 1/4 and don't set them up to do it.
Old 11-08-2006, 07:15 PM
  #20  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
cws T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

500 rwhp isnt all that common from a Na engine . I bet their are less than 100 cars on this site make that na out of the thousands here. Maybe 10 are 346 cube . Dont get me wrong as Im not saying it cant be done easy. Most parts choosen by members here will never reach that level . Take terminators car for example . thats a proven close enough to 500 rwhp car and the parts are at a reasonable costbut ,I still see members choosing a weaker head and cam packages.

F.I. is a different ballgame. A bolton car still running stock heads ,cam etc can reach 500 easy . Cant beat going from 350rwhp boltons to 500rwhp in a weekends work . plus mpg stays the same under normal driving .A headed, cammed ls1 or any engine at +14.7 atmosphere will double in power with a turbo . superchargers make +70-80percent ontop of what you have now at that psi .

Pretty good video, first runs in the 12's NA after addition of FI goes 9's .
http://video.ls1tech.com/category/Su...6a017a6681.htm


http://video.ls1tech.com/category/Su...4b01808b90.htm


Quick Reply: Forced Induction 500RWHP VS N/A 500RWHP



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:38 AM.