Speed Inc. Heads/Cam Dyno Results!
03-05-2002, 05:16 PM
#41
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: IL
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Speed Inc. Heads/Cam Dyno Results! [quote]Originally posted by JimTA:
<strong>It is so flat and smooth mainly because of the dimensions of the graph. The X axis only ranges from 5000-7500 right? And the Y axis is really condensed. If the units on the Y axis were spaced farther apart it would look considerably different.
Just looking at the graph in general shows that it is of a horizontal shape. If it was stretched more vertical than horizontal, the curve would be very steep.
Not to say that Joe's curve isn't broad and flat, but the dimensions of the graph and the spacing of the units on the Y axis further exaggerate the flat shape. You could make it look however you wanted by changing the dimensions.
Anyway, Joe's car is flying and (shameless plug) Speed Inc is awesome.
[ March 05, 2002: Message edited by: JimTA ]</strong><hr></blockquote>
Dr. PNut (JimTA) explains it well.
<strong>It is so flat and smooth mainly because of the dimensions of the graph. The X axis only ranges from 5000-7500 right? And the Y axis is really condensed. If the units on the Y axis were spaced farther apart it would look considerably different.
Just looking at the graph in general shows that it is of a horizontal shape. If it was stretched more vertical than horizontal, the curve would be very steep.
Not to say that Joe's curve isn't broad and flat, but the dimensions of the graph and the spacing of the units on the Y axis further exaggerate the flat shape. You could make it look however you wanted by changing the dimensions.
Anyway, Joe's car is flying and (shameless plug) Speed Inc is awesome.
[ March 05, 2002: Message edited by: JimTA ]</strong><hr></blockquote>
Dr. PNut (JimTA) explains it well.
03-05-2002, 08:12 PM
#42
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: IL
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Speed Inc. Heads/Cam Dyno Results! Oh yeah, and Billy, you'll never run 12's in a TPI <img src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" border="0"> At least, the great BOSINGTON says so.
Don't worry, if it's nice, you'll get a ride this weekend. It pulls much harder then it used to!
Don't worry, if it's nice, you'll get a ride this weekend. It pulls much harder then it used to!
03-06-2002, 12:31 AM
#43
Re: Speed Inc. Heads/Cam Dyno Results! Something really puzzles me on this dyno graph
If the converter was unlocked how come it only made 390RWTQ?My car made over 520RWTQ w/an unlocked TP4400?
Why did u guys start the dyno # at that high of an RPM?
JS
[ March 05, 2002: Message edited by: JS ]</p>
If the converter was unlocked how come it only made 390RWTQ?My car made over 520RWTQ w/an unlocked TP4400?
Why did u guys start the dyno # at that high of an RPM?
JS
[ March 05, 2002: Message edited by: JS ]</p>
03-06-2002, 12:38 AM
#44
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: IL
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Speed Inc. Heads/Cam Dyno Results! you kinda answered your own question, JS, didn't you?
The if they would've flash stalled it at 4000rpms, they would've recorded higher torque, right?
The if they would've flash stalled it at 4000rpms, they would've recorded higher torque, right?
