Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Cubic Inches vs. Forced Induction

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-25-2006, 04:30 PM
  #21  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
11 Bravo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 3,078
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by KHShapiro
some are refered to as daily drivers or grocery getters, i guess if you had to use them as such you would , but it aint pleasant.
Exactly why wouldn't it be pleasant? You need to go for a ride in a street car with 400+ cubes. Mine is 100% daily drivable. Having said that, the original poster did not say he wanted a daily driver. He wants 500hp.
Old 11-25-2006, 04:35 PM
  #22  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (10)
 
KHShapiro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 906
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i forgot to add , i wasnt questioning your qualifications, i am just trying to clear it up for some of the others that may read this and get confused.
Still have the GTO?

11 Bravo how much tq differance do you think the N/A will have vs the FI?
Old 11-25-2006, 04:41 PM
  #23  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
11 Bravo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 3,078
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by KHShapiro
11 Bravo how much tq differance do you think the N/A will have vs the FI?
Not much if any at 500hp levels. Most boosted LS1's I see here that make @ 500rwhp are in the mid to upper 400's in torque. About the same as a 402.
Old 11-25-2006, 04:53 PM
  #24  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (10)
 
KHShapiro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 906
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

11 Bravo : usually these is an Avg of 20+ rwtq differance between na/FI and as the FI gets higher there differance becomes greater compared to that of the N/A including a S/C
a 500 rwhp turbo car is gonna be close the same tq as hp and in alot fo cases they produce more tq than HP
here are 20 pages of N/A dyno numbers , granted there are a few odd ball numbers in there AND some of the numbers listed at boosted as in FI numbers
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...8&page=1&pp=20
Let me make something clear when I tallk about FI i am talking about Turbos (if anyone hasnt already figured that out) unless stated otherwise

the boosted list
https://netfiles.uiuc.edu/nbrinkw2/B...boosted_06.htm
Old 11-25-2006, 04:53 PM
  #25  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
landstuhltaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CBUS
Posts: 1,279
Received 45 Likes on 26 Posts

Default

+1 for n/a 402 set up for boost in the future
Old 11-25-2006, 04:57 PM
  #26  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (10)
 
KHShapiro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 906
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 11 Bravo
Exactly why wouldn't it be pleasant? You need to go for a ride in a street car with 400+ cubes. Mine is 100% daily drivable. Having said that, the original poster did not say he wanted a daily driver. He wants 500hp.
i was talking about these 10 and 9 second n/a rides
while yours not doubt is 100% user friendly are you in the 9's n/a?
Old 11-25-2006, 04:59 PM
  #27  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (15)
 
QSPres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: East Freetown, MA
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KHShapiro
i forgot to add , i wasnt questioning your qualifications, i am just trying to clear it up for some of the others that may read this and get confused.
Still have the GTO?

No, I sold it to a guy in England. I'm thinking about doing another one now though....
Old 11-25-2006, 09:33 PM
  #28  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
BlackHawk T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 2,869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think you guys are going to be susprised at what the NA game will bring in the next year or two.

BIG cubes make a car very driveable. Forget about poor street manners. I'm thinking:

LS2 402 or larger
CNC L92 Heads
Ported L76 Intake
Custom Cam
SCR 13:1-14:1
DCR 9:0 or more
E85

600-700rwhp anyone? And it can be very driveable. I bet you could hit 600rwhp with a "small" 238/242 LSK lobed cam, and have gobs of usable power all over. A 427-455 cube motor could probably crack 700-750rwhp with an individual runner intake. All speculation of course but we will see how far off it is pretty soon.

Basically what I am trying to say is NA can be a very formidable setup if done right, and it will be cheaper than forced induction. Although if you want to max out both setups, of course the boost will take you further.
Old 11-28-2006, 09:33 PM
  #29  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (18)
 
jermzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bay area, ca.
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by KHShapiro
i was talking about these 10 and 9 second n/a rides
while yours not doubt is 100% user friendly are you in the 9's n/a?

550 rw can get you into the 10's completely streetable NA with minor weight reduction. Not uncommon at ALL with a lsx stroker N/A.
Old 11-29-2006, 09:09 AM
  #30  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (10)
 
KHShapiro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 906
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

jermzz ,not to try and get into a sword fight here but you seem to have a decent set-up from your Sig, what are you running, any dyno numbers that show the curve?
Old 11-29-2006, 09:36 AM
  #31  
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
 
1slow98Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Theres no replacement for displacement!! build a 402 and make it nasty
Old 11-29-2006, 11:13 AM
  #32  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (51)
 
30th t/a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Butler, PA
Posts: 3,098
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jermzz
When I was heads cam LS1 I was keeping up with the blown cars making about 100 hp more then me. My friend haso had a vortech blown TA making 505 rw and said my car felt about just as strong when I was making 430rwhp on a stock motor.

Top end on a stroker is nasty. I would put money on a 500 rw stroker destroying a 500 rwhp blown stock motor any day of the week.
your right on here with this. i couldnt agree more.

i never drove a big cammed 402 but ive had a 346 with heads & a g5x3 which is a big cam for a 346 and it drove totally fine, totally streetable. I dont understand where everyone thinks NA is so unstreetable. maybe if your talk 14.1 comprresion with gigantic solid roller, then yea ok.
I also had a twin turbo with a stock cam & heads and it drove like a stock LS1.

if your looking for smooth 600 plus HP go FI but if 520-550rwhp is all you want Id go 402. watch the videos of a NA 500rwhp C6 z06 pull a FI 600rwhp KB cobra. Ive seen this twice so far and they were different cars & drivers.

Last edited by 30th t/a; 11-29-2006 at 11:24 AM.
Old 11-29-2006, 07:29 PM
  #33  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (18)
 
jermzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bay area, ca.
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by KHShapiro
jermzz ,not to try and get into a sword fight here but you seem to have a decent set-up from your Sig, what are you running, any dyno numbers that show the curve?
I'm still breaking in this motor on a base tune. Before the rebuild, it was a 422, and with mutiple spun bearings and imporper lifter preload it did around 530 / 490. Thats through a 12 bolt with 4.11's. Added a little more port work and a few cubes. Not sure what it will do now, but it feels strong...really strong.

I dont have the graph from before on hand, but it was making 420 ft/lb at about ~2300 rpm. IT's getting a full tune in a couple weeks and i'll post the graph for you.
Old 11-29-2006, 07:32 PM
  #34  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (18)
 
jermzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bay area, ca.
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 30th t/a
your right on here with this. i couldnt agree more.

i never drove a big cammed 402 but ive had a 346 with heads & a g5x3 which is a big cam for a 346 and it drove totally fine, totally streetable. I dont understand where everyone thinks NA is so unstreetable. maybe if your talk 14.1 comprresion with gigantic solid roller, then yea ok.
I also had a twin turbo with a stock cam & heads and it drove like a stock LS1.

if your looking for smooth 600 plus HP go FI but if 520-550rwhp is all you want Id go 402. watch the videos of a NA 500rwhp C6 z06 pull a FI 600rwhp KB cobra. Ive seen this twice so far and they were different cars & drivers.
Yeah, that's right. I saw a 630hp 03 cobra get beat by a 01ss with a 422ci ls6 making 520rwhp. 50 to 150 race I think it was. it's on video around here somewhere. Srokers are no joke and very streetable if set up and tuned correctly. You can run pump gas up to about 11.6:1 or so, as long as you stay in that range, youll make good power, have streetability and get decent gas mileage!
Old 11-29-2006, 08:47 PM
  #35  
On The Tree
 
speedyss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: edgewater, fl
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 11 Bravo
Having every eye on your car everywhere you go because it sounds like a Nextel Cup ride is a bonus
Tell me about it, its F*cking awsome!!! Mods in sig.
Old 11-30-2006, 06:00 AM
  #36  
FormerVendor
 
Quick Carl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by BlackHawk T/A
I think you guys are going to be susprised at what the NA game will bring in the next year or two.

BIG cubes make a car very driveable. Forget about poor street manners. I'm thinking:

LS2 402 or larger
CNC L92 Heads
Ported L76 Intake
Custom Cam
SCR 13:1-14:1
DCR 9:0 or more
E85

600-700rwhp anyone? And it can be very driveable. I bet you could hit 600rwhp with a "small" 238/242 LSK lobed cam, and have gobs of usable power all over. A 427-455 cube motor could probably crack 700-750rwhp with an individual runner intake. All speculation of course but we will see how far off it is pretty soon.

Basically what I am trying to say is NA can be a very formidable setup if done right, and it will be cheaper than forced induction. Although if you want to max out both setups, of course the boost will take you further.
Already been done. It's not a problem for big cube NA power over 700 HP, 650 Tq., pump gas, mild idle, TONS and TONS of torque without having to spool up a blower or turbo. Add 93 octane and go.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...7&page=1&pp=20
https://ls1tech.com/forums/archive/i.../t-534661.html
Old 11-30-2006, 06:33 AM
  #37  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
zo6vetteman2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Middleboro Ma.
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

There was an article in CHP recently where a forged mild streetable cam 402ci made 580hp and cost just under $10K U.S. to build. A procharged, forged LS1 will make serious power depending on how much boost, for about the same money doing it yourself and rebuilding your LS1 motor. You'll need to find a new set of heads though, but not totally necessary. To keep the cost down, I would look for an LQ9 head because of the 72cc combustion chambers. These can be found on the 6.0L Cadillac Escalade and they are aluminum and can be ported easily.

Last edited by zo6vetteman2003; 11-30-2006 at 06:39 AM.
Old 11-30-2006, 09:28 AM
  #38  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (18)
 
jermzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bay area, ca.
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Quick Carl
Already been done. It's not a problem for big cube NA power over 700 HP, 650 Tq., pump gas, mild idle, TONS and TONS of torque without having to spool up a blower or turbo. Add 93 octane and go.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...7&page=1&pp=20
https://ls1tech.com/forums/archive/i.../t-534661.html
That 703 was on a motor dyno also, don't forget. I'd do the math but I don't know what the drivetrain on the car theyre putting it in will be. Considering a 15% drivetrain loss, it would be somewhere around 600rw. only about 50 horse over what a decent smaller stroker would do at the wheels, and thats probably due to those ls7 heads. I bet the torque is off the charts though, i'd like to see a dyno sheet of the motor in a car on a chasis dyno.



Quick Reply: Cubic Inches vs. Forced Induction



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:13 PM.